Page 1 of 2

The view from abroad

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:06 pm
by Gob
In small matters, so it is in large.

It's interesting that, as the Herald reports today, an overwhelming 72 per cent of Australians would vote for the Democrats' Barack Obama if they had a vote in the US presidential election while a mere 5 per cent would choose the Republicans' Mitt Romney.

That is probably evidence of two facts. One is that, as the incumbent for four years, Australians know a good deal more about Obama than Romney.

Second is the fact that Australia is a much more left-leaning country than the US. In aggregate, Australians naturally incline to a Democrat world view more than a Republican one. And not only Australians, but the entire developed world, as it happens.

In Canada, for instance, the balance is similarly lopsided with voters preferring Obama by a margin of seven to one, according to a poll by Canadian Press-Harris Decima. And a Pew poll across 21 countries in June showed that ''Obama would cruise to re-election in November if Europeans and Japanese could vote,'' as Agence-France Press put it.

''The centre of gravity of American opinion is much further to the right'' than it is in any other rich country, as John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge wrote in their book The Right Nation.

The US is the only country in the developed world that does not provide paid maternity leave, for instance, and the only one that does not pay child support to all families.

''America upholds the right to bear arms, the death penalty and strict sentencing laws,'' write Micklethwait and Wooldridge, Englishmen both. ''The US is one of the few rich countries where abortion is a galvanising political issue, and perhaps the only one where half the families regularly say grace before meals.'' yes retard, we know the rest of the world doesn't count.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:39 pm
by dgs49
I JUST HAD A BRAINSTORM!

HAVE THE BASTARD RUN FOR SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS!!!!!

And good riddance!

During the last election cycle I spent quite a bit of time in Europe, and some considerable time discussing the election with my counterparts. They were just THRILLED that a so-called, "Black Man" was running for President, and couldn't imagine why anyone would vote for "that other guy." They were ignorant of his positions on any actual government policies (as were most Americans at the time), but thought it would be compellingly cool to have a "Black" president.

Ironically, they probably would have felt the same if they HAD known his policies. In fact, Our Beloved President would like nothing better than to transform the U.S. into a limp-wristed, impotent shell of a "superpower" where everyone has cradle to grave security as we careen into national bankruptcy. Just like most of Europe.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:40 pm
by Grim Reaper
dgs49 wrote: They were ignorant of his positions on any actual government policies (as were most Americans at the time), but thought it would be compellingly cool to have a "Black" president.
I'm going to go out on a tiny limb and bet that "ignorant" really means "didn't agree with my views".
dgs49 wrote:Ironically, they probably would have felt the same if they HAD known his policies. In fact, Our Beloved President would like nothing better than to transform the U.S. into a limp-wristed, impotent shell of a "superpower" where everyone has cradle to grave security as we careen into national bankruptcy. Just like most of Europe.
Right. Because abandoning people who fall behind for any reason, making sure preventative medicine is difficult to get, and making abortions illegal, will somehow catapult us into a second golden age.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:57 pm
by Big RR
while Australia may be left leaning, Obama is not--OK maybe to DGS, but otherwise he has abandoned the left (and his principles) in pursuit of the middle. Between the two candidates Obama is more left leaning, but he i hardly what I'd call a liberal.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:29 pm
by Gob
Big RR wrote:while Australia may be left leaning, Obama is not--

It's all relative. In the US he would be seen as left of centre / middle ground. In Aus / the UK he would be moderate right.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:39 pm
by Lord Jim
What the Obama experience should teach anyone who was not aware of the fact before, is just how profoundly unimportant...completely meaningless in fact...whether or not a US President is well liked by the "average" people in other countries is in terms of how the governments of those countries respond to the US.

There is not one single, significant tangible example that I can think of that would show Barack Obama, (one of the internationally best liked US Presidents of recent memory) having been in even the slightest way more effective (or in fairness, less effective) at persuading either our friends or our foes to follow policies favored by the United States, than George W Bush, (one of the internationally least liked US Presidents of recent memory).

This is not to say that his Administration has been completely ineffective in this regard; it just hasn't been any more effective than Bush's (which was wasn't completely ineffective either.)

In short, a President's popularity amongst non Americans ain't worth a bucket of warm spit in any meaningful policy sense....

So accordingly, I give the question of whether or not a President is personally popular internationally, all the due value and consideration it deserves when deciding who I should support for the office...

Which is to say precisely none....

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:54 pm
by Gob
I have to agree Jim, with one caveat.

How the rest of the world's population, the non-politicians, responds to and perceives America IS influenced by the president.

Liking, fearing, empathising, looking up to, looking down at, laughing with, laughing at, understanding, the USA are massively affected by your president.

9/11 saw a massive outpouring off empathy and goodwill to the USA, which was quickly and effectively shat on by GWB.

The GWB effect had a massive negative effect on how America was perceived, Obama has righted that some..

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:07 pm
by Long Run
Obama has righted that
Which would explain why American Olympic successes were so well supported by the international crowd. :?

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:45 pm
by Gob
You missed a word in your quote.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:46 pm
by Long Run
Gob wrote:You missed a.
some

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:12 pm
by rubato
Long Run wrote:
Obama has righted that
Which would explain why American Olympic successes were so well supported by the international crowd. :?
While we see so many Boston Red Sox fans celebrating the New York Yankees successes, by contrast.

yrs,
rubato

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:17 pm
by dales
This thread title is rather mysogonistic, is it not?

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 2:53 pm
by dgs49
What the ROW fails to recognize is that the United States Constitution, and the economic history of the United States, are fundamentally different from that of most Western "democracies." Take Canada, for example. Canada FORMALLY CHOSE to make healthcare available to all Canadians, and for the nation and its provinces to fund that massive undertaking. The United States has never made that choice, and in fact, it would be un-fucking-Constitutional.

Canadians (and Europeans), therefore, think that Republican efforts to sabotage "Obamacare" are nothing but mean-spirited selfishness on the part of the "haves" in the U.S. The same basic disconnect comes into play in the areas of retirement, paid "family" leave, unemployment compensation, and so on.

People from other "western" countries simply don't understand why the U.S. - and particularly the political Right - "refuse" to acknowledge what they consider to be basic civil "rights" and government obligations.

The U.S. has chosen, and is prohibited from, treating these government benefits as "rights" or obligations of the taxpayers. And the political Left, one might observe, has never actually tried to modify the U.S. Constitution to facilitate the creation of these "rights," because the political Left knows that the state legislatures (which would have to approve it) would NEVER go along. So they try to implement their program by stealth: executive orders, judicial activism, and so on.

Our social and economic program is fundamentally different than it is in Europe. They don't like it, but we don't care.

So there.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:23 pm
by liberty
What ever happen to the patriot act? It is interesting that we don’t hear anything about it now that BO is president.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:00 pm
by Scooter
Perhaps because a number of its more odious provisions were amended via reauthorizations, and because its most notorious abuses have been curtailed under the current administration.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:13 pm
by liberty
dgs49 wrote: Take Canada, for example. Canada FORMALLY CHOSE to make healthcare available to all Canadians, and for the nation and its provinces to fund that massive undertaking. The United States has never made that choice, and in fact, it would be un-fucking-Constitutional.

So there.
I like you dsg, but I must disagree; where in the constitution does it say that the right of people to not have government provided health coverage shall not be abridged? It doesn’t, the tenth amendment in our country, unlike Canada where the national (the only government) rules everything from the mud to the sky, divides power into three spheres between the national government, the state government and the people, each having the right to conduct their own affairs. There is nothing that says the federal or state government can’t tax monies and use to it provide for universal health coverage.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 5:29 pm
by Scooter
liberty wrote:unlike Canada where the national (the only government) rules everything from the mud to the sky
You are clearly an ignoramus. From the Constitution Act, 1867:
VI. DISTRIBUTION OF LEGISLATIVE POWERS

91. It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate and House of Commons, to make Laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada, in relation to all Matters not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces; and for greater Certainty, but not so as to restrict the Generality of the foregoing Terms of this Section, it is hereby declared that (notwithstanding anything in this Act) the exclusive Legislative Authority of the Parliament of Canada extends to all Matters coming within the Classes of Subjects next hereinafter enumerated; that is to say,
1. Repealed.
1A. The Public Debt and Property.
2. The Regulation of Trade and Commerce.
2A. Unemployment insurance.
3. The raising of Money by any Mode or System of Taxation.
4. The borrowing of Money on the Public Credit.
5. Postal Service.
6. The Census and Statistics.
7. Militia, Military and Naval Service, and Defence.
8. The fixing of and providing for the Salaries and Allowances of Civil and other Officers of the Government of Canada.
9. Beacons, Buoys, Lighthouses, and Sable Island.
10. Navigation and Shipping.
11. Quarantine and the Establishment and Maintenance of Marine Hospitals.
12. Sea Coast and Inland Fisheries.
13. Ferries between a Province and any British or Foreign Country or between Two Provinces.
14. Currency and Coinage.
15. Banking, Incorporation of Banks, and the Issue of Paper Money.
16. Savings Banks.
17. Weights and Measures.
18. Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes.
19. Interest.
20. Legal Tender.
21. Bankruptcy and Insolvency.
22. Patents of Invention and Discovery.
23. Copyrights.
24. Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians.
25. Naturalization and Aliens.
26. Marriage and Divorce.
27. The Criminal Law, except the Constitution of Courts of Criminal Jurisdiction, but including the Procedure in Criminal Matters.
28. The Establishment, Maintenance, and Management of Penitentiaries.
29. Such Classes of Subjects as are expressly excepted in the Enumeration of the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces.
And any Matter coming within any of the Classes of Subjects enumerated in this Section shall not be deemed to come within the Class of Matters of a local or private Nature comprised in the Enumeration of the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces.

