Was This a Hate Crime?

[MajGenl.Meade]

I cannot see how SH or Sue, or anyone else in this country at least, would think that a woman or a girl does not have the unlimited, unquestionable right to say no.

Unsurprisingly, lib doubles down on his hate crime.

How is that hate? It seems fairly accurate to me, at least it matched my prediction.

a. your "prediction" was that you "already knew" how two posters would respond = "I already know what they would say: She had it coming. She should not have been a racist. She was a racist because she rejected him"

b. Neither one of them has said (or did say or ever would say) those things. Your prediction is pure hatred from you toward them for no better reason that you lie.

c. you then go on to ascribe to them a false position = that they would, in fact, think a woman or a girl does not have the right to say 'no'. Don't hide behind "I cannot see how . . ." because that merely implies that you think they think that way but you can't explain it.

d. you then claim this matches your prediction as if (1) they had said it and (2) your prediction was anything other than total bullshit lying rudeness (or more), thus proving your hatred at the next level. Still below a muskrat's asshole but another level.

[Joe Guy]

.....Now, why am I “racist ”? Could it be that I refuse to be colorblind? I see what I see. And furthermore, if I can see it, measure it, and make predictions from it, then it’s real......

Is this the first time you've admitted here that you're a racist? I don't think I've read all of your comments, so I may have missed it.

I left out a dash or two, but I did use a question mark in the sentence “Now, why am I ‘racist’?” A question mark makes it an interrogative sentence, not a declarative one, so I’m not admitting anything, I’m asking a question. It seems that, given your advanced education from an Ivy League institution, you should know that.

You asked 'Now, why am I racist?' and followed it with what appears to be an explanation of why you're racist. I reckoned that's what y'all was meanin'.

[liberty]

.....Now, why am I “racist ”? Could it be that I refuse to be colorblind? I see what I see. And furthermore, if I can see it, measure it, and make predictions from it, then it’s real......

Is this the first time you've admitted here that you're a racist? I don't think I've read all of your comments, so I may have missed it.

I left out a dash or two, but I did use a question mark in the sentence “Now, why am I ‘racist’?” A question mark makes it an interrogative sentence, not a declarative one, so I’m not admitting anything, I’m asking a question. It seems that, given your advanced education from an Ivy League institution, you should know that.

You asked 'Now, why am I racist?' and followed it with what appears to be an explanation of why you're racist. I reckoned that's what y'all was meanin'.

Well, Joe, let me ask you this question: would you push the button? Read the excerpt below.


https://www.wired.com/2007/12/ps-dna/
"Tony Clayton, a black man and a prosecutor who tried one of the Baton Rouge murder cases, concedes the benefits of the test: "Had it not been for Frudakis, we would still be looking for the white guy in the white pickup." Nevertheless, Clayton says he dislikes anything that implies we don't all "bleed the same blood." He adds, "If I could push a button and make this technology disappear, I would."

There will always be people who misuse science and statistics, and some genuinely believe that Black people are genetically predisposed to commit crime. They often point to the fact that Black Americans are involved in a disproportionate share of reported crime.

However, I do not believe this is because of genetics. I live in an area with many Black residents, I know quite a few personally, and none of them are habitual criminals.

It is true that Black Americans are overrepresented in crime statistics, but the evidence suggests this is driven by social and environmental factors that have developed over the last half century. These environments can promote disorder, instability, and criminal behavior. Negative cultural patterns can take root when communities face long‑term poverty, when people do not believe they can get ahead in any other way, or when a lack of confidence limits opportunity.

The good news is that cultures and environments can change. People across the political spectrum sometimes use these issues to reinforce their own biases, whether liberal or conservative. But we should not let ignorance or prejudice interfere with the evolution of science, even if it challenges someone’s sacred beliefs, because in the end scientific development can make the world a better place.

If genetic profiling disturbs you, this is really going to drive you crazy: I believe that in the not‑too‑distant future, an AI‑driven computer program and printer will be able to analyze an individual’s DNA and generate an image of the person’s most likely appearance. Think about that for a moment; does that not make you want to scream “racism”?

[BoSoxGal]

If genetic profiling disturbs you, this is really going to drive you crazy: I believe that in the not‑too‑distant future, an AI‑driven computer program and printer will be able to analyze an individual’s DNA and generate an image of the person’s most likely appearance. Think about that for a moment; does that not make you want to scream “racism”?

This technology already exists, it’s called forensic DNA phenotyping and has been used in multiple criminal cases to render a likely perpetrator sketch from DNA left by the perpetrator at the crime scene or on/in the victim.

You can read about it here: Phenotyping: How a DNA 'Snapshot' Can Create the Face of an Unknown Criminal

[liberty]

If genetic profiling disturbs you, this is really going to drive you crazy: I believe that in the not‑too‑distant future, an AI‑driven computer program and printer will be able to analyze an individual’s DNA and generate an image of the person’s most likely appearance. Think about that for a moment; does that not make you want to scream “racism”?

This technology already exists, it’s called forensic DNA phenotyping and has been used in multiple criminal cases to render a likely perpetrator sketch from DNA left by the perpetrator at the crime scene or on/in the victim.

You can read about it here: Phenotyping: How a DNA 'Snapshot' Can Create the Face of an Unknown Criminal

Well, doggone, the technology is moving faster than I can keep up. My electronic handheld sniffing tracker can’t be too far behind, a bloodhound in a box. I still think it may be a while, a few years or a few decades, before science can manage to do that.