Commercial

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Commercial

Post by Big RR »

I heard about this on the radio this morning; apparently the ad provoked a public outcry that convinced Go Daddy to pull it. Personally, I think it's pretty good; worth a watch (note, there are several repetitions/versions of it on the link).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH5wdm1Caoo

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Commercial

Post by Lord Jim »

I heard about this on the news earlier...

I think it's godawful, and I fully understand why they pulled it....

The "lighter side" of puppy abuse isn't exactly a marketing winner...

It's amazing to me that it could have gotten approval in the first place...
ImageImageImage

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: Commercial

Post by wesw »

well, I don t think it is an effective commercial as it is in poor taste and likely to turn more people off than on.

similar to the rob lowe anti cable commercial where he makes fun of people less handsome than he and I. :)

I also have a special dislike of puppymills

I don t however see any abuse or a puppymill, just a distasteful commercial.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Commercial

Post by Lord Jim »

similar to the rob lowe anti cable commercial where he makes fun of people less handsome than he and I.
I actually like some of those...

I think my favorite is the one with "super creepy Rob Lowe"...
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Commercial

Post by Big RR »

I didn't see any abuse either (although shipping and transporting the puppies without a crate could be abuse). But I liked the punchline--after the dog got back he was sold, which is what breeders do; everyone was expecting a sentimental homecoming (like one of the sappy Clydesdale commercials) and here was a bon voyage. Not sure it was a good commercial to attract people to Go Daddy, and I'm certain some might find it offensive, but at least it wasn't a sappy tug at the emotions (and it wasn't Danica Patrick in a bikini either).

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21506
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Commercial

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

It wasn't? Oh well, no point looking then.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15480
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Commercial

Post by Joe Guy »

I believe that it is possible that the GoDaddy advertisers may have never intended that one to be shown during the Superbowl and figured the controversy it would cause would give it more exposure for a much cheaper price.

Also....

The commercial might offend some people but it serves a purpose.

yrs,

wesw... :D

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: Commercial

Post by wesw »

well then, I ll post a graph that shows I am right and that puppies would be better used as food for babies thus doing away with breast feeding and a chart that shows that the horrid little children deserve no better

then you can admit you are wrong and that I predicted you would be wrong. I m glad you admitted as much and were able to learn something

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Commercial

Post by Big RR »

Joe Guy--you might be right on the intent of Go Daddy, but they're a strange company so who knows what the powers that be were thinking. Personally, I thought it was funny, but then I tend to gag at the emotional ploy commercials (what does a dog running with the Clydesdales have to do with a "beer" (if that's what you want to call it)?). and the ones that try to be cute--like the baby trading online-- are just as bad.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15480
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Commercial

Post by Joe Guy »

Image

Only after I realized I had a hungry baby and no food in the house....

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Commercial

Post by Lord Jim »

Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Commercial

Post by Lord Jim »

you might be right on the intent of Go Daddy, but they're a strange company so who knows what the powers that be were thinking.
I think it would be a strange company that didn't...

Especially when you're talking about a major company and a Super Bowl ad...a lot of money on the line...

I'm sure they focus grouped this one up the ying-yang...

If I were a cynical person, (which of course as everyone here knows, I most certainly am not) I might think they knew exactly what the public reaction would likely be, and released it early knowing full well that they would pull it, just to gain millions of dollars worth of free pre-Super Bowl publicity...

But fortunately I'm not a cynical person, so I don't for a moment think that...
ImageImageImage

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Commercial

Post by rubato »

wesw wrote:well then, I ll post a graph that shows I am right and that puppies would be better used as food for babies thus doing away with breast feeding and a chart that shows that the horrid little children deserve no better

then you can admit you are wrong and that I predicted you would be wrong. I m glad you admitted as much and were able to learn something

You will have to clean, skin, and bone the puppies first, of course. Home meat grinders can't handle the bones:

Image


I've heard there is a good market for hides:

Image




yrs,
rubato

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Commercial

Post by TPFKA@W »

I thought the commercial was awful and actually Tweeted them and asked if Cruella de Vil was their CEO. Promoting puppy mills is just not Kosher.

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Commercial

Post by rubato »

TPFKA@W wrote:I thought the commercial was awful and actually Tweeted them and asked if Cruella de Vil was their CEO. Promoting puppy mills is just not Kosher.
You can sell it to Gentiles! IIR There is a Kibbutz which produces pork for the local market.

yrs,
rubato

wesw
Posts: 9646
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 1:24 am
Location: the eastern shore

Re: Commercial

Post by wesw »

I did not see a puppy mill, tho I see how it could be seen as implied.

puppy mills are horrible and cruel, with no room to move , let alone run. they keep animals in their own feces, and breed the bitches to death, often with their own offspring. they looked like reputable breeders, puppies have to come from somewhere....

a nice farm, which supplements their income by producing quality, healthy dogs is not a puppy mill

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20179
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Commercial

Post by BoSoxGal »

That's not promoting puppy mills by any stretch of the imagination. The one negative aspect of the ad is transporting the puppies in the open bed of a pickup truck.

I wonder where people think purebred dogs of high quality are bred? Most reputable breeders I've ever seen are breeding on a small family farm like the one in the ad - and most reputable breeders have websites, too.

Puppy mills mass breed dogs for pet stores primarily, and almost never sell direct to the consumer.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11667
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: Commercial

Post by Crackpot »

Jim also doesn't have a sarcastic bone in his body.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9136
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Commercial

Post by Sue U »

I frankly didn't see anything to get outraged about in the commercial. I love dogs, I've got a dog, and my reaction was "Meh." It's just not a particularly good (or bad) ad.
GAH!

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Commercial

Post by TPFKA@W »

bigskygal wrote:That's not promoting puppy mills by any stretch of the imagination. The one negative aspect of the ad is transporting the puppies in the open bed of a pickup truck.

I wonder where people think purebred dogs of high quality are bred? Most reputable breeders I've ever seen are breeding on a small family farm like the one in the ad - and most reputable breeders have websites, too.

Puppy mills mass breed dogs for pet stores primarily, and almost never sell direct to the consumer.
The SPCA disagrees with you, as do I. Not that anyone else's opinion would matter.

http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising- ... mor-162590

Post Reply