92. In each Province the Legislature may exclusively make Laws in relation to Matters coming within the Classes of Subjects next hereinafter enumerated; that is to say,
1. Repealed.
2. Direct Taxation within the Province in order to the raising of a Revenue for Provincial Purposes.
3. The borrowing of Money on the sole Credit of the Province.
4. The Establishment and Tenure of Provincial Offices and the Appointment and Payment of Provincial Officers.
5. The Management and Sale of the Public Lands belonging to the Province and of the Timber and Wood thereon.
6. The Establishment, Maintenance, and Management of Public and Reformatory Prisons in and for the Province.
7. The Establishment, Maintenance, and Management of Hospitals, Asylums, Charities, and Eleemosynary Institutions in and for the Province, other than Marine Hospitals.
8. Municipal Institutions in the Province.
9. Shop, Saloon, Tavern, Auctioneer, and other Licences in order to the raising of a Revenue for Provincial, Local, or Municipal Purposes.
10. Local Works and Undertakings other than such as are of the following Classes:
(a) Lines of Steam or other Ships, Railways, Canals, Telegraphs, and other Works and Undertakings connecting the Province with any other or others of the Provinces, or extending beyond the Limits of the Province:
(b) Lines of Steam Ships between the Province and any British or Foreign Country:
(c) Such Works as, although wholly situate within the Province, are before or after their Execution declared by the Parliament of Canada to be for the general Advantage of Canada or for the Advantage of Two or more of the Provinces.
11. The Incorporation of Companies with Provincial Objects.
12. The Solemnization of Marriage in the Province.
13. Property and Civil Rights in the Province.
14. The Administration of Justice in the Province, including the Constitution, Maintenance, and Organization of Provincial Courts, both oCivil and of Criminal Jurisdiction, and including Procedure in Civil Matters in those Courts.
15. The Imposition of Punishment by Fine, Penalty, or Imprisonment for enforcing any Law of the Province made in relation to any Matter coming within any of the Classes of Subjects enumerated in this Section.
16. Generally all Matters of a merely local or private Nature in the Province.

92A. (1) In each province, the legislature may exclusively make laws in relation to
(a) exploration for non-renewable natural resources in the province;
(b) development, conservation and management of non-renewable natural resources and forestry resources in the province, including laws in relation to the rate of primary production therefrom; and
(c) development, conservation and management of sites and facilities in the province for the generation and production of electrical energy.
(2) In each province, the legislature may make laws in relation to the export from the province to another part of Canada of the primary production from non-renewable natural resources and forestry resources in the province and the production from facilities in the province for the generation of electrical energy, but such laws may not authorize or provide for discrimination in prices or in supplies exported to another part of Canada.
(3) Nothing in subsection (2) derogates from the authority of Parliament to enact laws in relation to the matters referred to in that subsection and, where such a law of Parliament and a law of a province conflict, the law of Parliament prevails to the extent of the conflict.
(4) In each province, the legislature may make laws in relation to the raising of money by any mode or system of taxation in respect of
(a) non-renewable natural resources and forestry resources in the province and the primary production therefrom, and
(b) sites and facilities in the province for the generation of electrical energy and the production therefrom,
whether or not such production is exported in whole or in part from the province, but such laws may not authorize or provide for taxation that differentiates between production exported to another part of Canada and production not exported from the province.
(5) The expression “primary production” has the meaning assigned by the Sixth Schedule.
(6) Nothing in subsections (1) to (5) derogates from any powers or rights that a legislature or government of a province had immediately before the coming into force of this section.

