So you'd much rather not have an extended appeals process to be sure the sentence was properly given? Why? To save some money? We waste billions on a lot of less important things; when the government is killing someone, I think we should at least make sure the law is properly complied with.Good for the taxpayers. Unfortunately, with mandatory appeals, it will probably cost them millions anyway.
As for a governor commuting the sentence--isn't the pardon/commutation/power given to the executive to allow the people to have the final say through the political process? I'm not a big fan of it in many circumstances (like the pardoning of cronies before the executive leaves office, something done by persons in both parties), but here I can see that the public elected the governor whose beliefs on when capital punishment is appropriate are usually known it makes some sense.



