Non Appetit.

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 31117
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Non Appetit.

Post by Gob »

You might never have come across Bon Appetit, a glossy monthly magazine which serves up a cosy mix of gourmet recipes, wine reviews and lifestyle tips to its 1.5 million readers.

It is hard to imagine a less controversial publication, or one that's more quintessentially American with its aspirational blend of self-improvement and conspicuous consumption – and it has been attracting record digital subscriptions thanks to lockdown tips for banana bread and avocado toast.

But popularity counted for nothing when a picture appeared online showing its editor of ten years, Adam Rapoport, dressed as a Puerto Rican at a Halloween fancy dress party. At a stroke he was out, branded a racist.

Image

Then, in a grovelling mea culpa, he confessed: 'From an extremely ill-conceived Halloween costume 16 years ago to my blind spots as an editor, I've not championed an inclusive vision.' He added he was stepping down 'to reflect on the work that I need to do as a human being and to allow Bon Appetit to get to a better place.'

Never mind his successful record as an editor. Or that the picture was taken in 2004, a full six years before he joined the magazine. Or that Mr Rapoport denies applying make-up. Or that he is actually married to the Puerto Rican woman pictured alongside him in the photograph.

But nothing can be taken for granted amid the toxic maelstrom now sweeping through American journalism, from the lofty heights of the New York Times to the least consequential website. They're calling it The Great Awokening and it endangers not just thousands of experienced, hard-working reporters and editors but the future of the industry they work for. It even threatens American democracy itself.

This is a country where freedom of speech and religion are guaranteed under the First Amendment. But it is also a nation where the statues of Washington and Jefferson, the great architects of the Republic, the guarantors of the liberties that woke warriors take for granted, have been pulled to the ground and smeared with graffiti.

America brought popular journalism and the true scrutiny of power to the world, yet never have the country's newsrooms been so threatened – or so cowed – as today. So great is the pressure to conform to messages put forward by movements such as Black Lives Matter and #MeToo that any deviation leads to instant vilification online. And, ultimately, the chopping block.

One exasperated newspaper editor told The Mail on Sunday: 'There is a revolution going on in newsrooms across the US and it goes against everything freedom of the press stands for.

'Surely the whole point is to tell both sides of a story, even if it means publishing the views of someone who doesn't believe the things you do? Well, in today's culture all that is out the window.'

The prevailing atmosphere is so toxic that white writers are now fearful of publishing anything controversial in case it kills their career. One long-time editor at a major East Coast publication said: 'No one is against change and everyone realises white middle-aged men have dominated editorial boardrooms for too long. But this 'Great Awokening' is causing irreparable damage.

'Newspapers such as the New York Times have always prided themselves on publishing 'All the news that's fit to print'. And that means telling both sides of a story in a fair and impartial way.

'The Times has always been liberal but now the woke brigade is eating its own. It's happening in publications large and small.'

The bodies are piling up. Stan Wischnowski, a Pulitzer-prize winning 20-year veteran of the Philadelphia Inquirer, was forced to quit as senior vice president and executive editor after publishing an article with the headline 'Buildings matter, too' about the effects of protests on the city's historic buildings.

Dozens of black and minority staff members walked out of the 191-year-old newspaper in disgust at the headline for playing on the rallying cry 'Black Lives Matter'. They signed 'an open letter from journalists of colour', which read: 'We're tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age.

'We're tired of being told of the progress the company has made and being served platitudes about 'diversity and inclusion' when we raise our concerns. We're tired of seeing our words and photos twisted to fit a narrative that does not reflect our reality. We're tired of being told to show both sides of issues there are no two sides of. Things need to change.'

British-born anti-Trump conservative Andrew Sullivan is another casualty. He resigned from New York magazine last month after four years. In his final column he explained he was leaving to start his own online blog because he misses writing freely 'without being in a defensive crouch'. He lambasted America's mainstream media for its lack of contrary opinion and revealed that a 'critical mass' of staff at the magazine refused to work with him because of his critiques of 'woke' culture.