93. In and for each Province the Legislature may exclusively make Laws in relation to Education, subject and according to the following Provisions:
(1) Nothing in any such Law shall prejudicially affect any Right or Privilege with respect to Denominational Schools which any Class of Persons have by Law in the Province at the Union;
(2) All the Powers, Privileges, and Duties at the Union by Law conferred and imposed in Upper Canada on the Separate Schools and School Trustees of the Queen’s Roman Catholic Subjects shall be and the same are hereby extended to the Dissentient Schools of the Queen’s Protestant and Roman Catholic Subjects in Quebec;
(3) Where in any Province a System of Separate or Dissentient Schools exists by Law at the Union or is thereafter established by the Legislature of the Province, an Appeal shall lie to the Governor General in Council from any Act or Decision of any Provincial Authority affecting any Right or Privilege of the Protestant or Roman Catholic Minority of the Queen’s Subjects in relation to Education;
(4) In case any such Provincial Law as from Time to Time seems to the Governor General in Council requisite for the due Execution of the Provisions of this Section is not made, or in case any Decision of the Governor General in Council on any Appeal under this Section is not duly executed by the proper Provincial Authority in that Behalf, then and in every such Case, and as far only as the Circumstances of each Case require, the Parliament of Canada may make remedial Laws for the due Execution of the Provisions of this Section and of any Decision of the Governor General in Council under this Section.

93A. Paragraphs (1) to (4) of section 93 do not apply to Quebec.
Demonstrate that you have more brain cells than God gave a turnip by educating yourself. Or wallow in the ignorance of your bayou backwater, your choice.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:46 am
by liberty
Scooter wrote:
liberty wrote:unlike Canada where the national (the only government) rules everything from the mud to the sky
You are clearly an ignoramus. From the Constitution Act, 1867:
VI. DISTRIBUTION OF LEGISLATIVE POWERS

91. It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate and House of Commons, to make Laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada, in relation to all Matters not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces; and for greater Certainty, but not so as to restrict the Generality of the foregoing Terms of this Section, it is hereby declared that (notwithstanding anything in this Act) the exclusive Legislative Authority of the Parliament of Canada extends to all Matters coming within the Classes of Subjects next hereinafter enumerated; that is to say,
1. Repealed.
1A. The Public Debt and Property.
2. The Regulation of Trade and Commerce.
2A. Unemployment insurance.
3. The raising of Money by any Mode or System of Taxation.
4. The borrowing of Money on the Public Credit.
5. Postal Service.
6. The Census and Statistics.
7. Militia, Military and Naval Service, and Defence.
8. The fixing of and providing for the Salaries and Allowances of Civil and other Officers of the Government of Canada.
9. Beacons, Buoys, Lighthouses, and Sable Island.
10. Navigation and Shipping.
11. Quarantine and the Establishment and Maintenance of Marine Hospitals.
12. Sea Coast and Inland Fisheries.
13. Ferries between a Province and any British or Foreign Country or between Two Provinces.
14. Currency and Coinage.
15. Banking, Incorporation of Banks, and the Issue of Paper Money.
16. Savings Banks.
17. Weights and Measures.
18. Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes.
19. Interest.
20. Legal Tender.
21. Bankruptcy and Insolvency.
22. Patents of Invention and Discovery.
23. Copyrights.
24. Indians, and Lands reserved for the Indians.
25. Naturalization and Aliens.
26. Marriage and Divorce.
27. The Criminal Law, except the Constitution of Courts of Criminal Jurisdiction, but including the Procedure in Criminal Matters.
28. The Establishment, Maintenance, and Management of Penitentiaries.
29. Such Classes of Subjects as are expressly excepted in the Enumeration of the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces.
And any Matter coming within any of the Classes of Subjects enumerated in this Section shall not be deemed to come within the Class of Matters of a local or private Nature comprised in the Enumeration of the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces.

