Ish RR - yes they do but they do not exist to make life easy for any Tom Dick or Harry to play fast and loose with responsible dog ownership and rely upon others to clean up their mess whilst they move on to the next cute bundle of fluff whose early development they can mess up creating mature dogs in need of behavioral training.Big RR wrote:But RB, isn't that a reason organizations like the RSPCA exist, to provide people like aardy an alternative to having their pet euthanized and to offer the pet another chance? I know I support my local SPCA for that very reason; the alternatives of people killing dogs or letting them loose is not a viable one--we need organizations which will provide this alternative an I (and millions of others are more than happy to donate to ehlp this happen).Again without wishing to appear unsympathetic you have said yourself that the dog had a behaviour issue caused by a change in it's living conditions which you yourself don't have the time to spend on working on with him, with all due respect you have then handed those issues over to someone else to solve and put the time and effort and expense in that you cannot, can you not see that to the RSPCA workers thats hardly going to make you appear someone deserving of sympathy? There are things that can be done to rehabilitate him which you don't have the time to do, and it's for that reason why the shelter workers wouldn't have been all that kindly towards you as all they see is that the dog is being handed over because his owner doesn't have time for him any more.
Believe me I am not suggesting that applies to aardy, but is very much is a huge factor in why people at the sharp end of rescue are cynical about peoples motives because sadly many people we deal with ARE serial re homers and will blatantly lie or spin a sob story to get the rescue to feel sorry for them and take their unwanted dog off their hands, or who got a puppy because it looked cute in 1001 Dalmatians or Britney Spears has one just like it but who are ill prepared and totally unwilling to deal with the adult dog which the cute puppy turns into. And dont get me started on the backyard breeders churning out litter after litter of pups only to hand over their worn out breeding stock or unsold older pups for you and I and other animal welfare supporters to pay for (thats if they don't just kill the poor dogs when they are done being profitable for them).
Then there are the many people who think that it's a good idea to let little princess have just 1 litter - after all she's sooooo cute and such a good dog, yet they give very little thought to the costs involved or what they will do with the pups they can't find homes for - I know lets give them to a rescue to deal with problem solved.
Yes there ARE many genuine people with genuine reasons to rehome their dogs and thank goodness RSPCA, Dogs Trust and the many many other small independent rescues are out there for those people and those dogs, but for every genuine rehomer I would suspect the rescue has dealt with a dozen others who aren't - small wonder then that nice people sometimes get treated a bit brusquely or suspiciously. It's amazing how when you ask someone why they are surrendering a dog you get told one thing and when you say ah well have you perhaps considered trying A B or C? They suddenly remember that yes they have already tried that and it didn't work, so you say OK what about D E F? and my goodness they tried that too but had forgotten to mention it ...
Its a fine line for rescues between biting their lip and saying nothing making it easy to hand over a dog and indirectly contributing to the problem, or speaking their mind and risking that next time the unwanted dog might just be abandoned or even killed. They don't always get it right but you can't really blame them for not always being sympathetic.