I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by Rick »

Justifying an action kinda presupposes an action has been taken.

One doesn't have to justify an action that has not been taken.

Mostly they pat themselves on the back and say "what a good boy I am"...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by Andrew D »

But one does have to prove that it would have been taken. Even if it hasn't.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by dales »

keld feldspar wrote:One can deny it if one wishes but the human animal justifies every action it takes.

It's the nature of the beast...
I am NOT an animal, I am a FREE man! :ok

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by Rick »

Andrew D wrote:But one does have to prove that it would have been taken. Even if it hasn't.
True

However you have pointed out that safe guards are in place in the event that certain actions do take place (at least in the legal system). Are not these safe guards put in place by the very same folks that would be their abusers?

Granted, could happen doesn't mean did happen, so why the rules? Is that not proof in and of itself, at least in the general sense?

As per the OP "subjective truth" and "frequency of it's abuse" is in the eye of the beholder.

You stated that one acquaintance would "never", in his eyes once would be impermissible...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by Rick »

dales wrote:
keld feldspar wrote:One can deny it if one wishes but the human animal justifies every action it takes.

It's the nature of the beast...
I am NOT an animal, I am a FREE man! :ok
FREE range...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by rubato »

Once again, I would recommend reading "Mistakes were made but not by me" Elliot Aronson or his text book "The Social Animal".

As well as the book I referenced above.

There has been a lot of very interesting social psychology research in this area.

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by Rick »

http://www.michaelshermer.com/the-believing-brain/
we are also more capable than any other species of self-deception and illusion
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by rubato »

dales wrote:
keld feldspar wrote:One can deny it if one wishes but the human animal justifies every action it takes.

It's the nature of the beast...
I am NOT an animal, I am a FREE man! :ok

Partially true. Possibly.

I think it is one of the tasks of human existence to free ourselves and to maintain our freedom to the degree we can. But I don't believe anyone achieves this except in degree. Freedom exists only in service of something else, not the abstract, and it is yet another task to determine what that is.

Ultimate freedom is the ability to choose how we will be bound. There is no choice in the real world not to be bound.

yrs,
rubato

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by rubato »

keld feldspar wrote:http://www.michaelshermer.com/the-believing-brain/
we are also more capable than any other species of self-deception and illusion
How would we detect self-deception or illusion in another species?

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: I'm Curious. What Do You Think?

Post by loCAtek »

Blush response?


There are all kinds of cops; I've known police officers, security officers, private investigators, public safety(my mom worked for them) sheriffs, detectives, SWAT members, executive body guards, MP's (Marines are the worst!) and had to deal with one or two NCIS, or FBI. (None of them like Hollywierd suggests)

Yea, human is about right. I've known cops who are chronic speeders, swindlers, abusers and cheaters, etc. ...all while being fine law enforcement officials.

They're people after all.

Post Reply