Page 1 of 1

Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the Sun

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 1:56 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
14 Dec 2013 00:00

Tracey Connelly, 32, who was jailed over her abused son’s death, told pals: “No one will touch me looking like this”.

Image

Baby P’s 22-stone mum is so desperate for a man she wants a gastric band op on the NHS costing £7,000. Since being released from jail six weeks ago, Connelly has spent a lot of her time gorging on sweets and chocolate mousse.

...The fast food junkie, who was jailed in 2009 over the shocking death of her tortured son Peter, told friends at the halfway house: “I need to do something about my weight”...

...Connelly was jailed indefinitely after she admitted causing or allowing the death of her little boy Peter. The mum had done nothing to stop him being tortured to death by her boyfriend Steven Barker and his paedophile brother Jason Owen. Peter was just 17 months old when he was found dead in his blood-spattered cot at his mother’s flat in Tottenham, North London, in 2007 after suffering 50 separate injuries, including a broken back. Connelly was released from Co Durham’s Low Newton jail at the end of October...

...Probation bosses ruled that though she is still deemed a risk to children, she is no longer a danger to the public. [Unless she breeds]...

...The gastric band is placed around the upper part of the stomach to create a smaller “pouch” meaning the patient feels full on less food. One woman cost the NHS £15,000 by having a band fitted, then removed. Now 20 stone, Diane Wiggett, 48, of Newcastle, has put back almost all the 10 stone she lost. She said: “I was meant to be this size.”
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ba ... ly-2924580

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:05 pm
by Jarlaxle
Wouldnt a lobotomy be cheaper?

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:35 pm
by rubato
While they've got her on the lift with the hood open they can tie off a couple of other things as well. Be worthwhile in the long run, economically speaking.

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 5:47 pm
by Joe Guy
That cigarette she's smoking looks like the thin self rolled variety.

They ought to put the gastric band around her neck.

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 7:08 pm
by rubato
The problem with random genetic reassortment, i.e. rolling the genetic dice, is that some people crap out.

I just feel sorry for her.


yrs,
rubato

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 8:04 pm
by Econoline
rubato wrote:While they've got her on the lift with the hood open they can tie off a couple of other things as well. Be worthwhile in the long run, economically speaking.
:ok

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 8:15 pm
by Joe Guy
Econoline wrote:
rubato wrote:While they've got her on the lift with the hood open they can tie off a couple of other things as well. Be worthwhile in the long run, economically speaking.
:ok
It's also worthwhile Econolinically speaking.

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 3:01 pm
by oldr_n_wsr
I can only shake my head. Where do these people come from? Torturing a 17month old to death. And she allowed this to happen?
I weep.

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:03 pm
by Crackpot
The sad thing is that sort of stuff goes on far too much. I myself know of 2 girls who were raped not that is girls not women one with the knowledge of her mother (by the mothers BF) You really have to wonder what is wrong with these people.

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:29 pm
by Econoline
I just had a brilliant idea for how fat British sows like this one could lose a lot of weight quickly, easily, and economically. Simply USE BIGGER STONES!!!!!

For example, if someone went out into the countryside with a wheelbarrow or maybe a small pickup truck and found Ms. Moby Cunt here a bunch of 44-pound stones to weigh herself with, she'd instantly be down to a svelte 7 stone. MUCH less than £7,000...problem solved!

Genius, huh? I wonder why nobody ever thought of this before? :loon

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:27 am
by Lord Jim
I find myself in agreement with rube and Econo...

(Well, not Econo's last post...I don't really even understand that one.... :? )

I find the fact that this woman was released after just four years, given the heinous (as a parent, incomprehensible) nature of the crimes she was found to be an accessory to, mind boggling enough...

It seems to me that given the nature of the crimes, requiring her to agree to having her tubes tied as a condition of parole would be more than reasonable...

Otherwise, keep her in prison at least till menopause...

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:37 am
by Gob
This is the UK, Mr Common Sense and Ms Justice have yet to be introduced to each other.

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 7:50 am
by Econoline
Lord Jim wrote:(Well, not Econo's last post...I don't really even understand that one.... :? )
Simple. She weighs 22 stone and wants to weigh 7 stone? Don't use those stupid ol' 14# stones; use some bigass 44# stones instead. Duh.

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:41 pm
by rubato
I thought it was pretty obvious.


Sheesh


yrs,
rubato

Re: Phew what a scorcher! Our very own page 3 gal rivals the

Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 4:27 pm
by Joe Guy
Econoline wrote:
Lord Jim wrote:(Well, not Econo's last post...I don't really even understand that one.... :? )
Simple. She weighs 22 stone and wants to weigh 7 stone? Don't use those stupid ol' 14# stones; use some bigass 44# stones instead. Duh.
Silly person. It is highly likely that Jim was concentrating on the multilegged creature crawling on your shoulder.

Image