Mr Sullivan, 56, said: 'This is increasingly the orthodoxy in the mainstream media, that any writer not actively committed to critical theory in questions of race, gender, sexual orientation and gender identity is actively, physically harming co-workers merely by existing in the same virtual space. 'I miss just the sheer fun that used to be part of being a hack before all these dreadfully earnest, humour-free puritans took over the press.'

He accused US media of putting 'the moral clarity of some self-appointed saints before the goal of objectivity in reporting'. And he cited George Orwell who said: 'If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.'

No one, it seems, is safe. Anna Wintour, editor-in-chief of American Vogue and long considered the most powerful female figure in US publishing, was forced to issue an extraordinary statement taking 'personal responsibility' for not encouraging more diversity at the fashion bible. 'I want to say plainly that I know Vogue has not found enough ways to elevate and give space to black editors, writers, photographers, designers and other creators,' confessed London-born Wintour, the model for the icy, stiletto-sharp editrix in The Devil Wears Prada.

'We have made mistakes, too, publishing images or stories that have been hurtful or intolerant. I take full responsibility.'

Wintour insists that she is going nowhere. But rumours of her imminent demise continue to swirl, with the editor of British Vogue, Edward Enninful, hotly tipped to replace her.

Nothing perhaps sums up the mood of ugly intolerance so well as the plight of the New York Times. Founded in 1851, the Times is an American cultural institution, nicknamed 'The Gray Lady' for its reputation as a sober and impartial paper of record.

But when it hired Bari Weiss to give an opposing view to the newspaper's Left-of-centre politics, she was bullied by colleagues who branded her a 'Nazi and a racist' on social media.

'The lessons that ought to have followed the election [of Donald Trump in 2016] – lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society – have not been learned,' she said.

'Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn't a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.

'My work and my character are openly demeaned on company-wide [message boards] where masthead editors regularly weigh in. There, some co-workers insist I need to be rooted out if this company is to be truly 'inclusive', while others post axe emojis next to my name.'

Her resignation came on the same day as James Bennett quit as opinion editor after publishing a piece by Republican Senator Tom Cotton which urged President Trump to send in troops to quell continuing Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests.

A source said: 'This was something being widely discussed in Washington but it was deemed a subject too dangerous for the opinion pages of the New York Times.'

Times workers threatened a walkout with employees mass-tweeting the sentence: 'Running this puts Black @NYTimes staff in danger.'

Publisher AG Sulzberger initially defended Bennett saying 'I believe in the principle of openness to a range of opinions, even those we may disagree with,' but, within 24 hours, he bowed to the mob, issuing a grovelling apology saying 'the essay fell short of our standards.'

Katie Kingsbury, the acting head of the opinion pages, told staff: 'Anyone who sees any piece of opinion journalism, headlines, social posts, photos – you name it – that gives you the slightest pause, please call or text me immediately. That's right, all Times employees are now empowered to report on those who deviate from the new moral mission.' A former New York Times journalist told The Mail on Sunday: 'The irony is the Times was enjoying a renaissance after President Trump got elected. Circulation figures were rising and online readership boomed. In Trump they had an easy target and one their readership enjoyed reading about.

'But their wokeness and desire to be painfully politically correct has misfired. The idea that the Times is on a 'new moral mission' is insulting to those of us who devoted years of our lives to the pursuit of excellence, to accurately reporting stories, all sides of them. You can't censure opposing opinion just because you don't agree with it.

'The worst thing now is that wokeness is creeping into the news agenda. There are no stories criticising the BLM movement because writers and editors live in fear of losing their livelihood if the mob comes after them. How can you run a newspaper that way? The answer is, you can't.'

What, then, of Bon Appetit, the cookery magazine that found itself in such hot water? The publication has now apologised to its readers for publishing recipes from a 'white-centric viewpoint' and promised to hire more BIPOC staff, meaning Black, Indigenous and People Of Colour.

