Trump's Vilest Legacy

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9743
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Trump's Vilest Legacy

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Americans’ Acceptance of Trump’s Behavior
Will Be His Vilest Legacy


Most of the 74,222,957 Americans who voted to re-elect Donald Trump — 46.8% of the votes cast in the 2020 presidential election — don’t hold Trump accountable for what he’s done to America.

Their acceptance of Trump’s behavior will be his vilest legacy.

Nearly forty years ago, political scientist James Q. Wilson and criminologist George Kelling observed that a broken window left unattended in a community signals that no one cares if windows are broken there.  The broken window is thereby an invitation to throw more stones and break more windows.  The message:  go ahead and do whatever you want here, because others have done it and gotten away with it.

The 'broken window theory' has led to picayune and arbitrary law enforcement in poor communities.  But America’s most privileged and powerful have been breaking big windows with impunity.
  • • In 2008, Wall Street nearly destroyed the economy.  The Street got bailed out while millions of Americans lost their jobs, savings, and homes.  Yet no major Wall Street executive ever went to jail.
    • In more recent years, top executives of Purdue Pharmaceuticals, along with the members of the Sackler family that own it, knew the dangers of OxyContin but did nothing.
    • Executives at Wells Fargo Bank pushed bank employees to defraud customers.
    • Executives at Boeing hid the results of tests showing its 737 Max Jetliner was unsafe.
    • Police chiefs across America looked the other way as police under their command repeatedly killed innocent black Americans.
Here, too, they’ve gotten away with it.  These windows remain broken.

Trump has brought impunity to the highest office in the land, wielding a wrecking ball to the most precious windowpane of all — American democracy.  The message?  A president can obstruct special counsels’ investigations of his wrongdoing, push foreign officials to dig up dirt on political rivals, fire inspectors general who find corruption, order the entire executive branch to refuse congressional subpoenas, flood the Internet with fake information about his opponents, refuse to release his tax returns, accuse the press of being “fake media” and “enemies of the people”, and make money off his presidency.

And he can get away with it.  Almost half of the electorate will even vote for his reelection.

A president can also lie about the results of an election without a shred of evidence — and yet, according to polls, be believed by the vast majority of those who voted for him.

Trump’s recent pardons have broken double-pane windows.  Not only has he shattered the norm for presidential pardons — usually granted because of a petitioner’s good conduct after conviction and service of sentence — but he’s pardoned people who themselves were shattering windows.  By pardoning them, he has rendered them unaccountable for their acts.  They include aides convicted of lying to the FBI and threatening potential witnesses in order to protect him; his son-in-law’s father, who pleaded guilty to tax evasion, witness tampering, illegal campaign contributions, and lying to the Federal Election Commission; Blackwater security guards convicted of murdering Iraqi civilians, including women and children; Border Patrol agents convicted of assaulting or shooting unarmed suspects; and Republican lawmakers and their aides found guilty of fraud, obstruction of justice and campaign finance violations.

It’s not simply the size of the broken window that undermines standards, according to Wilson and Kelling.  It’s the willingness of society to look the other way.  If no one is held accountable, norms collapse.

Trump may face a barrage of lawsuits when he leaves office, possibly even including criminal charges.  But it’s unlikely he’ll go to jail.  Presidential immunity or a self-pardon will protect him.  Prosecutorial discretion would almost certainly argue against indictment, in any event.  No former president has ever been convicted of a crime.  The mere possibility of a criminal trial for Trump would ignite a partisan brawl across the nation.

Congress may try to limit the power of future presidents — strengthening congressional oversight, fortifying the independence of inspectors general, demanding more financial disclosure, increasing penalties on presidential aides who break laws, restricting the pardon process, and so on.  But Congress — a co-equal branch of government under the Constitution — cannot rein in rogue presidents on their own.  And the courts don’t want to weigh in on political questions.

So the appalling reality is that Trump ⃥m⃥a⃥y⃥  will get away with it.  And in getting away with it he will have changed and degraded the norms governing American presidents.  The giant windows he’s broken are invitations to a future president to break even more.

Nothing will correct this unless — and until — an overwhelming majority of Americans recognize and condemn what has occurred.
(Robert Reich, writing in the Guardian)
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5753
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Trump's Vilest Legacy

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

I read the Graun pretty thoroughly but I missed that piece by Reich. Thanks for posting it, BB.

Big RR
Posts: 14744
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Trump's Vilest Legacy

Post by Big RR »

Interesting, but I have to disagree with the exercise of pardoning power, most presidents have made some horrendous pardons; in recent history, we can startiwith Ford's pardon of Nixon, assuring a president would nor be investigated and held accountable; but remember Clinton pardoned not only a relative (half brother Roger) and a major Dem donor (Mark Rich), W pardoned a major administration official (Libby), the list goes on and on. And it's no surprise that Trump has done this, he's done it through the administration (recall Arpaio?). Pardons have been routinely doled out to the unworthy, especially if they are rich and powerful and big donors to the party in powerI think we have to do as much as we can to reign in executive power, but we are as stuck with the power to pardon as we are with the electoral college.

Post Reply