92. In each Province the Legislature may exclusively make Laws in relation to Matters coming within the Classes of Subjects next hereinafter enumerated; that is to say,
1. Repealed.
2. Direct Taxation within the Province in order to the raising of a Revenue for Provincial Purposes.
3. The borrowing of Money on the sole Credit of the Province.
4. The Establishment and Tenure of Provincial Offices and the Appointment and Payment of Provincial Officers.
5. The Management and Sale of the Public Lands belonging to the Province and of the Timber and Wood thereon.
6. The Establishment, Maintenance, and Management of Public and Reformatory Prisons in and for the Province.
7. The Establishment, Maintenance, and Management of Hospitals, Asylums, Charities, and Eleemosynary Institutions in and for the Province, other than Marine Hospitals.
8. Municipal Institutions in the Province.
9. Shop, Saloon, Tavern, Auctioneer, and other Licences in order to the raising of a Revenue for Provincial, Local, or Municipal Purposes.
10. Local Works and Undertakings other than such as are of the following Classes:
(a) Lines of Steam or other Ships, Railways, Canals, Telegraphs, and other Works and Undertakings connecting the Province with any other or others of the Provinces, or extending beyond the Limits of the Province:
(b) Lines of Steam Ships between the Province and any British or Foreign Country:
(c) Such Works as, although wholly situate within the Province, are before or after their Execution declared by the Parliament of Canada to be for the general Advantage of Canada or for the Advantage of Two or more of the Provinces.
11. The Incorporation of Companies with Provincial Objects.
12. The Solemnization of Marriage in the Province.
13. Property and Civil Rights in the Province.
14. The Administration of Justice in the Province, including the Constitution, Maintenance, and Organization of Provincial Courts, both oCivil and of Criminal Jurisdiction, and including Procedure in Civil Matters in those Courts.
15. The Imposition of Punishment by Fine, Penalty, or Imprisonment for enforcing any Law of the Province made in relation to any Matter coming within any of the Classes of Subjects enumerated in this Section.
16. Generally all Matters of a merely local or private Nature in the Province.

92A. (1) In each province, the legislature may exclusively make laws in relation to
(a) exploration for non-renewable natural resources in the province;
(b) development, conservation and management of non-renewable natural resources and forestry resources in the province, including laws in relation to the rate of primary production therefrom; and
(c) development, conservation and management of sites and facilities in the province for the generation and production of electrical energy.
(2) In each province, the legislature may make laws in relation to the export from the province to another part of Canada of the primary production from non-renewable natural resources and forestry resources in the province and the production from facilities in the province for the generation of electrical energy, but such laws may not authorize or provide for discrimination in prices or in supplies exported to another part of Canada.
(3) Nothing in subsection (2) derogates from the authority of Parliament to enact laws in relation to the matters referred to in that subsection and, where such a law of Parliament and a law of a province conflict, the law of Parliament prevails to the extent of the conflict.
(4) In each province, the legislature may make laws in relation to the raising of money by any mode or system of taxation in respect of
(a) non-renewable natural resources and forestry resources in the province and the primary production therefrom, and
(b) sites and facilities in the province for the generation of electrical energy and the production therefrom,
whether or not such production is exported in whole or in part from the province, but such laws may not authorize or provide for taxation that differentiates between production exported to another part of Canada and production not exported from the province.
(5) The expression “primary production” has the meaning assigned by the Sixth Schedule.
(6) Nothing in subsections (1) to (5) derogates from any powers or rights that a legislature or government of a province had immediately before the coming into force of this section.

93. In and for each Province the Legislature may exclusively make Laws in relation to Education, subject and according to the following Provisions:
(1) Nothing in any such Law shall prejudicially affect any Right or Privilege with respect to Denominational Schools which any Class of Persons have by Law in the Province at the Union;
(2) All the Powers, Privileges, and Duties at the Union by Law conferred and imposed in Upper Canada on the Separate Schools and School Trustees of the Queen’s Roman Catholic Subjects shall be and the same are hereby extended to the Dissentient Schools of the Queen’s Protestant and Roman Catholic Subjects in Quebec;
(3) Where in any Province a System of Separate or Dissentient Schools exists by Law at the Union or is thereafter established by the Legislature of the Province, an Appeal shall lie to the Governor General in Council from any Act or Decision of any Provincial Authority affecting any Right or Privilege of the Protestant or Roman Catholic Minority of the Queen’s Subjects in relation to Education;
(4) In case any such Provincial Law as from Time to Time seems to the Governor General in Council requisite for the due Execution of the Provisions of this Section is not made, or in case any Decision of the Governor General in Council on any Appeal under this Section is not duly executed by the proper Provincial Authority in that Behalf, then and in every such Case, and as far only as the Circumstances of each Case require, the Parliament of Canada may make remedial Laws for the due Execution of the Provisions of this Section and of any Decision of the Governor General in Council under this Section.

93A. Paragraphs (1) to (4) of section 93 do not apply to Quebec.
Demonstrate that you have more brain cells than God gave a turnip by educating yourself. Or wallow in the ignorance of your bayou backwater, your choice.
Wasn’t it you who on CSB that said that the Canadian government rules all.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:54 am
by Scooter
Oh yeah, that definitely sounds like something I would have said. :loon :loon :loon

Moron.

Re: The view from abroad

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:22 am
by liberty
Scooter wrote:Oh yeah, that definitely sounds like something I would have said. :loon :loon :loon

Moron.
Yea, I know you are real Jefferson, a real defender of liberty, not. You are a Jefferson all right, a George Jefferson.