James McCormick guilty of selling fake bomb detectors .
James McCormick, 56, of Langport, Somerset, is said to have made £50m from sales and sold more than 6,000 in Iraq, the Old Bailey heard.
Police said the devices, modelled on a novelty golf ball finder, are still in use at some checkpoints.
One Iraqi bomb victim described him to the BBC as a "morally bankrupt" man.
Continue reading the main story “Start QuoteBoth civilians and armed forces personnel were put at significant risk”
End Quote Det Insp Ed Heath Deputy senior investigating officer Fake bomb detectors 'destroyed lives'
During Tuesday's hearing at the Old Bailey in London, the court was told McCormick's detectors, which cost up to $40,000 (£27,000) each, were completely ineffectual and lacked any grounding in science.
Richard Whittam QC, for the prosecution, said: "The devices did not work and he knew they did not work."
McCormick had claimed the devices could bypass "all forms of concealment", detecting drugs and people along with explosives, the court heard.
He claimed they would work under water and from the air, and would track an object up to 1km (3280ft) below the ground.
The bomb detectors came with cards which were "programmed" to detect a wide array of substances, from ivory to $100 banknotes.
Other substances could be detected, it was claimed, if put in a jar with a sticker which would absorb its "vapours" and was then stuck on a card that would be read by the machine.
In reality, McCormick's device was based on $20 (£13) golf ball finders which he had purchased from the US and which had no working electronics.
Police said McCormick showed a complete disregard for the safety of those who used and relied upon the device for their own security and protection.
The court heard there was no evidence that McCormick had tried to sell the products to the Ministry of Defence.
BBC Two's Newsnight programme conducted an investigation into the devices sold by McCormick's company, resulting in a UK government ban on their sale in Iraq and Afghanistan in January 2010.
It found that senior Iraqi officials knew the devices did not work and it alleged some had received bribes to ensure they were purchased.
Iraq spent more than $40m (£26.2m) on 6,000 devices between 2008 and 2010, the programme said.
General Jihad al-Jabiri, the head of the Baghdad bomb squad, is currently serving a jail term for corruption, along with two other Iraqi officials.
One senior Iraqi official told the BBC that the useless devices had created a false sense of security - and that no punishment would make up for the blood that had been shed as a result.
BBC Newsnight also spoke to Haneen Alwan, an Iraqi woman who needed 59 operations after she was injured in a bomb blast in January 2009. She was two months pregnant at the time and lost her child.
She told the programme: "When people passed through checkpoints using these devices, they thought they would be safe, but they are useless. The man who sold them has no conscience. He is morally bankrupt. How could he sell them just for money and destroy other people's lives?"
Meanwhile, Avon and Somerset Constabulary's Det Insp Ed Heath told the BBC the devices had been used at numerous checkpoints in Iraq.
He said: "It is clear that both civilians and armed forces personnel were put at significant risk in relying upon this equipment.
"McCormick showed a complete disregard for the safety of those that used and relied upon the device for their own security and protection. He amassed many millions of pounds through his greed and criminal enterprise."
The force's Det Supt Nigel Rock described McCormick as a "conman", adding: "We have heard evidence from many, many experts, scientists, leaders in their field, who have said this was a fraud. A sham.
"That device has been used and is still being used on checkpoints. People using that device believe it works. It does not."
McCormick was remanded on conditional bail to be sentenced on 2 May
Wanker of the year award goes to...
Wanker of the year award goes to...
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
Shove an IED up his backside.
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
-
Grim Reaper
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:21 pm
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
I remember this asshole from a few years ago.
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
So what's his sentance going to be? A stern talking to?
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
-
oldr_n_wsr
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
No one tested this "device" before buying it?
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
From the story, it seems like official Iraqi corruption is the real problem, and the larger problem:
[BBC Two's Newsnight] found that senior Iraqi officials knew the devices did not work and it alleged some had received bribes to ensure they were purchased.
Iraq spent more than $40m (£26.2m) on 6,000 devices between 2008 and 2010, the programme said.
General Jihad al-Jabiri, the head of the Baghdad bomb squad, is currently serving a jail term for corruption, along with two other Iraqi officials.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
-
oldr_n_wsr
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
I have some dehydrated water to sell them.
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
I think both he, and whatever Iraqi official he was bribing to buy these things should both be sentenced to walking through a minefield...
With one of these "bomb detectors" to help them locate the mines...
With one of these "bomb detectors" to help them locate the mines...



Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
Like!!!
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
-
Grim Reaper
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:21 pm
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
And he's been sentenced to 10 years in prison.
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
Unfortunately it couldn't be more.
We have fixed maximum tariffs for crimes, 10 years was the maximum sentence that could be handed down for the crime of fraud.
I wonder if he feels any shame for the number of people that have died because of ordnance undiscovered by his "devices"?
We have fixed maximum tariffs for crimes, 10 years was the maximum sentence that could be handed down for the crime of fraud.
I wonder if he feels any shame for the number of people that have died because of ordnance undiscovered by his "devices"?
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
I doubt it very much.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
Was there not a possibility for consecutive sentencing for multiple counts? 6000 devices times 2 years per count served consecutively would have been a reasonable sentence.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
It seems to me that the law ought to be changed to provide harsher penalties for people who's fraud results in death or injuries...(particularly when that's a completely foreseeable consequence.)
There's a big difference between someone who's selling soap that claims to be "25% moisturizing cream" that turns out to only contain 10%, and something like this...
It doesn't seem right that they should be treated the same....
There's a big difference between someone who's selling soap that claims to be "25% moisturizing cream" that turns out to only contain 10%, and something like this...
It doesn't seem right that they should be treated the same....



Re: Wanker of the year award goes to...
Fraud?! Sounds to me like a clear-cut case of premeditated homicide!Daisy wrote:Unfortunately it couldn't be more.
We have fixed maximum tariffs for crimes, 10 years was the maximum sentence that could be handed down for the crime of fraud.
I wonder if he feels any shame for the number of people that have died because of ordnance undiscovered by his "devices"?
Treat Gaza like Carthage.