Dropped cases cost us dear..

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Dropped cases cost us dear..

Post by Gob »

Taxpayers foot bill as up to one in 12 court cases are dropped

JOEL GIBSON LEGAL AFFAIRS
May 10, 2010

CHARGES are dropped in as many as one in 12 cases in the state's largest criminal court, with one in 20 not dropped until the week of the trial, costing taxpayers thousands of dollars a year.

Previously unpublished District Court figures show that, in most of the cases, prosecutors drop charges after months of expensive preparation by both sides.

In some cases, victims have endured months of stress anticipating matters going to court while wrongfully accused have spent time behind bars.

More than once a week, the taxpayer picks up the tab across all courts because a judge decides a defendant should not have to pay the legal costs they incurred.

There were also 67 costs orders granted against the Crown across all courts last year and 57 the previous year, adding up to more than $1.1 million.

But they were a small part of the 32,000 matters prosecuted, a spokeswoman for the Director of Public Prosecutions said.

The reasons for charges being dropped at the last minute include underfunding of prosecution and Legal Aid services and overcharging by police, say criminal justice experts.

Stephen Odgers, SC, the chairman of the NSW Bar Association's Criminal Law Committee, said it had been a problem for some time because senior prosecutors and defence lawyers became involved too late in the process. ''I'm not criticising the DPP. They do it for very understandable financial reasons,'' he said.

The president of the Criminal Defence Lawyers Association, Phillip Boulten SC, said the solution was more money for the DPP and the Legal Aid Commission. ''But the early identification of problematic prosecutions would save a large amount of taxpayer dollars, including the costs of incarcerating people needlessly,'' he said.

George Ikners, a barrister of 20 years experience, said in some cases ''an aggressive attitude adopted by police and the prosecution is not reflected in the facts available''.

''Often you could be excused for feeling some charges are laid or continued with on the basis of let's see what happens or turns out.''

The chief executive of the Victims of Crime Assistance League, Robyn Cotterell-Jones, said abandoned prosecutions upset victims of crime who were strung along.

She called for committal hearings to be done away with in favour of a magistrate vetting investigations early on, and a more inquisitorial system without so many barriers to evidence.

DPP figures reveal that some charges were dropped in 529 matters last year across all courts, with all charges dropped in about 30 per cent. In one in three cases where all charges were dropped, it was due to the victim's wishes.

The DPP spokeswoman said each case was different and was assessed on its merits.

''Sometimes witnesses or accused die. They change their story or are found to have given false evidence or are otherwise discovered to be unreliable … Sometimes police are simply not able to provide the evidence needed to support the charges.

NSW Police did not respond to a request for comment.


http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/taxpayers-foo ... -ulqo.html
Ok, would any of our legal eagles care to give their views on this?

Is it inevitable that so many cases would be dropped, or is it bad management?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8905
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Dropped cases cost us dear..

Post by Sue U »

A voluntary dismissal rate of 8 percent is not so bad, when you consider that means that 92 percent of prosecutions go forward. It is inevitable that a certain percentage of cases will never pan out due to evidentiary issues. The problem is determining at the earliest stage possible exactly which cases to drop. Your article identifies the two most significant problems: overly aggressive charging by police and a lack of legal staffing available for early case evaluations:
The reasons for charges being dropped at the last minute include underfunding of prosecution and Legal Aid services and overcharging by police, say criminal justice experts.

Stephen Odgers, SC, the chairman of the NSW Bar Association's Criminal Law Committee, said it had been a problem for some time because senior prosecutors and defence lawyers became involved too late in the process. ''I'm not criticising the DPP. They do it for very understandable financial reasons,'' he said.

The president of the Criminal Defence Lawyers Association, Phillip Boulten SC, said the solution was more money for the DPP and the Legal Aid Commission. ''But the early identification of problematic prosecutions would save a large amount of taxpayer dollars, including the costs of incarcerating people needlessly,'' he said.
But "spending more money on criminals" doesn't get any politician elected.
GAH!

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19386
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Dropped cases cost us dear..

Post by BoSoxGal »

In one of the counties where I presently practice, the prosecutors cut & paste directly from police reports in filing an Information with the Court (an Information is the charging document here in Montana). They often haven't really looked at the evidence in the case until weeks before trial - yet are very resistant to any attempts to persuade in terms of reducing or dropping charges. The prosecutorial mindset is often very inflexible, and beyond dropping cases, they find themselves having a hard time convincing juries - especially in felony trials.

It costs the taxpayers all around - cost of prosecutorial preparation, cost of public defense preparation, cost of losing a productive member of society when unwillingness to reduce bond, etc. results in the defendant's loss of job, home, etc.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Dropped cases cost us dear..

Post by Gob »

Ok, so, relatively, it's not as bad as the SMH (newspaper) is making it out to be?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19386
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Dropped cases cost us dear..

Post by BoSoxGal »

I think it's bad, but I have a defense attorney perspective.

The problem in the US is that there is now so much money in the 'War on This', 'War on That' that prosecutors and police have their eyes on the bottom line of number of tickets, cases filed, etc. - in order to qualify for state and federal grants for fighting this and that. Reason has somewhat gone out the window.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply