I'm having trouble understanding why someone who believes she is being stalked would continue to write about all of her personal problems at a BBS where her alleged stalker lurks and reads her posts.
While from time to time commenting to others that it's not all about them.
Well... duh.
It's all about LoCA.
I'm also having a problem with some people agreeing that LoCa is being stalked. Doesn't stalking require someone to harass or intimidate another person? If that has happened here, I missed it. Further, a person believing she is being stalked doesn't make it so.
If stalking is actually happening and I missed everything that happened, why not contact the authorities and report it? I don't think that the neutral counsel person is helping any.
You may recall there once was a certain quad-person that used to post here. It didn't take a lot of effort to stop him once he crossed the line. You just need to talk to the right people.
Lo's Inquisition
Re: Lo's Inquisition
Page 9?On page 9
Really dude?
Oldr, that is so two weeks ago....
If you really want to get the flavor of what's going on here with this, Page 9 is where you start....
Re: Lo's Inquisition
I'm holding out for page 37.
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Lo's Inquisition
Well, if prior performance is any indication, you should see that by Monday noon, at the latest...I'm holding out for page 37.
Re: Lo's Inquisition
Older: or showing backbone and being abused harder, because you were standing up to him. When he couldn't get your servitude, he took your money.
No, monitering is ample enough;Joe Guy wrote:.Doesn't stalking require someone to harass or intimidate another person?
In "A Study of Stalkers" Mullen et al.. (2000)[16] identified five types of stalkers:
Rejected stalkers pursue their victims in order to reverse, correct, or avenge a rejection (e.g. divorce, separation, termination).
Resentful stalkers pursue a vendetta because of a sense of grievance against the victims – motivated mainly by the desire to frighten and distress the victim.
Intimacy seekers seek to establish an intimate, loving relationship with their victim. To many of them the victim is a long-sought-after soul mate, and they were 'meant' to be together.
Incompetent suitors, despite poor social or courting skills, have a fixation, or in some cases, a sense of entitlement to an intimate relationship with those who have attracted their amorous interest. Their victims are most often already in a dating relationship with someone else.
Predatory stalkers spy on the victim in order to prepare and plan an attack – often sexual – on the victim.
Re: Lo's Inquisition
Hmmm...Rejected stalkers pursue their victims in order to reverse, correct, or avenge a rejection (e.g. divorce, separation, termination).
Resentful stalkers pursue a vendetta because of a sense of grievance against the victims – motivated mainly by the desire to frighten and distress the victim.
Re: Lo's Inquisition
What is Stalking?loCAtek wrote:Older: or showing backbone and being abused harder, because you were standing up to him. When he couldn't get your servitude, he took your money.
No, monitering is ample enough;Joe Guy wrote:.Doesn't stalking require someone to harass or intimidate another person?
Like domestic violence, stalking is a crime of power and control. Stalking is conservatively defined as:
"a course of conduct directed at a specific person that involves repeated (two or more occasions) visual or physical proximity, nonconsensual communication, or verbal, written, or implied threats, or a combination thereof, that would cause a reasonable person fear."
source
Based on the above definition I don't see where monitoring would be considered stalking unless it were combined with some of the above actions.
On the other hand, if you really do have PTSD, you may have paranoia. Then again, even if you don't have PTSD you may be paranoid.