Page 1 of 7

Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:14 am
by Darren
You have to wonder when someone does that much digging for something that long ago.

Accidental finding or lucky strike?

Republican or Democrat dirty tricks?

Does someone have an inside source in the US attorney's office in Pittsburgh?

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:31 am
by Lord Jim
Yeah, this lone, uncorroborated 27 year old claim sounds like a great issue for President Grab 'Em By The Pussy...

A man with more than a dozen sexual misconduct accusers...

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:51 am
by Darren
Lord Jim wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:31 am
Yeah, this lone, uncorroborated 27 year old claim sounds like a great issue for President Grab 'Em By The Pussy...

A man with more than a dozen sexual misconduct accusers...
The point, Jim, is who dug it up? As far as more accusations.

OK Let's see it! WHAT DOES THE WOODWORK SAY?

Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:40 am
by RayThom
Doesn't our porn star president have 23 sexual abuse lawsuits waiting for him once he's out of office on January 20, 2021?

The end of an error.

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 1:51 pm
by Darren
RayThom wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:40 am
Doesn't our porn star president have 23 sexual abuse lawsuits waiting for him once he's out of office on January 20, 2021?

The end of an error.
I'm thinking if you're into alternative realities you'd be better off playing the lottery.

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:51 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
One accuser, Samantha Holvey, who [spoke] out again last year about her experience with Trump as a Miss USA pageant contestant, said that while his election was painful, she and [24] others see the #MeToo movement as an opportunity to "try round two."
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-a ... 17-12?IR=T

I bet his election was painful

Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 2:58 pm
by RayThom
Darren wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 1:51 pm
...I'm thinking if you're into alternative realities you'd be better off playing the lottery.
Darren, I'm thinking that if you think any unsubstantiated -- or even proven -- sexual harassment allegations against Papa Joe are going to somehow trump your Pussy Grabber-in-Chief's confirmed sexual abuse charges, then you have obviously been drinking way too many Lysol martinis being served up by that psychopath, lunatic that you blindly follow.

I'm praying I'll be here to vote on November 3rd to celebrate our Orange Mussolini being deposed.

God bless America.

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:35 pm
by Lord Jim
I'm thinking if you're into alternative realities
LMAO!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol:

A Trump supporter accusing other people of embracing "alternative realities"...

Image

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:35 pm
by Bicycle Bill
Ray — request and cast an absentee ballot as soon as they become available for the November election.

Even if you were to die — and I don't think that's likely; you're so damned crotchety and contrary that when Death comes to get you, you'll argue the issue with him until he finally gives up — your vote will still count.

And if you SHOULD pass on before November 3rd, don't worry.  I'll do enough celebrating of the "Rise and Fall of the Turd Reich" for the both of us.
Image
-"BB"-

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:43 pm
by Lord Jim
Darren, I know you and The Mad King's minions are determined to come up with anything you can think of to re-elect the most incompetent, ignorant, corrupt, criminal, and morally and mentally unfit President in American history, but this one really has the stench of desperation wafting from it...

You'll have to do much better than this to assure the re-election of this pathetic buffoon, especially as he presides over the deaths of thousands upon thousands of Americans and economic loss and hardship not seen since The Great Depression...

Go try grasping at some other straw...

Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:52 pm
by RayThom
Bicycle Bill wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:35 pm
Ray — request and cast an absentee ballot as soon as they become available for the November election...
That's my plan.

Last week I cast my ballot for those running in the PA primary -- rescheduled for June 2nd. My local Dem rep already has me on file so I can receive a ballot for November 3rd as soon as they're ready for mailing.

My chemotherapy will last for the next six months. I'm sticking around to make sure I get my money's worth -- from the hospital, and from my Constitutionally guaranteed franchise.

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:06 pm
by Darren
Lord Jim wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 3:43 pm
Darren, I know you and The Mad King's minions are determined to come up with anything you can think of to re-elect the most incompetent, ignorant, corrupt, criminal, and morally and mentally unfit President in American history, but this one really has the stench of desperation wafting from it...

You'll have to do much better than this to assure the re-election of this pathetic buffoon, especially as he presides over the deaths of thousands upon thousands of Americans and economic loss and hardship not seen since The Great Depression...

Go try grasping at some other straw...
Does that mean you think the Republicans dug that bit of trash out of the garbage? Yes or No?

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:31 pm
by Lord Jim
Don't know, don't care; total fart in a fishbowl which will have zero impact on the election. I have no interest in looking at the squirrel.

