Ted ain't playin'

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16555
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Ted ain't playin'

Post by Scooter »

Image
"If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu."

-- Author unknown

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 18360
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Post by BoSoxGal »

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8569
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Post by Sue U »

That's good, but it's no Cleveland Browns:

Image
GAH!

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5441
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

There's a Snopes about that (Cleveland Browns) letter exchange which takes us back to a time when two people could disagree - even somewhat crudely - and laugh about it.

PS And good for Ted Lieu.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 20748
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

And there's the classic:
29th April 1971

Dear Sir,

We act for Mr Arkell who is Retail Credit Manager of Granada TV Rental Ltd. His attention has been drawn to an article appearing in the issue of Private Eye dated 9th April 1971 on page 4. The statements made about Mr Arkell are entirely untrue and clearly highly defamatory. We are therefore instructed to require from you immediately your proposals for dealing with the matter.

Mr Arkell's first concern is that there should be a full retraction at the earliest possible date in Private Eye and he will also want his costs paid. His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply.

Yours,
(Signed)
Goodman Derrick & Co.
------------------------------
Dear Sirs,

We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr. J. Arkell.

We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off.

Yours,
Private Eye
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5441
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

MGM - that was from a time when I could ill afford it, but I did manage to find the 10p or so a week for my own copy of Private Eye.

More of the story can be found here. Mr Arkell promptly withdrew his complaint against Private Eye.

Post Reply