Plan B Forum

Apologize bullshit, would you apologize for cutting off a cancerous leg, and would you apologize for ending a bad marriage with a divorce? Perhaps what this country needs is a divorce. If we keep going the way we have been going, we will end up killing each other; would not a divorce be better than that. Already the left feels they have the right to attack others, and the others have no right to self-defense. A boy is attacked by three vigilante leftist men and charged with murder for defending himself. Clearly, there is one law for the leftist and one law for the others. Think about this how would you feel if you are held hostage while your children are killed in front of your eyes. That is the existence you are creating would not a political divorce be better than that?

https://news.yahoo.com/mississippi-lawm ... 10549.html

A Mississippi politician has apologized after he called for his state to "succeed" in wake of Joe Biden's presidential victory.
"We need to succeed [sic] from the union and form our own country," State Rep. Price Wallace wrote in a since-deleted tweet.
The post was in response to a thread by Wallace's fellow state Rep. Robert Foster, who is among the GOP lawmakers who have questioned Biden's projected win over President Donald Trump.
"Not sure who all needs to hear this but we are not a Democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic. The majority does not rule, the law derived from a Constitution has the final say," Foster tweeted. "... After all legal votes are counted and confirmed by their state legislatures Republicans will accept the results even if it’s not in our favor. The same way we did with Obama twice."
- ADVERTISEMENT -
Wallace made his account private early Wednesday following widespread backlash over his secession comment. He made the account public several hours later and issued an apology over his secession statement.
Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn also denounced Wallace's controversial statement, and insisted the lawmaker was "remorseful" for what he said.
"We certainly do not condone nor agree with Price’s comment, but I have spoken to Price, and he is very apologetic and remorseful for what he said," Gunn told Mississippi Free Press. "He deeply regrets his comment and as I understand it has issued an apology and a retraction."

Maybe he was apologizing for being an ignorant shit? "succeed"!!!!

He also stated that Al Gore was president-elect for 30 days. Also bullshit

Can we revoke liberty’s ability to make stupid polls?

Crackpot wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 14, 2020 7:43 pm

Can we revoke liberty’s ability to make stupid polls?

Why is it stupid Crack Head? Would you get a divorce or continue to beat your wife?

I couldn't vote because "donate to the village idiot's lobotomy" wasn't one of the options.

A full-frontal lobotomy would indeed be an improvement.

dales wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 15, 2020 12:48 am

A full-frontal lobotomy would indeed be an improvement.

What is your plan to keep hating until it festers into cancer? We just have irreparable differences; we are already two different countries it is just not official. If the union was an individual marriage it would have ended in divorce long before now. Nothing would give Shit Head more pleasure than seeing Americans killing each other.

I don't know what you mean by "political divorce". The democratic party and the republican party are already legally separated. There has always been a bunch of MAGA types who hate minorities and "liberals". Trump just brought them more out into the open than they were before.

Same as it ever was....

Joe Guy wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 15, 2020 2:42 am

I don't know what you mean by "political divorce". The democratic party and the republican party are already legally separated. There has always been a bunch of MAGA types who hate minorities and "liberals". Trump just brought them more out into the open than they were before.

Same as it ever was....

A political divorce would be a legal agreement that divides the present country into two countries each with its borders and government. We would be better off without you all. We might be poorer, but we would be better able to manage what did have. And militarily, we would be more secure. We would have a draft to augment our professional military; making our military less expensive. And, if we were threatened with invasion we would use our tactical nukes if needed. We would not allow illegal immigrants to take jobs from our citizens. If we needed immigrant farm workers we would have a government program for that. In short, we would lookout for the best interest of our people.

FUCK YOU AND THIS FUCKING TRAITOROUS VILE SPEW!

I for one am not willing to give up any inch of this beautiful country - not even Mississippi which is lovely in its own way - nor will I abandon one single American devoted to the Union AND their home state with equal ardor.

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MOTHERFUCKER! Get with the program and learn to swallow the fruits of democracy - if WE could live through four years of 45*, YOU can learn to deal, and all your little red hatted friends, too!

