Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood. If they do vote for statehood that does not mean they automatically get it; the next step would be for Congress to grant statehood by a majority vote. But should they get statehood? Puerto Rico is different than other territories; I know of no other territory that carried on an insurgency against he US for independence. What if they should gain statehood and the then later decide they want independence; what do we do then, sent troops to kill Puerto Ricans?
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.
Re: Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
Where, I can't do links, I am not smart enough.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.
Re: Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
Never mind; I found it.liberty wrote:Where, I can't do links, I am not smart enough.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9823
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas
Re: Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
That's exactly what we did last time the question came up, back in 1861. A little something called "The War of the Rebellion" (or if you were one of the rebels, "The War of Northern Aggression").liberty wrote:What if they should gain statehood and the then later decide they want independence; what do we do then, sent troops to kill Puerto Ricans?
I can't understand how you missed it. It was in all the papers.
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Today Puerto Rico Will Vote On Statehood
And wait! That's not all we get...

“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”
Re: Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
Here's More!
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
First, labelling a few sporadic attacks as "an insurgency" is beyond hyperbole.
Second, you never demonstrate your ignorance quite so clearly as when you spout such nonsense about your own country's history that even a foreigner can identify it as utter bullshit. No other territory has engaged in insurgency against the U.S.? Even just sticking to those areas which were legally territories at the time:
There was the Philippine-American War.
There was the "Confederate Territory of Arizona" carved out of the southern half of what was then New Mexico Territory by a secession convention, and whose troops waged war against the United States. It later became part of the states of Arizona and New Mexico
There were, in that same period, both pro-United States and pro-Confederacy factions in what was then Indian territory, and those who supported the Confederacy took up arms against the United States. Indian territory became part of the state of Oklahoma.
So remind us again how Puerto Rico, is so "different than [sic] other territories"?
I spoke only about areas that were legally designated territories, because the village idiot is too stupid to realize the depths of his own hypocrisy by continually carping about territories that take up arms against the United States, when his own state plus several more engaged in widespread treason against the United States.
I would ask the village idiot, who won't have the integrity or the courage to answer, who owes more loyalty to the United States? Is it the states who joined voluntarily, and then took up arms against the very institutions they vowed to "preserve, protect and defend"? Or is it territories that were annexed to the United States by force, and that in many cases were denied some or all of the privileges of citizens of the United States?
Reading the ravings of this product of multiple generations of Confederate inbreeders makes me wonder if it would have been better if a few million Confederates had been left hanging from trees in every corner of the South.
Second, you never demonstrate your ignorance quite so clearly as when you spout such nonsense about your own country's history that even a foreigner can identify it as utter bullshit. No other territory has engaged in insurgency against the U.S.? Even just sticking to those areas which were legally territories at the time:
There was the Philippine-American War.
There was the "Confederate Territory of Arizona" carved out of the southern half of what was then New Mexico Territory by a secession convention, and whose troops waged war against the United States. It later became part of the states of Arizona and New Mexico
There were, in that same period, both pro-United States and pro-Confederacy factions in what was then Indian territory, and those who supported the Confederacy took up arms against the United States. Indian territory became part of the state of Oklahoma.
So remind us again how Puerto Rico, is so "different than [sic] other territories"?
I spoke only about areas that were legally designated territories, because the village idiot is too stupid to realize the depths of his own hypocrisy by continually carping about territories that take up arms against the United States, when his own state plus several more engaged in widespread treason against the United States.
I would ask the village idiot, who won't have the integrity or the courage to answer, who owes more loyalty to the United States? Is it the states who joined voluntarily, and then took up arms against the very institutions they vowed to "preserve, protect and defend"? Or is it territories that were annexed to the United States by force, and that in many cases were denied some or all of the privileges of citizens of the United States?
Reading the ravings of this product of multiple generations of Confederate inbreeders makes me wonder if it would have been better if a few million Confederates had been left hanging from trees in every corner of the South.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
-
Burning Petard
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
- Location: Near Bear, Delaware
Re: Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
Yesterday, about one-fourth the eligible voters on this island commonwealth of the USofA voted in a non-binding referendum. Among the on-line newspapers I read it received slight coverage in the months before the vote. In my reading it will have no impact on things at the US congress. This vote was intended (one local news story said it was conducted at a cost to the local taxpayer of eleven million dollars.) to promote and build support for the agenda of the recently elected head of the commonwealth government. Recent pronouncements by the Supremes have called into question the nature of that commonwealth relationship which had been pretty stable for the last 60 years.
snailgate
snailgate
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Today Puerto Rico will vote on statehood
Yes, the Supremes did predict that Puerto Rico would someday join the United States:Recent pronouncements by the Supremes have called into question the nature of that commonwealth relationship which had been pretty stable for the last 60 years.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God