Page 1 of 1

Court to Texas: Nice try, thanks for playing

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:05 pm
by Scooter
Federal court blocks Texas from using new congressional gerrymander in 2026 midterms

Texas cannot use its new congressional map for the 2026 election and will instead need to stick with the lines passed in 2021, a three-judge panel ruled Tuesday.

“The public perception of this case is that it’s about politics,” U.S. Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee, wrote in the ruling. “To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map.”

Brown ordered that the 2026 congressional election “shall proceed under the map that the Texas Legislature enacted in 2021.” The case will likely be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but time is short: Candidates only have until Dec. 8 to file for the upcoming election.

The decision is a major blow for Republicans, in Texas and nationally, who pushed through this unusual mid-decade redistricting at the behest of President Donald Trump. They were hoping the new map would yield control of 30 of the state’s 38 congressional districts — up from the 25 they currently hold — and help protect the narrow GOP majority in the U.S. House.

The map cleared the GOP-controlled Legislature in August and was quickly signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott. Several advocacy groups sued over the new district lines, saying lawmakers intentionally diluted the voting power of Black and Hispanic Texans and drew racially gerrymandered maps. Over the course of a nine-day hearing in El Paso earlier this month, they aimed to convince the judges that it was in voters’ best interest to shelve the new map until a full trial could be held.

It was not immediately clear if the state still has a legal path to restoring the new map in time for 2026. Unlike most federal lawsuits, which are heard by a single district judge and then appealed to a circuit court, voting rights lawsuits are initially heard by two district judges and one circuit judge, and their ruling can only be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The decision comes 10 days into the monthlong period when candidates can sign up for the March primary. The filing deadline is Dec. 8.

This is just the opening gambit in what promises to be a yearslong legal battle over Texas’ congressional map. A lawsuit over the state’s 2021 redistricting — including its state legislative and education board seats — went to trial earlier this summer and remains pending before the same three-judge panel. The judges have indicated they may want to see how the U.S. Supreme Court rules on a major voting rights case before issuing their full ruling on Texas’ maps.

But for Trump, and many of his Republican supporters in Texas, the short-term goal of having this map for the 2026 election was as important as the long game.

“I’m convinced that if Texas does not take this action, there is an extreme risk that [the] Republican majority will be lost,” Sen. Phil King, R-Weatherford, said on the floor of the state Senate before the new map passed. “If it does, the next two years after the midterm, there will be nothing but inquisitions and impeachments and humiliation for our country.”

Re: Court to Texas: Nice try, thanks for playing

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:12 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
“I’m convinced that if Texas does not take this action, there is an extreme risk that [the] Republican majority will be lost,” Sen. Phil King, R-Weatherford, said on the floor of the state Senate before the new map passed. “If it does, the next two years after the midterm, there will be nothing but inquisitions and impeachments and humiliation for our country.”
And I'm convinced that the next 2 years after the midterm will in any case be nothing but the continuation of the first 2 years of Trump-led inquisitions and impeachments and humiliation for our country

Re: Court to Texas: Nice try, thanks for playing

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:32 pm
by Big RR
I really don't care about the inquisitions (no impeachments I am aware of), but I do think any continuation of the yes men/women sycophants of the Pumpkinhead will, at the very least, lead to more humiliation and likely will do so serious damage to the US.

Re: Court to Texas: Nice try, thanks for playing

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:44 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
Big RR wrote:
Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:32 pm
I really don't care about the inquisitions (no impeachments I am aware of)
Comey? The hunt for mortgage cheats (only Dems need to be examined)? Those are inquisitions. Kimmel, MTG (gulp, aargh)) etc. are impeachments of character, although not in the Congressional Impeachment kind of way. You do care. I know you do.

noun: impeachment; plural noun: impeachments

1.(especially in the US) a charge of misconduct made against the holder of a public office.
historical: a charge of treason or another crime against the state

2. the action of calling into question the integrity or validity of something

Re: Court to Texas: Nice try, thanks for playing

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2025 2:35 pm
by Big RR
Not really; the point of an investigation is to see whether the charges (including impeachments of character as you list) are proper and sustainable. Sure they are politically motivated--many investigations have been so motivated throughout history' but I'd much rather have a public investigation than just unsupported mudslinging or, as is seen in many countries, disappearances or jailing for "national security". You have problems with the process or complain the rights of the party are not being protected, then, yes, I do care and I will support you. But, otherwise, why i sometimes tire of the statements made by the other side, I don't have a problems with it. But perhaps you have a better alternative to public investigations?

As for impeachment, point taken. But I was thinking if the word in the political sense, bringing of formal charges against a public official as prescribed by law, not impeachment of character.