Today the lead item on the website features a place called Riot Ribs, a 'mutual aid kitchen' at the centre of the continuing Black Lives Matter unrest in Portland.

Perhaps the final word should go to Barack Obama, America's first black President, who has warned: 'One of the things I do worry about among progressives in the United States is a certain kind of rigidity where we say 'Uh, I'm sorry, this is how it's going to be' and then we start sometimes creating what's called a 'circular firing squad', where you start shooting at your allies because one of them has strayed from purity.

'Change is complex and the world is messy. People who do really good stuff have flaws.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 3064
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

I don't know if there is more to the story about Adam Rapoport but it seems ridiculous on the face of it. A friend of mine once played Yum Yum in a production of The Mikado: as he is neither female nor Japanese he must live in fear that the photographs will come out and he will be ruined.

I saw the NYT op-ed from Cotton: it was a nasty intemperate piece. But I was pleased that I could read it because I want to see how these assholes 'think.' NYT says that one reason the editor was blameworthy was that there were untruths in the piece which were not challenged. We should be used to that by now: I want to read or see what this idiot president says because so much of is obvious mendacity that I really don't need a weatherman. I can see which way the wind is blowing.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 13616
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by BoSoxGal »

Definitely not worthy of being posted twice.
@realDonaldTrump, your mouth is the foulest shithole in the world! ~ Vicente Fox Quesada

Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States, IMPEACHED by the House of Representatives December 18, 2019.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 10860
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by Joe Guy »

This makes me think that if the current prevalence of social justice victims had existed in the 80s and Twitter and Facebook had been around, I could have destroyed my brother's career and reputation if I posted a picture I have of him dressed as Michael Jackson at a Halloween party.

I really missed out on a good blackmail, I mean extortion opportunity. But we weren't woke back then. It took a lot of time and hurt feelings to accomplish wokeness.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 5855
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Onalaska, Wi (suburb of La Crosse)

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Not saying that you should do it, Joe, but with just that one picture tweeted in the right place you probably still could.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 3785
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by TPFKA@W »

We used to sit in mud and coat ourselves as kids. I apologize for it now.
su·pe·ri·or·i·ty com·plex
noun
noun: superiority complex

an attitude of superiority which conceals actual feelings of inferiority and failure.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 10860
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by Joe Guy »

TPFKA@W wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 12:02 am
We used to sit in mud and coat ourselves as kids. I apologize for it now.
It's always a good idea to apologize for all of the stuff you did as a child that might have offended somebody if they witnessed it but if you really want to be taken seriously, you need to Tweet how sorry you are and quit your job.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 31117
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by Gob »

I once went to a party as a pirate, I'd like to sincerely apologise to anyone of Barbary or Albanian ancestry for my cultural appropriation.

I also once, went to a party dressed as Boy George, I would like to apologise to any gay people, especially Scooter, for my lack of cultural sensitivity.
boy.jpg
I'll go outside and shoot myself, after I've finished this cuppa.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Long Run
Posts: 5698
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:47 pm

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by Long Run »

Gob wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 7:54 am
I'll go outside and shoot myself, after I've finished this cuppa.
We'd rather you shoot your typical country side/coastal views. ;)

Big RR
Posts: 11335
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by Big RR »

My wife is of Puerto Rican descent and I have been around Puerto Ricans (both here and in Puerto Rico) for nearly 50 years, and I never would have guessed he was supposed to be dressed as a Puerto Rican; I would have guessed more some kind of NYC guido (another stereotype, but one which would have generated less loudly proclaimed offense).

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 31117
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by Gob »

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 17505
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Bloemfontein

Re: Non Appetit.

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

On one party occasion, my wife and I went as Siamese twins. I sewed two nylon windbreakers together. Everybody laughed and I regret not taking the opportunity then or since to help educate the world as to the prejudice that Siamese twins experience. Both of them.
No use crying, talking to a stranger. Naming the sorrow you've seen. Too many bad times, too many sad times. Nobody knows what you mean

Post Reply