Okay, let me make sure I've got this straight....
Gillard goes on a shock jock's program, (from what I've been able to find on the guy, he seems like the Australian Howard Stern) and she's
appalled by the fact that he asks questions...surprise surprise...that are shocking and outrageous...
Which is what the guy does for a living...
This is starting to look a little Machiavellian to me ...
It seems to me that the Prime Minister, in desperate political straights both within her party and with the electorate at large, is trying to rally support by making herself "the victim"...and deliberately putting herself in situations where she is likely to be the object of personal abuse to try to gain support by making people feel sorry for her...
She apparently sees this as her only path to political survival and electoral victory...
It's funny in a way, because in her effort to decry sexual stereotypes, she invites another one:
"cries like a little girl"....
I'm certainly no expert in the dynamics of Australian politics, but I can't imagine this strategy succeeding...
From all the polling I've seen, that rant at Abbott a few months ago did absolutely nothing to improve her political standing or the standing of her party, so you would think she would have learned from that experience that this "I'm the victim of sexist work place abuse, vote for me" approach is not the path to victory....
But by highlighting juvenile jokes made about her on a fund raising dinner menu, and then going on a shock jock's program and then being shocked that the shock jock shocks, she seems not to have learned this lesson...
Sexism in the workplace is a real problem, but at this level of politics, where you are the leader of the country, I suspect that the average person isn't much impressed with the argument...They expect you to be stronger then that...
As I'm fond of quoting from the late great Harry Hopkins, "politics ain't bean bag"....
People do not naturally rally to political leaders who portray themselves as victims, or who show themselves to be thin skinned types who can't take a joke...
I think Gillard is in danger of turning herself into a laughingstock...(if she hasn't already)
When a "big league" politician is made an object of ridicule over things like their personal appearance they have two good options...
They can either ignore it, and not bring more attention to it...(which is pretty much what Hillary Clinton does) or they can make light of it and poke fun at themselves (like Chris Christie)..
Crying like a little girl is not a good choice; it's unseemly and diminishing.... it makes you look very small and insecure...
"Small and insecure" may work if you're a celebrity with personal problems who's on the PR path to redemption, but they are not qualities that the public generally finds compelling in those who would run their country...
I've been trying to imagine how Margaret Thatcher would have dealt with this sort of thing...
It would probably have been a combination of poking fun at herself and turning the tables a bit by tossing the same sort of joking remarks about personal appearance right back at the guy who designed the menu, or the opposition leader...
She
certainly would not have cried like a little girl...