"Closed Shop" in the Public Sector

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
dgs49
Posts: 3458
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:13 pm

"Closed Shop" in the Public Sector

Post by dgs49 »

One of Governor Walker’s (R - Wis). initiatives that caused the recent kerfuffle was to make the state an “open-shop” employer, and stop collecting union dues from employee paychecks. Since that initiative was implemented, about half of the state employee union members have resigned from their unions and stopped paying dues. This begs the question of why they would do that.

(a) There are many cheap bastards among them. They want the benefits of union representation, but don’t want to pay for it. Or maybe they think the union dues are too high; the cost/benefit relationship is not satisfactory.

(b) Some government employees (and other humans) simply don’t want to be members of a union. They are comfortable with the structure of government employment – pay scales and benefits are fixed, and most promotions and perqs are distributed on the basis of seniority. But they really have no desire to be union members.

(c) They object to some of the activities and expenses (presumably political ones) that are paid for out of their union dues, and want to express their displeasure by withdrawing. I know several people who are unionized government employees (my daughter-in-law is a public school teacher), and they are, if not “conservative Republicans,” then at least moderate and some of them are very critical of the strident and extreme political positions taken by their unions, and resentful of the political donations that they are involuntarily funding.

If this initiative spreads to other states the effect on public-sector unions will be devastating. They have large staffs, huge budgets, and a way of doing things that is quite costly. It will change the political landscape considerably, as donations and in-kind work for Democrat candidates and causes will be significantly impacted.

Nice, huh?

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: "Closed Shop" in the Public Sector

Post by Econoline »

(d) Many have realized that without the right to collective bargaining, unions will be unable to do much for their members.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

dgs49
Posts: 3458
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:13 pm

Re: "Closed Shop" in the Public Sector

Post by dgs49 »

Well...collective bargaining has not been eliminated, merely cut back a bit.

And the Federal unions have done quite well for the GS employees WITHOUT collective bargaining.

And of course, let us not forget, as we throw around the concept of "rights," public employees' collective bargaining rights are entirely statutory, and CAN be removed by legislation to that effect.

Unlike the right to vote, criticize the government, bugger your boyfriend, and other CONSTITUTIONAL rights.

Post Reply