Plan B Forum

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:08 pm**

Posted: **Tue Jan 21, 2020 9:37 pm**

That's good, but it's no Cleveland Browns:

Posted: **Wed Jan 22, 2020 1:35 am**

There's a Snopes about that (Cleveland Browns) letter exchange which takes us back to a time when two people could disagree - even somewhat crudely - and laugh about it.

PS And good for Ted Lieu.

Posted: **Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:07 am**

And there's the classic:

29th April 1971

Dear Sir,

We act for Mr Arkell who is Retail Credit Manager of Granada TV Rental Ltd. His attention has been drawn to an article appearing in the issue of Private Eye dated 9th April 1971 on page 4. The statements made about Mr Arkell are entirely untrue and clearly highly defamatory. We are therefore instructed to require from you immediately your proposals for dealing with the matter.

Mr Arkell's first concern is that there should be a full retraction at the earliest possible date in Private Eye and he will also want his costs paid. His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply.

Yours,
(Signed)
Goodman Derrick & Co.

------------------------------

Dear Sirs,

We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr. J. Arkell.

We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off.

Yours,
Private Eye

Posted: **Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:22 pm**

MGM - that was from a time when I could ill afford it, but I did manage to find the 10p or so a week for my own copy of Private Eye.

More of the story can be found here. Mr Arkell promptly withdrew his complaint against Private Eye.

Plan B Forum

Ted ain't playin'

Ted ain't playin'

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Re: Ted ain't playin'

Re: Ted ain't playin'