Page 1 of 8
Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the military
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:09 pm
by Scooter
He's not for throwing the first stone, he's for throwing them out instead:
Republican presidential hopeful and Texas governor Rick Perry found himself trying to explain his opposition to gays serving openly in the military to a 14-year-old girl in Iowa who demanded to know “why you’re so opposed to gays serving openly in the military, why you want to deny them that freedom when they’re fighting and dying for your right to run for president.”
ABC News reports on the exchange between Perry and Rebecka Green on Sunday in Decorah. Green later identified herself to reporters as bisexual.
“Here’s my issue,” said Perry, unaware of the teen’s sexual orientation. “This is about my faith, and I happen to think, you know, there are a whole hosts of sins. Homosexuality being one of them, and I’m a sinner and so I’m not going to be the first one to throw a stone,” he said. “I don’t agree that openly gays should be serving in the military. ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ was working and my position is just like I told a guy yesterday, he said, ‘How would you feel if one of your children was gay?’ I said I’d feel the same way. I hate the sin, but I love the sinner, but having them openly serve in the military, I happen to think as a commander in chief of some 20,000 plus people in the military is not good public policy, and this president was forced by his base to change that policy and I don’t think it was good policy, and I don’t think people in the military thought it was good policy.”
"20,000 plus people in the military"? I guess knowing how to count isn't a qualification for being president either.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:42 pm
by Lord Jim
Hey, 1.3 million
is "20,000
plus"....
I'm really thrilled about his idea to have Congress convene only every other year....
He must think this is a real "winner" since he keeps repeating it....
It may have a certain visceral appeal, (given the unpopularity of Congress) but if anyone stops and thinks about it for just two seconds, it's difficult to imagine an idea that would concentrate even
more power in to the hands of The Executive (no matter
who the President is...) than this cockamamie scheme...

Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:13 pm
by dgs49
Yeah, Jim, the best way to analyze something is to give it two seconds of thought.
Anyone who is familiar with "committee" dynamics knows at least 2 things about committees: (1) the collective IQ drops further for every additional participant, and (2) the more time they have to work on a problem, the worse the ultimate solution will be. The United States Congress is living, breathing proof of these two axioms.
Name any successful organization in the world that has a full-time Rules Committee two hundred years after its founding. It is absurd on its face.
Perry is such an idiot. He couldn't even figure out how to answer this question from a 14-year old girl in front of a phalanx of cameras. That's a good test, isn't it?
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:27 pm
by Scooter
Yes, heaven forbid a presidential candidate should have come to a position based on reasons and be able to explain them. Oh, wait, he's from Texas...
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:27 pm
by rubato
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Yeah, you want to be sure they're moral enough to go kill people.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 1:52 pm
by dgs49
Let's see...
Does a pre-pubescent girl have any idea what it means to be a "homosexual," or what specific kinds of conduct are the concern of the Military?
Is she aware that, until they were commanded to get with the program, our military commanders were virtually unanimous in condemning both "don't ask/don't tell," and the abolition of it in favor of welcoming open gays into the military? Is she aware that for the first 200+ years of the Republic, homosexual activity brought about immediate discharge from military service?
Is she aware of the Biblical underpinnings of the moral code that shuns homosexuality, or that it is also shunned by every major religion on the planet?
Is she aware of the ramifications of the acceptance of homosexuality in the military with respect to housing, "spousal" benefits, "marriage" in jurisdictions that accept gay "marriage," the problems with chaplains who continue to preach the values that are intrinsic to their respective religions (including, by the way, Islam)?
Yeah, he should have been able to answer her question with a quick and cogent sentence or two. Anyone could.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:40 pm
by Scooter
And yet you just managed it, however wrongheaded your opinion might be. In contrast all he could come up with was "well, uh, it's a sin...and uh, I'm a sinner too, and uh, sinning is bad so, uh...isn't it nice weather we're having?"
And the notion that opposition to having gays serve in the military is not conducive to a soundbite response is flatly contradicted by the many who have managed it before. What they were saying was bullshit, but at least it was coherent-sounding bullshit.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:06 pm
by loCAtek
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
That's what they said about women.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:51 am
by dgs49
Scoots, please find me an example of a politician who has answered anything like this question, asked by a child. I would really like to see it.
Or better yet, have a stab at it yourself. You have 25 words.
Loca, women have been in the military for eons. It's COMBAT where they have not been welcome. And for good reason.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:02 am
by Scooter
Gays in the military will interfere with unit cohesion.
Gays in the military will hamper military effectiveness.
Gays in the military will be a security risk.
Gays in the military will make other soldiers uncomfortable in the shower.*
All those things and more have been advanced by those politicians who have chosen to pander to their neanderthal constituency by spitting in the faces of living gay soldiers and on the graves of the dead ones. None of it requires a Ph.D to understand, and if a 14 year old is incapable of understanding the nonsense arguments that have been advanced by chicken hawks like yourself against those who are risking their lives to save your sorry ass, it's not because he/she is too young, but because the arguments are bullshit.
*oh, sorry, it's 38 words. Take out all occurrences of "gays in the military will" except the first one, insert some commas, and an "and" before the last clause, and it will be 24 words.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 4:02 am
by loCAtek
dgs49 now you're gonna get
me started.
Women have been in combat for eons; sometimes disguised as men or openly as the Japanese female samurai were.
The Romans believed Minerva was a Goddess of War, which is why she is depicted on the United States Medal of Honor;
...not to mention the patron Warrior Goddess of California;

Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:01 pm
by BoSoxGal
Rick Perry is the latest totally inarticulate village idiot foisted upon the national political stage by Texas, which apparently holds a grudge of some kind against the rest of this great nation. Attempting to defend his bumbling is foolhardy; he's simply not ready for prime time.
Sadly, neither was Dubya - but that didn't keep him from being appointed to the Presidency by the SCOTUS, so we know that any horrible thing is possible in American politics.
I bet more Americans would like to have a beer with good 'ol Rick than any other candidate.

Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:41 pm
by Lord Jim
Actually, I'd most like to have a beer with Mitt Romney...
Since he doesn't drink at all, he'd have no tolerance built up....
The results could be quite amusing....

Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:12 pm
by dgs49
(1) LJ, you should be able to switch to Orange Crush (preferred by Mormons) for one day.
(2) Loca: Women in combat in the Civil War - 0. WWI - 0. WWII - 0. Korea - 0. Vietnam - 0. Women could be useful in a guerilla war in a very limited-tightly defined capacity, or flying a bomber, or as a sniper, but humping a rifle and carrying a backpack in the boonies - political correctness run amok. Any time one of them is taken as a POW, there is a national panic to DO ANYTHING TO GET HER BACK! There is not one woman in a thousand who could have passed the P.T. test we were required to pass at the end of Basic Training in the Army (including carrying a 150lb person 150 yards in less than 30 seconds). Women in combat is just like women firefighters. Bullshit. How many women firefighters died on 9/11/01? Zero. How would you like to be lying incapacitated in a burning bedroom and see a 140lb firefighter coming to rescue you?
(3) Scoots, none of your points is appropriate or relevant as an answer to a 14-year-old girl.
(4) Isn't it interesting how people who have never served in the military are so unanimously convinced that it's not an issue? While people who were and are in the military (other than those who are ordered to think otherwise) are less sure.
Just sayin'.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:29 pm
by loCAtek
Women in the Civil War, as stated previously,
often disguised themselves in order to fight.This is confirmed in many historical medical records of wounded soldiers being treated for injuries and having their true sex revealed;
Perhaps the most poignant story about women in the Civil War is one told in the book Women in War , 1866, by Frank Moore. In 1863, at age 19, a woman known only as Emily, ran away from home and joined the drum corps of a Michigan Regiment. The regiment was sent to Tennessee and during the struggle for Chatanooga a minie ball pierced the side of the young soldier. Her wound was fatal and her sex was disclosed. At first she refused to disclose her real name but as she lay dying she consented to dictate a telegram to her father in Brooklyn. Forgive your dying daughter. I have but a few moments to live. My native soil drinks my blood. I expected to deliver my country but the fates would not have it so. I am content to die. Pray forgive me...... Emily.


