Request to Quaddriver

[Timster]

Night time daytime I don't give a fuck, this shit needs to end now.
Come on Lo. End This.

[Sean]

Frankly, my privacy request was for you, mainly, in a last ditch show of respect; my latest discourse was embarrassing, while further revaluations will be damaging, to you & Gob. If you want that disclosed publicly, I thank you for your permission.

I call bullshit!

my latest discourse was embarrassing

Except for that bit.

[The Hen]

Lo, do you expect me to believe, that after ALL your venom towards me, coupled with your outright lies, you have now found a skerrick of writing (that you won't be able to link to) that you think proves your point about me willingly giving away my virginity at nine years of age and you are NOT posting it publicly?

Sorry. I don't believe you.

But do as you think fit Lo.

For the record, I am guessing you won't be posting it publicly.

[Andrew D]

Hey, Joe Guy:

What the fuck do I have to do with this thread?

Why did you drag me into this?

[Crackpot]

It was a joke

[Lord Jim]

Okay, well LoCa, it looks like all that remains to happen now is for that thread which only you and Hen and Daisy will be able to post in to be set up so you can begin the "mediation".

Apparently LoCa had some concern about making additional things public, but now that Hen has made clear she has no problem with LoCa bringing forward any thing she believes she has, it would appear that the last possible barrier to starting this has been removed.

If I might make a suggestion:

Daisy, when you get a chance, maybe you can just go ahead and set that up and then post your question about what both parties hope to achieve through this process, and then take it from there...

ETA:

I would make an additional suggestion:

LoCa, since you indicated you PM'd Daisy rather than posting publicly out of a concern for embarrassing Strop and Hen, and they have since indicated that they have no problem with whatever you have to say about them being made public, would you agree to Daisy being able to make the contents of the PM you sent public?

That would seem like a logical first step for this.

[Gob]

It was a joke

Andrew doesn't do jokes.

[Joe Guy]

Hey, Joe Guy:

What the fuck do I have to do with this thread?

Why did you drag me into this?

I didn't drag you into this. I dropped your name and you showed up on your own.

For the humor impaired, here's an explanation of my not all that funny joke;

This thread was started with the hope that quad would apologize to me for making a serious accusation and threatening me. It would have been a good thing for him if he had apologized.

So, I wrote that you & LoCA were probably helping him work on his apology.

Why you and LoCA?

Because, like quad, you and LoCA are not the most popular people on this BBS, but you both can write much better than quad the dumbshit. I could picture you and LoCA sitting somewhere coaching quad on how to put together an apology.

Somewhere in my twisted mind, I saw humor in that thought.

But I guess you didn't.

I apologize. I did not intend to drag you into an argument or to upset you.

[loCAtek]

~heh, well who's request to honor: I have a thread designed to respect privacy, and a permission to go public ... hmmmmm

[BoSoxGal]

Night time daytime I don't give a fuck, this shit needs to end now.
Come on Lo. End This.

x2

[Sean]

~heh, well who's request to honor: I have a thread designed to respect privacy, and a permission to go public ... hmmmmm

You do realise that the mediation thread is public viewing don't you?

[Crackpot]

lo Do you have any idea how disrespectful it is to request that someone donate their time to something and then just keep them waiting?

I know you're desperately trying to self-fulfuill that "prophesy" of editecs but you ever think the only one you're fooling is yourself?

[Lord Jim]

LoCa, I've been looking around and it looks like last night you posted in every thread where this imbroglio has been going on, except for the mediation thread, the one designed to resolve it, (where only you Hen and the mediator will be participating, which is the discussion you requested.)

I don't understand this. I can understand if you don't have time to spend on the board at all, (that happens to everybody) but I don't understand why, if you have time to spend here, (which apparently you do) you are choosing to spend it talking about this in every thread except the one for the discussion about it that you asked for.

I'd also repeat the earlier question I asked:

LoCa, since you indicated you PM'd Daisy rather than posting publicly out of a concern for embarrassing Strop and Hen, and they have since indicated that they have no problem with whatever you have to say about them being made public, would you agree to Daisy being able to make the contents of the PM you sent public?

