Topic Redacted

Joe Guy · Post by **Joe Guy** » Tue May 28, 2013 1:03 am

這是什麼意思？

dales · Post by **dales** » Tue May 28, 2013 1:18 am

010010000100010101001100010011000100111100100000010010100100111101000101

eta: if you're unable to translate binary code, the message simply sez......"Hello Joe"

Your Japanese is a little rusty

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Tue May 28, 2013 2:35 am

Sorry, I wasn't making myself very clear...

I wasn't implying the dales would post something so nasty, more that I see those as the only possible grounds for redaction. If all the stupidity on this board were redacted it'd become a very quiet place indeed!

dales · Post by **dales** » Tue May 28, 2013 3:21 am

Like this place?

http://cybersoapbox.net/

oldr_n_wsr · Post by **oldr_n_wsr** » Tue May 28, 2013 2:56 pm

Some people are so driven by their need to be correct at all times that they will argue with someone who refuses to argue with them.

That method ensures a victory for the only person arguing.

If he/she is still arguing, how can one declare a victory?

Joe Guy · Post by **Joe Guy** » Tue May 28, 2013 3:12 pm

oldr_n_wsr wrote:
Some people are so driven by their need to be correct at all times that they will argue with someone who refuses to argue with them.

That method ensures a victory for the only person arguing.
If he/she is still arguing, how can one declare a victory?

Victory is assumed by the arguer when there is no response.

dales · Post by **dales** » Tue May 28, 2013 3:52 pm

Victory is assumed by the arguer when there is no response.

That assumption could be in error, the other person let's the arguer proceed thru life with a half-baked idea of the universe.

oldr_n_wsr · Post by **oldr_n_wsr** » Tue May 28, 2013 3:59 pm

Victory is assumed by the arguer when there is no response.

Yet they continue to argue. Only at the conclusion can there be a victor. If they do not conclude, then there is no victor.

dales · Post by **dales** » Tue May 28, 2013 5:11 pm

The Argument Clinic

Joe Guy · Post by **Joe Guy** » Tue May 28, 2013 7:47 pm

oldr_n_wsr wrote:
Victory is assumed by the arguer when there is no response.
Yet they continue to argue. Only at the conclusion can there be a victor. If they do not conclude, then there is no victor.

Since there is no 'they' there is nothing to conclude.

MajGenl.Meade · Post by **MajGenl.Meade** » Wed May 29, 2013 6:29 am

[quote="Joe Guy]Victory is assumed by the arguer when there is no response.[/quote]

Hmm, I've always thought that if I just drone on and on without letting anyone else get a word in edgeways, until I start foaming at the mouth and falling over backwards and then there's no more answers it's either (a) everyone else got bored/died/went on vacation or (b) it was Taff tossing rocks and then refusing to discuss the ripples. Oh wait! Maybe I agree in the latter case.

Meade

oldr_n_wsr · Post by **oldr_n_wsr** » Wed May 29, 2013 1:01 pm

Throwing rocks is fun, especially if you live in a glass house.

Plan B Forum

Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted

Re: Topic Redacted