Disguised as a man (left), Frances Clayton served many months in Missouri artillery and cavalry units. (By courtesy of the Trustees of the Boston Public Library)
FWIW The first and only female recipient of the Medal of Honor served during the Civil War;
Dr Mary Walker, a surgeon in the Civil War, was awarded the nation's highest honor by President Andrew Johnson. The citation reads, in part, Whereas it appears from official reports that Dr. Mary E. Walker, a graduate of medicine, has rendered valuable service to the government, and her efforts have been earnest and untiring in a variety of ways, and that she was assigned to duty and served as an assistant surgeon in charge of female prisoners at Louisville, KY., under the recommendation of Major-Generals Sherman and Thomas, and faithfully served as contract surgeon in the service of the United states, and has devoted herself with much patriotic zeal to the sick and wounded soldiers, both in the field and hospitals, to the detriment of her own health, and has endured hardships as a prisoner of war four months in a southern prison while acting as contract surgeon....
An exact figure can't be known since many of their real identities are still hidden, but estimates are at around 400.
ETA: LJ's documentary says the estimated figure is over 600 women fought in the Civil War.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:40 pm
by loCAtek
Women in World War I; similar situation, it's hard to get an exact number but they were there.
Englishwoman, Flora Sandes, published a book on her experiences as a soldier in the Serbian Army in 1916, with a view to raising funds for her brothers in arms. Sandes was initially an ambulance driver on the Eastern Front but managed to enlist with the Serbs, who by 1916 had already promoted her to sergeant-major. She stayed on after the war with the Serbian army eventually becoming a major.
Supposedly, Sandes was accepted by the Serbs as the personification of British war aid, a symbolic value also attached though in another sense to no doubt the most famous female combatant of the Great War: the Russian Maria Bochkareva. A soldier in the Army since 1914, wounded and decorated several times, Bochkareva convinced the revolutionary leader Alexander Kerensky in 1917 that a battalion made exclusively of women would shame men grown diffident about the war into fighting.
She recruited 2,000 women out of which about 250 saw actual combat on the Austrian Front fighting together with units of male soldiers.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:43 pm
by Lord Jim
I saw an excellent documentary about the women in the Civil War who disguised themselves as me in order to fight, LoCa...
A fascinating and little known story....
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:45 pm
by loCAtek
By World War II, Russia openly recruited women soldiers;
800,000 women served in the Soviet Armed Forces during the war.[1] Nearly 200,000 were decorated and 89 eventually received the Soviet Union’s highest award, the Hero of the Soviet Union. They served as pilots[2], snipers, machine gunners, tank crew members and partisans, as well as in auxiliary roles.[3]
...
The 586th Fighter Aviation Regiment: This unit was the first to take part in combat (April 16, 1942) of the three female regiments and participated in 4,419 combat missions (125 air battles and 38 kills). Lydia Litvyak and Katya Budanova were assigned to the unit before joining the 437th IAP in the fighting over Stalingrad and became the world's only two female fighter aces (with 12 and 11 victories respectively), both flying the Yak-1 fighter.
...
Land forces
The Soviet Union deployed women snipers extensively, and to great effect, including Nina Alexeyevna Lobkovskaya and Ukrainian Lyudmila Pavlichenko (who killed over 300 German soldiers). The Soviets found that sniper duties fit women well, since good snipers are patient, deliberate, have a high level of aerobic conditioning, and normally avoid hand-to-hand combat.
Women served as machine gunners, tank drivers, medics, communication personnel and political officers. Manshuk Mametova was a machine gunner from Kazakhstan and was the first Soviet Asian woman to receive the Hero of the Soviet Union for acts of bravery.
Women crewed the majority of the anti-aircraft batteries employed in Stalingrad. Some batteries, including the 1077th Anti-Aircraft Regiment, also engaged in ground combat.
Soviet women in World War II
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:53 pm
by loCAtek
More women have fought and died in Iraq than in all the wars since World War II put together. Over 206,000 have served in the Middle East since March 2003, most of them in Iraq; and over 600 have been wounded and 104 have died in Iraq alone, according to the Department of Defense. In Iraq, one in ten troops is a woman.
ETA: RE: WTC - Three women rescue workers were killed that day" -- Port Authority Capt. Kathy Mazza, police officer Moira Smith and paramedic Yamel Merino.
Re: Rick Perry's latest: sinners shouldn't be in the milita
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:22 pm
by Scooter
dgs49 wrote:Scoots, none of your points is appropriate or relevant as an answer to a 14-year-old girl.
But you think "people who sin shouldn't be in uniform" was an appropriate way to answer the question?
If he believed it to be that difficult to explain, he could have been as condescending as you and told her, "It's complicated, and you're too young to understand." Even that would have been better than the drivel that ran from his mouth.
Or are you, in your own way, admitting that there is no good answer to the question?
Isn't it interesting how people who have never served in the military are so unanimously convinced that it's not an issue? While people who were and are in the military (other than those who are ordered to think otherwise) are less sure
Just sayin'.
Isn't it interesting how people who have never served in the military are so sure about what people in the military think, yet are always wrong?
From
Zogby, 2006, asked of current and former military personnel:
Whether gays and lesbians should be allowed to serve in the miltary, 58% agree or don't care, 37% oppose, 5% are not sure.
Impact of gay/lesbian presence on morale, 72%% no impact or positive impact, 28% negative impact, 1% not sure.
Comfort in the presence of gays and lesbians, 73% comfortable, 19% uncomfortable, 8% unsure.
Your opinion is in a clear minority even among military personnel.
Just sayin'.