Daisy has indicated that she knows what your issues are; I'm assuming she knows this because you outlined them in the PM you sent. (She said she's just waiting for you to post them) How about giving her the green light to post the contents of that PM in the mediation thread to get the exchange going?

In one post last night I believe you said something about not realizing there was a time limit on this. There isn't any hard and fast "time limit," but the more you demonstrate that you have time to spend on the board without participating in the mediation at all, the more it looks like all you want to do is drag this out as long as possible, rather than reach some sort of resolution, (which is what you have indicated you want to do; otherwise what point is there to the mediation?)

[Lord Jim]

LoCa, I understand that you had some issues that kept you away from the board, (as I said, this can happen to anybody.)

But a quick look at your most recent posting activity shows that last night you had time to make 19 posts over nearly a 3 hour period....

If you have that kind of time available to spend here, and don't spend any of it putting up even a single post in the thread devoted to the mediation that you requested, you're being inconsiderate of the person who volunteered to give their time to serve as mediator.

[Scooter]

Of course Hen. I said you couldn't face me mujer-a-mujer, and I was right.

Uh, remind me again who is too much of a chickenshit to face whom in the mediation she requested?

[Joe Guy]

What the hell?

The forum is all set up for mediation and LoCA is dancing around it and hinting that she has information about Hen that nobody else has.

Reminds me of a certain person who is not man enough to apologize to me for lying about me and making serious false accusations.

Do we now have a LoCAdriver on board?

[Scooter]

Which is why I saiid:

And the threat to reveal allegedly inside info is a dead giveaway on who is pulling your strings (as were the outrageous sexual accusations in the first place).

[Joe Guy]

Which is why I saiid:

And the threat to reveal allegedly inside info is a dead giveaway on who is pulling your strings (as were the outrageous sexual accusations in the first place).

Could be. But it makes no sense that quad would stay in the background and coach LoCA to be stupid.

On second thought, that might make sense in a senseless kind of way.

[Andrew D]

Okay, Joe Guy.

I guess that I was just peeved, because, as you say, I am not the most popular person around here. (Although my popularity appears to ebb and flow according to currents which I do not understand. Perhaps I should do another series of explanatory postings on US constitutional law; they seem to go down well.) And there have been threads advocating banning loCAtek and threads advocating banning quaddriver. And I have been referred to as "Andrewdriver".

The upshot being that I have been lumped in with those two posters as if I were constantly on "their side". In fact, however, I have had many public disagreements with each of them.

I do many things here which do not put me on many people's preferred guest lists. But choosing sides based on personalities is not among them. (Sure, I get pissed off at people, but that is not the same thing.) That just does not interest me. Thus, despite my and Lord Jim's animadversities, I recently posted:

He is, on the whole, correct.

I said so then:

Lord Jim's observations on the "follow the Constitution" subject are, on the whole, correct.

I say so again now.

He is, on the whole, correct.

I posted that because, that observation is, in my estimation, on the whole, correct. I really do not care whether that observation came from Lord Jim or from bigskygal or from Sue U or from Guinevere ....

What matters, as far as I am concerned, is that the observation is, in my estimation, on the whole, correct.

So I will keep responding to Gob's assertions about the allegedly resurrected nature of Cornish -- even if those assertions are contained in "quips" -- not because they are Gob's, but because I think them wrong. And when Gob takes a position which I think correct, I willl say so. (If I say anything at all; I feel no obligation to respond to everything posted by anyone.) And in neither case will my response be driven by the fact that it is Gob who is making the assertion.

Etc.

In short (by my standards of brevity, which are not universally agreed), I very much object to being lumped with other posters as if their identities somehow dictated my opinions and assertions. (Such lumping (though not of me) became a kind of ritual at CSB: editec, Gwenhwyvar, and Steve were routinely lumped together, and their many disagreements with each other were conveniently ignored.)

But that is evidently not what you had in mind to do, so I no longer have any objection to the posting about which I challenged you.

Cheers.

[The Hen]

The forum is all set up for mediation and LoCA is dancing around it and hinting that she has information about Hen that nobody else has.

Including Hen herself.