Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Inquiring minds want to know.
"If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu."
-- Author unknown
-- Author unknown
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
"Trumpademic" maybe?
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Over 5,400,000 cases; over 170,000 deaths.
And now he's talking openly about eliminating funding for Social Security and Medicare.
And now he's talking openly about eliminating funding for Social Security and Medicare.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
America is going to be the next Venezuela under Trump.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
I don't think the SS funding scheme stands a chance in Congress, and, while it plays well with his base, could blow up in his face when those on social security--people who do vote--see their funding dry up; many would vote for anyone to keep that from happening because they know damn well that ti will lead to a loss of the benefits they rely on. And they'll vote their wallets.
On top of that, if we eliminate the payroll tax, the break even point will require a tax increase of nearly 13% to cover the SS revenue and nearly another 3% for meidicare. Who is going to support what will be perceived as a 16% boost in the income tax (OK, it may be a bit lower if it applies to all income, including interest, capital gains, and pensions and social security benefits)? And you can pretty much bet this would be laid on the backs of the individual tapayers who, unless they are self employed, pay only half of that?
This is the mark of a desperate man trying to find an issue to energize his base; he has deferred the payroll tax temporarily, claiming recent legislation gives him the ability to do that in the same way that he deferred the tax deadline to July 15; and then trying to make it an issue. I doubt there's very much support move SS/medicare to the general fund, and even many republican legislators would hesitate publicly supporting that for fear of losing votes.
On top of that, if we eliminate the payroll tax, the break even point will require a tax increase of nearly 13% to cover the SS revenue and nearly another 3% for meidicare. Who is going to support what will be perceived as a 16% boost in the income tax (OK, it may be a bit lower if it applies to all income, including interest, capital gains, and pensions and social security benefits)? And you can pretty much bet this would be laid on the backs of the individual tapayers who, unless they are self employed, pay only half of that?
This is the mark of a desperate man trying to find an issue to energize his base; he has deferred the payroll tax temporarily, claiming recent legislation gives him the ability to do that in the same way that he deferred the tax deadline to July 15; and then trying to make it an issue. I doubt there's very much support move SS/medicare to the general fund, and even many republican legislators would hesitate publicly supporting that for fear of losing votes.
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9014
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
I can't believe Trump would even hint at cancelling or even defunding Social Security, let alone say so out loud. How many of those red-state voters that delivered most of the American midsection and south as well as swung a couple states like Wisconsin and Indiana to him in 2016 don't have a 401K or huge stock portfolios to fall back on, or are already on Social Security or very close in age to being able to sign up for it themselves? Don't they know that they'll be cutting their own throats, as well as those of their parents and grandparents?
It sounds like Trump has gone straight past unbalanced and mentally unstable all the way to "babbling, incontinent idiot who's sitting in a pool of his own piss and playing with his turds".
-"BB"-
It sounds like Trump has gone straight past unbalanced and mentally unstable all the way to "babbling, incontinent idiot who's sitting in a pool of his own piss and playing with his turds".
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
- datsunaholic
- Posts: 1790
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:53 am
- Location: The Wet Coast
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Unfortunately Trumpanzees either think that SS should be abolished and they'd be better off managing that money themselves, or that it will continue to be funded by some magic money tree that will sprout up once all them illegal immigrants are gone.
Death is Nature's way of telling you to slow down.
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Rapidly approaching 6 million total cases.
Already past 180,000 deaths.
Already past 180,000 deaths.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
There will be 500,000 - 600,000 dead by years end if current models bear out - with flu coming and people headed indoors, shitstorm is on the horizon.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Does 11,000,000 cases and a quarter million deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Does 14,000,000 cases and 275,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Today there were over 180,000 new cases and over 2,600 deaths.
Is that what "getting down to zero" looks like?
Is that what "getting down to zero" looks like?
"If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu."
-- Author unknown
-- Author unknown
So now that we're up to a 9/11 level of death every DAY
Still a "mediademic"?
"If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu."
-- Author unknown
-- Author unknown
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
How about 600,000? Still a "mediademic"?
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Exciting developments in our pandemic - soon to come a fourth wave suffered almost exclusively by antivaxxers! This should be interesting.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/08/us/misso ... index.html
Missouri and the other low vaccination rate southern states are also low very high on the average BMI chart. This Delta Dawn will be wearing the lilies of death.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/08/us/misso ... index.html
Missouri and the other low vaccination rate southern states are also low very high on the average BMI chart. This Delta Dawn will be wearing the lilies of death.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
Lest you be tempted to regard this story as "good" news, here's the really really bad part of that story:
Somewhere in there will appear the Epsilon, Zeta, Eta, and Theta variants. Given enough time to mutate, and enough bodies to host new mutations, eventually one of these will be exponentially more deadly, and/or more transmissible, and/or more vaccine-resistant. Then we're all screwed.
Viruses do not just float around in the air humming to themselves until some poor bastard walks through the wrong errant breeze. They live inside hosts. This one is still being passed from host to host, by the millions, and in those hosts it is still doing what viruses do: mutating, again and again, until it finds a version of itself that will be more successful at surviving attempts to fight it.In fact, a new data analysis has identified clusters of unvaccinated people, most of them in the southern United States, who are vulnerable to surges in Covid-19 cases and could become breeding grounds for even more deadly variants.
Somewhere in there will appear the Epsilon, Zeta, Eta, and Theta variants. Given enough time to mutate, and enough bodies to host new mutations, eventually one of these will be exponentially more deadly, and/or more transmissible, and/or more vaccine-resistant. Then we're all screwed.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 20699
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
But Econo - hasn't the south always been a breeding ground for even deadlier variants?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Does 4,000,000 cases and 150,000 deaths still qualify as a "mediademic"?
I believe there is already an Epsilon variant from California that largely fizzed out - not aggressively transmissible like Delta.Econoline wrote: ↑Fri Jul 09, 2021 7:14 amLest you be tempted to regard this story as "good" news, here's the really really bad part of that story:Viruses do not just float around in the air humming to themselves until some poor bastard walks through the wrong errant breeze. They live inside hosts. This one is still being passed from host to host, by the millions, and in those hosts it is still doing what viruses do: mutating, again and again, until it finds a version of itself that will be more successful at surviving attempts to fight it.In fact, a new data analysis has identified clusters of unvaccinated people, most of them in the southern United States, who are vulnerable to surges in Covid-19 cases and could become breeding grounds for even more deadly variants.
Somewhere in there will appear the Epsilon, Zeta, Eta, and Theta variants. Given enough time to mutate, and enough bodies to host new mutations, eventually one of these will be exponentially more deadly, and/or more transmissible, and/or more vaccine-resistant. Then we're all screwed.
But yes more infection means more opportunities for variants and already the mRNA vaccines with the strongest efficacy are beginning to see rising breakthrough infection and some waning efficacy - Pfizer is working on a booster as we speak.
The ages of people getting very sick, hospitalized and dying in India with the Delta variant is getting lower all the time. There is a very real possibility that this fall will see another surge and this one begins killing more children. 11 and unders don’t even qualify for vaccination still, don’t even have the opportunity to protect themselves.
Why won’t people just get vaccinated?!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan