Plan B Forum

Was shooting a rare gorilla the only option for Cincinnati Zoo?

(CNN)Zookeepers shot and killed a rare gorilla after a 3-year-old boy slipped into its enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo, triggering an outcry over how the situation was handled.

Footage shot by a witness shows Harambe, the 17-year-old male gorilla, standing near the boy, who went under a rail, through wires and over a moat wall to get into the enclosure, according to the zoo. The footage later shows Harambe dragging the child through the water as the clamor of the crowd grows louder and increasingly panicked.

Zookeepers then shot the 450-pound western lowland gorilla with a rifle, rather than tranquilizing him.

"Tranquilizers do not take effect for several minutes, and the child was in imminent danger. On top of that, the impact from the dart could agitate the animal and cause the situation to get much worse," Thane Maynard, director of the Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, said in a statement released Sunday.

"We are heartbroken about losing Harambe, but a child's life was in danger and a quick decision had to be made."

The boy, who has not been identified, was taken to Children's Hospital and released later Saturday evening. The family is not granting interviews at this time, but released the following statement through a public relations firm:

"We are so thankful to the Lord that our child is safe. He is home and doing just fine. We extend our heartfelt thanks for the quick action by the Cincinnati Zoo staff. We know that this was a very difficult decision for them, and that they are grieving the loss of their gorilla. We hope that you will respect our privacy at this time."

However, the boy's brief encounter with the gorilla set off an uproar on the Internet. The zookeeper's decision to shoot Harambe has been called into question over whether death was the only option.


A vigil was held for Harambe outside the zoo Monday, and nine people showed up.

Questions over lethal shot

Western lowland gorillas are critically endangered in the wild, numbering fewer than 175,000, according to the zoo. An additional 765 gorillas dwell in zoos worldwide.

The family had been visiting the zoo on Saturday when the boy slipped away and entered the enclosure. Some are blaming the boy's mother for failing to look after her son.

Kimberley Ann Perkins O'Connor, who captured part of the incident on her phone, told CNN she overheard the boy joking to his mother about going into the water.

Others have even suggested the boy's parents should be held criminally responsible for the incident. An online petition seeking "Justice for Harambe" has earned more than 100,000 signatures. The petition states: "This beautiful gorilla lost his life because the boy's parents did not keep a closer watch on the child."

In response to questions on whether charges might be brought against the boy's parents, Lieutenant Stephen Saunders, the public information officer for Cincinnati Police says he is "not aware of any intention to charge the mother" or "the parents" at this time.

Saunders says county prosecutors will be involved in making a decision about possible charges.
Others said the zoo was too quick to take the decision to shoot Harambe. Ian Redmond, chairman of The Gorilla Organization, said zookeepers had other options besides a fatal shot.[I wonder if he would have felt that way if it had been his kid...]
"When gorilla or other apes have things they shouldn't have, keepers will negotiate with them, bring food, their favorite treats, pineapple or some kind of fruit that they don't know and negotiate with them," he told CNN.

"I don't know if that was tried or people thought there was too much danger but it does seem very unfortunate that a lethal shot was required," he said.

Animal expert Jeff Corwin told CNN that tranquilizers may have taken too long.

"It can take, in some situations, depending on what the medication is, it can take upward to 10 to 15 minutes. It may take multiple shots."

Many reiterated that a human life was at stake -- especially that of a child -- and that's more important than that of a gorilla.

Cellphone video filmed by a zoo-going member of the public, O'Connor, showed the terrifying events unfold as the child's mother could be heard saying, "Mommy's right here."

At first, it looked like Harambe was trying to help the boy, O'Connor told CNN. The gorilla stood him up and pulled up his pants.

However, as the crowd's clamors grew, Harambe tossed the boy into a corner of the moat before standing over him, O'Connor said.

The crowd's cries appeared to agitate Harambe anew, O'Connor said, and the video shows him grabbing the boy by the foot. He dragged him through the water and out of the moat atop the habitat, O'Connor said.

Moments later, Harambe was shot and put down.

Although it was the first incident of its kind at Cincinnati Zoo's Gorilla World exhibit since it opened in 1978, similar dramatic cases have occurred -- but with very different outcomes.

In 1986, a five-year-old boy named Levan Merritt tumbled into the gorilla enclosure at Jersey Zoo in the UK. Video filmed by a bystander showed Levan lying on the ground, bleeding from the head and unconscious.
In the footage Jambo, a male gorilla, is seen approaching the boy and appears to check on him, extending a hand to stroke his back. When Merritt comes to, wailing, Jambo, seemingly startled by the cries, sets off in a different direction. Zookeepers immediately move in to save the boy.

A decade later, a three-year-old boy fell nearly 20 feet into the gorilla enclosure at the Brookfield Zoo in Chicago.
This time, a female gorilla named Binti Jua picked up the unconscious boy, while carrying her own infant on her back, and guarded him from other gorillas. In an incredible show of maternal care, Binti took him right to a door so that zookeepers could retrieve him.

RayThom wrote: if found negligent, the parents should be held responsible for the necessary killing of Harambe.

it's still beyond sad that a beautiful endangered creature going into the prime of its breeding life was destroyed due to the stupidity and negligence of cockroach humans.

MajGenl.Meade wrote:Of course, venal humans will probably kill them out in the wild unless they are protected - look at rhinos for example.

If you can't manage all your brood of kids in a public place that inherently poses dangers, you need to bring another adult

Lord Jim (to BSG) wrote:I may be interpreting this wrong (I certainly hope that I am) but the whole tone of your post suggests to me that if it were not for concern about "liability" you may believe that the appropriate course of action here would have been to use a tranquilizer dart and risk the life of the "cockroach human" child in order to save "beautiful endangered creature". In other words, that it would have been morally acceptable to risk the life of the child in order to save the life of the gorilla.

"I brought you into this world and I'll take you out.  And it don't make no difference to me 'cause I'll make another one looks just like you."

Humans are cruel. I don't want to be one anymore...

it was a group of small children

I have watched this video over again, and with the silverback's posturing, and tight lips, it's pretty much the stuff of any keeper's nightmares, and I have had MANY while working with them. This job is not for the complacent. Gorillas are kind, curious, and sometimes silly, but they are also very large, very strong animals. I always brought my OCD to work with me. checking and rechecking locks to make sure the animals under my care and I remained separated before entering to clean.

I keep hearing that the Gorilla was trying to protect the boy. I do not find this to be true. Harambe reaches for the boys hands and arms, but only to position the child better for his own displaying purposes.

Males do very elaborate displays when highly agitated, slamming and dragging things about. Typically they would drag large branches, barrels and heavy weighted balls around to make as much noise as possible. Not in an effort to hurt anyone or anything (usually) but just to intimidate. It was clear to me that he was reacting to the screams coming from the gathering crowd.

Harambe was most likely not going to separate himself from that child without seriously hurting him first (again due to mere size and strength, not malicious intent) Why didn't they use treats? well, they attempted to call them off exhibit (which animals hate), the females in the group came in, but Harambe did not. What better treat for a captive animal than a real live kid!

They didn't use Tranquilizers for a few reasons, A. Harambe would've taken too long to become immobilized, and could have really injured the child in the process as the drugs used may not work quickly enough depending on the stress of the situation and the dose B. Harambe would've have drowned in the moat if immobilized in the water, and possibly fallen on the boy trapping him and drowning him as well.