BoSoxGal wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:32 am

FUCK YOU AND THIS FUCKING TRAITOROUS VILE SPEW!

I for one am not willing to give up any inch of this beautiful country - not even Mississippi which is lovely in its own way - nor will I abandon one single American devoted to the Union AND their home state with equal ardor.

THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MOTHERFUCKER! Get with the program and learn to swallow the fruits of democracy - if WE could live through four years of 45*, YOU can learn to deal, and all your little red hatted friends, too!

There is no such thing as treason in this country. Jane Fonda committed treason by providing aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war, so if that was not treason how can a political agreement be treason? I remember when liberal saw patriotism as the attitude of fools and hayseeds. BSG is an imperialist.

There are plenty of liberals in "red states" and there are plenty of conservatives in "blue states". There is no way to geographically separate the two tribes, so we might as well get used to each other.

liberty is a disunionist.

Econoline wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 15, 2020 5:12 am

There are plenty of liberals in "red states" and there are plenty of conservatives in "blue states". There is no way to geographically separate the two tribes, so we might as well get used to each other.

India and Pakistan did it, well for the most part.

liberty wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 15, 2020 5:28 am

Econoline wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 15, 2020 5:12 am

There are plenty of liberals in "red states" and there are plenty of conservatives in "blue states". There is no way to geographically separate the two tribes, so we might as well get used to each other.

India and Pakistan did it, well for the most part.

Yeah, with MASSIVE social disruption. And they're now two nuclear-armed adversaries. No thanks.

liberty wrote: ↑

Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:25 am

A political divorce would be a legal agreement that divides the present country into two countries each with its borders and government.   Two countries -- with separate borders, and, of course, rules and restrictions for people to travel from the "Disjointed States of Trumpland" into the civilized world.

We would be better off without you all.   and conversely, we would be better off without you, too.

We might be poorer, but we would be better able to manage what did have.   Of course — if you got nuthin', it's easy to manage it.

And militarily, we would be more secure.
We would have a draft to augment our professional military; making our military less expensive.   WHAT professional military?  Or are you going to claim that any redneck with a peashooter is all of a sudden a fully-trained combat equivalent of GI Joe?  Oooohhh, that'll be fun to watch!

And, if we were threatened with invasion we would use our tactical nukes if needed.   Ditto — WHAT tactical nukes?  Or do you think that the US military would just hand everything — weapons, equipment, infrastructure, etc. — in the 'divorcing' territories over to you just because you ask nicely?  Sorry, but other than privately owned shotguns, AR-15s, AK-47s, and other assorted bangsticks, every other piece of military equipment in these disaffected areas is still the property of the United States and would be removed to 'loyal' areas immediately.  Remember also the Biblical reference ... Hosea 8:7, if you want to look it up ... about what happens to those who sow the wind.

We would not allow illegal immigrants to take jobs from our citizens.
If we needed immigrant farm workers we would have a government program for that.   first you say your citizens will not lose their jobs to illegal immigrants; now you're already planning to bring in immigrants to do your grunt work for you. Tell me, how long before you start shipping blacks in from Africa again?  And, of course, where's the government you're going to need to administer all this?

In short, we would lookout for the best interest of our people.   until the first hurricane, flood, or other natural disaster.  Or were you going to appeal to Moscow, or Beijing, or Havana, or Pyongyang for bailout money?

This crack-pipe dream of yours has about as much of a chance as Pickett had at Gettysburg or Custer had at Little Big Horn.

-"BB"-

Hey lib!

CALIFRONIA has more nukes than any other state and could blast your piss-poor pesthole into smithereens.

You might wish to re-think your dumbass plan.

Hypocrites make good dictators and tyrants. Gore held up GW’s transition.

http://us.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stor ... index.html

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Saying they would find their own way around the nation's capital, officials tapped by Texas Gov. George W. Bush moved forward in Washington and Austin, Texas on Monday with plans to begin establishing a new presidential administration, even if they don't get any help from the federal government."

When was Al Gore president?