High profile trial No. 2

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
Post Reply
User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

High profile trial No. 2

Post by Guinevere »

The Commonwealth v. Aaron Hernandez opened this morning. 1100 Bristol County residents are appearing (I don't know how many were summonsed) to go through the jury selection process. It's expected to take 2 weeks, followed by 10+ weeks of trial. One winner in the pool- wearing a Bruins jersey - apparently yelled "Go Pats" in the courtroom this morning. He was excused and no sports apparel is allowed.

I haven't had time to really focus on the details, but it seems the case is not quite as winnable as initially thought (but then what case ever is). We shall see what develops.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: High profile trial No. 2

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

We got your Goa Pets right here
Image

I'm afraid that this trial too will indeed be an uphill struggle. The yahoo in the Pats shirt might have been more suitable than the fence-sitting bleeding hearts who will doubtless end up on the jury. Or is that too cynical?

Whatever - it is everyone's hope that justice is done and it's in everyone's interests too.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: High profile trial No. 2

Post by rubato »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:"... The yahoo in the Pats shirt might have been more suitable than the fence-sitting bleeding hearts who will doubtless end up on the jury. Or is that too cynical?

... .
It doesn't matter if it is cynical, it is ignorant.

I've been called for jury duty several times and in none of them did the selection process favor "fence-sitting bleeding hearts".

In the last one, a federal trial, the defense and prosecution worked out the jury selection between themselves and gave it to the judge who accepted their mutual selections.



yrs,
rubato

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: High profile trial No. 2

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply