Lo's Inquisition

[dales]

In CA the ex gets it ALL!

[Joe Guy]

In California, any property, including real estate, that you owned before the marriage is your separate property after the marriage ends if you don't ever put it in your spouse's name.

Everything that you saved or bought together is 50/50.

[dales]

Never divorced, Joe?

[Joe Guy]

You obviously had a corrupt lawyer when you went through it...

[dales]

On a more or less serious note:

My ex got half my pension (California Community Property law) and at the time I felt screwed.

It's been a dozen years.

Now, I don't care, she has her life and I have mine.

My the good Lord bless her.

[Gob]

Before someone/anyone comes on here and starts tut tutting over the way Lo has been indulged in her attempts to gain attention treated, let's go to the tape.

On Mon Jul 23, 2012 this thread ceased to be active, following PMSP's post.

wow, thx! and I was so worried. Very gracious of you to 'give him up'.

Now that that is settled, thanks to everyone inconvenienced and I appreciate your patience.

Which should have been the end of it.

On Mon Aug 06, 2012, exactly three weeks later, Lo decided to open this thread again with a swipe at PMSP.



A few posts, indicating the lack of interest in this thread or its revival, were posted, so Lo decided to up that ante, by quoting a post from Hen, posted on Mon Jul 23, 2012, over three weeks prior, and then accusing her of;

You're OK with Domestic Violence? Really? Okay, you go ahead and feel free to enjoy getting punched in the face, and pulled around by your hair; I'm glad you like that kind of thing for yourself. Me, not so much. So, I called the cops.

When, of course, Hen had said nothing, not the slightest bit in any way, of the sort.

Several posts clearly showing Lo how SHE was the one guilty of doing everything she accused PMSP of, followed, along with requests that she withdraw her slur against Hen.

Lo then went on to post even more fantastical slurs against her ex, while claiming that she wanted this to end, and was told in no uncertain terms by many, that she was NOT believed or believable.

Like this;

...regardless, that I show no interest in him.

That's what this is about; my stalker wants me to acknowledge him; negatively or not.
Negative attention on me, doesn't validate him, but devalues the haters.

So, sorry.

Carry on.

Of course, she cannot resist trying to up the antagonism, so she tried this again, with me this time;

Good thing, I didn't say that, again.
However, why do you think I should have? Is it your opinion that those subjected to domestic violence somehow deserved it?

Of course I said, and believe no such things; (Though I do believe that even Gandhi would have difficulty from refraining from slapping Lo if he was left alone with her for an hour. )

Lo then spent five pages making accusations on her ex, including reposting stories from long past, with minimal input from others, yet she constantly claimed to be "wanting it to end."

Sean put it best;

Let me lay it out straight for you lo...

Your husband left you.
You are accusing him of beating you.
You are such an ingrained liar that some here have trouble believing your version of events.
He got the better of you in the divorce settlement.
You whinge about it and accuse him of stealing from you and your own lawyer of corruption.
You do, however, fail to recognise your own stupidity in accepting the settlement.
He is laughing all the way to the bank and seemingly content in his current relationship.
You are bitter and twisted and lashing out at all and sundry when they question your lies.

Sean also points out the silliness of Lo's claims, using her own words, and how her current positions are totally legally untenable. He also points out that Lo's desire to "move on" from her ex and PMSP is seriously compromised by the other threads she has started recently about him.

Lo has been excluded for a period once already, it seems she learned nothing from that.

If you wish to apportion blame therefore, look at who re-started this thread, constantly aggravated further, insulted without cause or reason people in it, and maintained the "discussion", please.

[Sean]

Actually, your savings and your property are both assets, which are seperate to income.

Some states here (no idea how Cali does it) actually DO look at savings and property separately.

Granted Jarl but my point was that savings and income would be separate issues.

[Sean]

In CA the ex gets it ALL!

Well as both parties would be considered an ex Dales I think it only right and proper that between them they would get it all.

[dales]

[loCAtek]

Easy enough to fudge: tell the bank that you think someone rifled your trash, you need to get a different account number. Presto--account was opened at a later date!

Thanks Jarlaxle, some are trying to suggest I should have done my lawyer's job, and investigated that possiblity.

[loCAtek]

Meh, I thought it was funny and sean left out the whole abusive domestic violence thing. He thinks that didn't happen, when I talked to you Gob, and quite a few others about it offline. Why don't you bring him up to speed?
Certainly Hen knows, which is why I was baffled why she'd say she was sure he wasn't that bad. If a violent abusive man isn't that bad to her; what does it take?

[Sean]

Actually lo, I left it out on the main because it wasn't pertinent to the question of whether or not he stole money from you (BTW the answer is no, he didn't).

As to whether or not I believe you about the domestic abuse, I tend to take people as I find them and I have found you to be a liar. Anyway, didn't think you cared about whether or not anybody here believed you...

[loCAtek]

My investigating lawyer disagrees with you; you must have missed that thread. As stated, you can confirm my domestic abuse with other sources, such as Gob or Hen, I mainly care about the facts, and not the popularity contests.

[Sean]

Really? You seem to care a lot about whether or not I believe you right now...

[loCAtek]

I'm reposting the facts, so that your myths aren't perpetuated as factual. No, this isn't about you, sorry.

[Gob]

So she carries it on.

I think you are a liar Lo, why should I believe anything you have said now, or in the past.

You have shot to fuck any credibility, sympathy, or care about you that I may or may not have once had.

That is your doing, though you will never admit any responsibility for it.

[The Hen]

I can neither confirm or deny any domestic violence experienced by Lo within her relationships. I have never discussed any such situations with her.

[Econoline]

Enough.

Isn't there ANYONE else here willing to say that:

(1) None of this shit is any of our business.

(2) None of this shit would have come up if loCAtek's ex-husband and his current girlfriend hadn't started cyberstalking her here on this discussion board.

(3) Given the fact that (2) has happened, it's perfectly understandable that Lo is a bit unnerved/rattled/freaked out/defensive.

(4) Yes, there are plenty of inconsistencies and unanswered questions (more and more, as the days go by) in both Lo's and PMSP's stories, but...well, see (1).

(5) Enough.



P.S. I have not previously posted in this thread, and I will not be drawn into posting again.

[Crackpot]

problem is 2 didn't happen.

[The Hen]

Econoline :

1. Agreed, and I have said as much.
2. As Crackpot says, didn't happen. At least not here, and no evidence has been provided for elsewhere.
3. As 2 didn't happen, (at least not here, and no evidence has been provided for elsewhere), it seems strange that 3 has occurred. Unless you look at the timing and this incident in Lo's "life" occurring right after she was getting nowhere in baiting me with her lies and fantasies any more. Then it would appear that this was a good springboard for someone's drama-fix.
4. PMS Princess has not posted any inconsistencies in her story. She has hardly touched on it at all. Seems to me that PMS Princess also agrees with number 1. Lo? not so much.
5. Agreed.