Trump is not only consistently losing to Biden in national polling, but he's upside-down in all the major battle ground states as well. This diversionary smear will do nothing to change that...

Again, you need a another straw to grasp at...

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:45 pm
by Darren
Lord Jim wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:31 pm
Don't know, don't care; total fart in a fishbowl which will have zero impact on the election. I have no interest in looking at the squirrel.

Trump is not only consistently losing to Biden in national polling, but he's upside-down in all the major battle ground states as well. This diversionary smear will do nothing to change that...

Again, you need a another straw to grasp at...
You still in believe polls after 2016? I guess we all need something to believe in.

It's after noon. I believe I'll have a beer.

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:10 pm
by Darren
Maybe, just maybe the DNC is feeling the burn instead of the Bern. Could a resourceful progressive be at the bottom of an attempted coup on Biden's candidacy?

What say the #metoo's?

All quiet on the Democrat front?

Will Bernie prevail at last?

Did he release his electors?

"Nick Brana - #DemExit #PeoplesParty
@nick_brana
"Dear @DNC
you have two options:

1. Pull Biden now and win with Bernie

2. Keep Biden, re-elect Trump, and admit that suppressing progressives is the true purpose of your party""

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:24 pm
by Bicycle Bill
Darren, I don't care about a single, unsubstantiated, long-past-its-shelf-life accusation/allegation against Biden.  You could even have actual video of Biden engaging in a gangbang in the middle of the street in broad daylight, as well as proof of him drowning kittens, kicking puppies, and stealing candy from babies, and I'd STILL vote for him for president as opposed to the unbalanced asshole we have now.
Image
-"BB"-

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:25 pm
by Scooter
DemExit would be that fake "movement" invented by Republicans that used stock photos they pretended were actual Democrats leaving the party, right?

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:36 pm
by BoSoxGal
If the Democrats destroy themselves over this very questionable allegation, then they deserve what they get in November. But the rest of us will get dragged along into the abyss with them.

As I understand it, the only corroboration to Ms. Reade’s allegations is that she told her mother, brother and a friend. Of course they’d believe her, because they have no other context.

We are expected to believe that ALL the staff in Biden’s office at that time are lying to cover up what was an allegedly hostile workplace for Reade, the senior office staff she claims she complained to are lying, and the Senate HR Department with whom she claims she filed a formal complaint but of which there is no record or recollection are also lying. Everyone else is lying. And despite the wide open opportunity to publicly reveal sexual misconduct allegations when Biden was being excoriated for his habit of touching shoulders and hair and kissing - habits I’m not defending, they’re old school paternalistic and sexist and he should have figured out to stop that a long time ago - not only didn’t Ms. Reade come forward with sexual assault allegations then, neither did any woman who ever worked with him or interacted with him in decades of public life.

I’ll eat my words if a whole bunch of credible allegations suddenly come up against Biden, but I don’t think they will. I think it’s more likely that Reade mistook Biden’s overwarmth for something it wasn’t, began to act inappropriately and was gently exited from his senate staff. She made the allegations to her family and friends by way of explaining how she lost a job she’d probably raved about only months before (she worked for him not even a year), but never pursued anything because she knew it wasn’t true. 27 years later she’s looking for what I don’t know - belonging?

What I find most ludicrous is her allegation that he assaulted her in a ‘tucked away corner’ somewhere in the halls of the Russell Senate Office building. That doesn’t square with my recollection of the level of foot traffic in congressional buildings in the 90s - unless she’s claiming, and she hasn’t, that this happened well outside of regular business hours when there are Congresscritters, staffers and visitors coming and going by the dozens at pretty much all times except the wee hours.

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:47 pm
by Lord Jim
You still in believe polls after 2016?
Asked and answered:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=19974&p=276926&hili ... ng#p276926

This is my last comment on this non-issue. Don't bother trying to get me to waste any more time or energy on it...

Image

This desperate smear thread deserves to drop off the first page like a stone, and I will no longer assist you in keeping it in a position which it in no way deserves...

Re: Slow Joe is a no go?

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 8:51 pm
by Darren
Lord Jim wrote:
Sun Apr 26, 2020 6:47 pm
You still in believe polls after 2016?
Asked and answered:

This desperate smear thread deserves to drop off the first page like a stone, and I will no longer assist you in keeping it in a position which it in no way deserves...
It's a dead issue already unless the AOC's, Tilabs, etc. start mouthing off. If they start talking about it, the media won't be able to ignore the little progressive darlings.

Based on past events, I'm sure Pelosi has things under control.