Page 1 of 1

Welfraud

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:36 pm
by oldr_n_wsr
Busted! Octomom Charged With Welfare Fraud

Nadya Suleman has yet again found herself in trouble, and this time, the charges are more serious than ever.

The tabloid-friendly breeder better known as Octomom was charged Monday with welfare fraud by the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office. The charges came as a result of an investigation by the Department of Public Social Services that claims she allegedly failed to report nearly $30,000 in earnings between January and June of 2013.


The complaint, which uses Suleman's given name of Natalie Denise Suleman, says the 38-year-old filed for public assistance in Lancaster, California, in January 2013, but didn't disclose that she was also getting checks for personal appearances and residuals from videos.

Suleman allegedly earned more than $200,000 in 2012 largely from an adult video she made; she can only legally collect welfare if she earns less than $119,000 a year.

If convicted, Suleman would face up to five years and eight months in custody. She's scheduled to surrender and be arraigned on Friday at the Foltz Criminal Justice Center in downtown L.A. She was charged Jan. 6 with one count of aid by misrepresentation and two counts of perjury by false application for aid. Deputy District Attorney William Clark, who's prosecuting the case, will ask that bail be set at $25,000.

It's unclear what would happen to the custody of Octomom's 14 children should she be incarcerated. The D.A.'s office would not discuss that hypothetical situation.

Suleman became a tabloid fixture when she gave birth to octuplets in January 2009. She already had six other children, all of whom were conceived via in vitro fertilization.
How is it that anyone earning $119,000 a year can collect welfare?!?!?!!?
And at some point shouldn't the in-vitro people just say NO to her?
14 kids? 8 in one shot?

ETA
ooops, Here's the link
http://celebrity.yahoo.com/blogs/celeb- ... 52782.html

Re: Welfraud

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:20 pm
by rubato
The doctor's license was revoked:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/06/01/califo ... r.revoked/

yrs,
rubato

Re: Welfraud

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:43 pm
by Jarlaxle
She is a poster girl for sterilization of welfare recipients!

Re: Welfraud

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 5:52 pm
by TPFKA@W
200k in Cali probably doesn't go very far supporting 15 people.

All I can say is I feel bad for those kids. They got the shaft in the parent lottery.

Re: Welfraud

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:50 pm
by oldr_n_wsr
TPFKA@W wrote:200k in Cali probably doesn't go very far supporting 15 people.
I think it would go far enough to be ineligable for welfare.
All I can say is I feel bad for those kids. They got the shaft in the parent lottery.
Amen to that.

Re: Welfraud

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:36 pm
by rubato
TPFKA@W wrote:200k in Cali probably doesn't go very far supporting 15 people.

All I can say is I feel bad for those kids. They got the shaft in the parent lottery.

Twice over. She is their genetic mother as well as the mother who is raising them.

yrs,
rubato

Re: Welfraud

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 6:27 pm
by Joe Guy
oldr_n_wsr wrote:
TPFKA@W wrote:200k in Cali probably doesn't go very far supporting 15 people.
I think it would go far enough to be ineligable for welfare.
First of all, saying Octoslut would be eligible for "welfare" is too general of a term. Welfare includes Food Stamps, Cash Aid, Medi-Cal, SSI benefits and many other local assistance programs. A family can be eligible for Food Stamps and not for cash aid, or eligible for SSI and not food stamps etc.

That $119K per year figure is something that someone made up. She would very likely be eligible for Food Stamps if her income were $60,000/yr though.