Page 1 of 1

Defendants from Hell

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:14 pm
by BoSoxGal
Man with implanted horns sentenced for killings; 'I'll see you in hell,' he told jury
Associated Press

POSTED: 09/29/2014 05:14:02 PM PDT6 COMMENTS| UPDATED: A DAY AGO
Image

Defendant Caius Veiovis during a recess in his triple murder trial at Hampden County Superior Court, Sept., 9, 2014, in Springfield, Mass. (Gillian Jones, Berkshire Eagle)

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (AP) -- A Massachusetts man who has bumps resembling horns implanted in his forehead maintained his innocence before a judge sentenced him Monday to three consecutive life terms in the killings of three men who were kidnapped, shot and dismembered in 2011.

"Let me make this clear, my hand wasn't in this," Caius Veiovis, 34, of Pittsfield, said in a statement he read at his sentencing hearing in Hampden Superior Court.

Veiovis was convicted Friday in the killings of David Glasser, 44; Edward Frampton, 58, and Robert Chadwell, 47, all from Pittsfield. "I'll see you in hell," he told then the jury, which considered his case over six days.

Veiovis was the third co-defendant convicted of first-degree murder. All have been sentenced to the mandatory life in prison without parole.

Prosecutors said Veiovis helped Adam Lee Hall, 37, of Peru, and David Chalue, 47, of North Adams, kidnap and shoot the victims weeks before Glasser was to testify against Hall, a Hells Angels member, in an assault case. The others were killed to eliminate witnesses to Glasser's killing, prosecutors said.

Berkshire District Attorney David Capeless read victim impact statements Monday, including one from Chadwell's daughter Ashleye Hall, who said she and her children were close to her father, and Veiovis has deprived them of their future with him.

Veiovis said in his statement that authorities didn't believe he killed the men and offered him a plea bargain he rejected.

The Springfield Republican reports that Capeless said outside court that he and other investigators never said they thought Veiovis didn't kill the men and plea negotiations were conducted with all the defendants.

Defense lawyer James Reardon Jr. said that he regrets Veiovis' Friday outburst and that his client is not the kind of person portrayed in the media. Reardon said he hopes the verdict will be overturned. He said the evidence was insufficient.

Veiovis has a 666 tattoo between two rows of forehead bumps. A former resident of Augusta, Maine, he legally changed his name from Roy Gutfinski Jr. in 2008 while serving more than seven years in a Maine prison for assault.
Here's a bit of insight into the man:
Accused murderer explains his name in letter
By Andrew Amelinckx, Berkshire Eagle Staff
POSTED: 10/25/2011 12:05:29 AM EDT35 COMMENTS| UPDATED: 3 YEARS AGO

PITTSFIELD -- Accused murderer Caius Veiovis has sent a letter to The Eagle from jail in which he chastises the media for reporting that he took his name from the "Twilight" movie series. And in a terse postscript, Veiovis expressed sorrow to the families of the victims in a triple murder case he has been charged in.

"I would like to express my sincere condolences to the families involved in this tragic case. The deceased are not the only victims here," Veiovis stated in the postscript.

The letter, dated Oct. 16, was received Monday at The Eagle.

It is not clear what Veiovis meant by "not the only victims here."

A call to his attorney, James Gavin Reardon Jr. of Worcester, was not immediately returned.

Veiovis, 31, of Pittsfield, and two other men are facing three counts each of murder, kidnapping and witness intimidation in the August deaths of three Pittsfield men.

Veiovis, who has horn implants, facial tattoos, sharpened teeth and a split tongue, among other body modifications, legally changed his name from Roy C. Gutfinski Jr. to Caius Domitius Veiovis in 2008.

The main thrust of Veiovis' letter focuses on what has been written in the media about the origin of his name. The letter is penned in a highly stylized hand, and he signed his name with an upside-down cross and "666" beneath that. His forehead is tattooed with "666," which the Bible says is "the number of the beast."

Currently being housed in the Berkshire County Jail & House of Correction without bail, Veiovis states in his letter that he has been "cut off from access to the media," but believed there were reports alleging his first name came from "Twilight," the popular series of vampire-themed books and movies.

While The Eagle never linked his name to the "Twilight" series, several other media outlets have.

"Pop culture inspires me to vomit hot blood," Veiovis wrote, adding that he wouldn't waste his time "even now" reading the series of books.


Veiovis explained that his first and middle names -- Caius Domitius -- were inspired by "the great Roman emperors Caligula and Nero," and his last name is from "an ancient Etruscan daemon."

Veiovis has a long relationship with the judicial system -- he was first arrested at age 13 for carrying a knife -- and with the occult. He has told authorities he is a vampire and worships the devil.

Earlier in life, Veiovis allegedly revealed to staff at a juvenile detention facility that a nun had called him "psycho" and "evil" and told him that he would grow up to be a murderer, according to court documents.

He later served 7 1/2 years of a 10-year prison sentence in Maine on elevated assault charges for a ritual blood-letting ceremony involving a 16-year-old girl.

Veiovis, Adam Lee Hall, 34, of Peru, and David Chalue, 44, of North Adams, are accused of the kidnapping and murder of David Glasser, Edward Frampton and Robert Chadwell.

Authorities said the victims were taken Aug. 28 from the Linden Street home that Glasser and Frampton shared, and they later were killed and buried in a trench on private property in Becket.

The crimes allegedly were committed to keep Glasser from testifying against Hall, a member of the local chapter of the Hells Angels, in a kidnapping and assault case set for trial in September.

Police said Frampton and Chadwell were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

A fourth defendant, David Casey, of Canaan, N.Y., has been charged as an accessory to the crimes for allegedly helping to bury the bodies by using an excavator.

All four men have pleaded not guilty to the charges.
He can't be all bad; he reviles the Twilight series, after all!

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:29 pm
by Lord Jim
Veiovis has a long relationship with the judicial system
Wow, now there's a shock... :D
He can't be all bad; he reviles the Twilight series, after all!
I'll agree that's a point in his favor, but if your role models are Nero and Caligula, you're probably headed down the wrong path...
Veiovis, who has horn implants, facial tattoos, sharpened teeth and a split tongue, among other body modifications
Gee this guy is really a defense attorney's dream client, isn't he? He must have cut a very sympathetic figure with the jury... 8-)

I guess in this case about the best a defense lawyer can do is say to himself, "Well we're lucky we're in a state that doesn't have a death penalty, because otherwise there's no way I could save this clown from getting it."

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:39 pm
by Joe Guy
I bet there is nothing worse than an attorney having a bonehead for a client.

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:49 pm
by BoSoxGal
On appearances only, he's one thug I might hesitate to hug . . . however, his line about Twilight was very clever, and I'm guessing that in person, he's often quite personable.

Not so much when yelling at the jury, mind you. ;)

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:50 pm
by wesw
his face is runed...er, ruined

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:32 pm
by Lord Jim
I'm guessing that in person, he's often quite personable.
So was Ted Bundy... 8-)

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 1:51 pm
by rubato
If a licensed MD did those implants he/she should be charged with malpractice.


yrs,
rubato

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:19 pm
by Big RR
I don't think so; IMHO they're just like the majority of breast implants--unnecessary body mutilation and something that makes the recipient appear unnatural, with giant breasts that neither look or move like real ones. But if it's not malpractice to give someone those implants, I can't see how giving someone these horn implants would be.

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:23 pm
by wesw
I think prison will fix him.

'cause they re gonna f^%$# the hell out of him

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:29 pm
by BoSoxGal
Veiovis has a long relationship with the judicial system -- he was first arrested at age 13 for carrying a knife -- and with the occult. He has told authorities he is a vampire and worships the devil.

Earlier in life, Veiovis allegedly revealed to staff at a juvenile detention facility that a nun had called him "psycho" and "evil" and told him that he would grow up to be a murderer, according to court documents.

He later served 7 1/2 years of a 10-year prison sentence in Maine on elevated assault charges for a ritual blood-letting ceremony involving a 16-year-old girl.
One has to wonder whether he was born bad, or made bad by his very lengthy relationship with incarceration - or the Catholic Church. ;)

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:31 pm
by wesw
sounds like the nun knew of what she spoke....

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 4:12 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
Quid nun facere cogitas?

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:17 am
by BoSoxGal
Joe Guy wrote:I bet there is nothing worse than an attorney having a bonehead for a client.

Quite the contrary, IMHO.

The worst thing for an attorney is a biased Judge, one you know is not giving your client a fair shake, but not so clearly evident that the Judicial Standards Commission would take action and not the kind of bias that gives any basis for appeal.

The second worst thing for an attorney is opposing counsel that is either a complete asshole who loves to argue for argument's sake, or one who drives up billing by making every aspect of litigation as drawn-out and adversarial as possible.

I can only speak from the perspective of having practiced in family law, criminal law and consumer protection on behalf of low-income clients . . . but I've also talked a great deal over the years with bosses and colleagues who have represented clients with money.

I think boneheaded clients are fairly common, but a good attorney with good people skills can usually mitigate that concern by managing the client well . . . the best lawyers have not only the skills required to research and argue the law well, but also the most critical skill of all, the ability to manage difficult personalities when required.

With regard to the OP; I found this article detailing the attorney's concerns about Mr. Evil's appearance and the effect it might have on jurors, and how he raised those concerns with the Court: http://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/ci_2 ... ttoos-will

Here is a recent case (which may have been posted here?) wherein the Court ordered, at State expense, the covering of a defendant's tattoos each day prior to trial: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/06/us/06 ... d=all&_r=0

Mr. Evil's attorney apparently didn't try to argue this, or perhaps his client wasn't willing to hide his body art. It would have been very difficult to do anything about those bumps, in any case.

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 12:22 am
by Lord Jim
Well, I suppose it's one thing to have to defend your average, garden variety bonehead...

And another when you have to defend The Great Horned One... :D

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 1:01 pm
by rubato
The MD who did the surgery should lose his licence because the kid needed a psych referral.


yrs,
rubato

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 1:42 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
Here is a recent case (which may have been posted here?) wherein the Court ordered, at State expense, the covering of a defendant's tattoos
Tattoos? Guilty, without a doubt. Those responsible for the cover-up should be jailed!!!

Re: Defendants from Hell

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:59 pm
by Gob
rubato wrote:The MD who did the surgery should lose his licence because the kid needed a psych referral.


yrs,
rubato


They are done at tattoo parlours.