All who serve honourably deserve respect. I was not referring to the lack of a Japanese warning. I meant that those in service at Pearl Harbor did not join up in the (reasonably) certain knowledge that they would get shot at. This does not mean their deaths and injuries were any the less honourable and worth remembering. I simply have somewhat more awe of those who join up after hostilities exist; they put themselves knowingly in harm's way.Miles wrote:With respect for you opinion the fact remains that those attacked were American Military whether or not they were forewarned has little bearing. The intent of the Japanese was to give no warning of an attack or even a declaration of war. . . I come from a long line of military men including myself which in itself does not give me any more standing than anyone else . . .
I forgot Grandpa Wallbank - King's Liverpool Rifles in WW1 (sorry gramps) - who along with my dad (WW2) and my son (2 tours of Afghanistan and now in South Korea) are, in my opinion, twice the man I could hope to be. Hence my reply to oldr that (in my case at least) I am already half the man they were/are.
And I think it gives you a bit more standing Miles - your service, not theirs - although both should equally be honoured.
Meade


