My best guess is that it is saying a person can use his/her birth certificate with a supporting affidavit attached to claim title to property. I get a headache when I try to think any deeper than that.GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE
Rule 220.Birth Certificates
The Registrar of Titles is authorized to receive for registration of memorials upon any outstanding certificate of title an official birth certificate pertaining to a registered owner named in said certificate of title showing the date of birth of said registered owner, providing there is attached to said birth certificate an affidavit of an affiant who states that he/she is familiar with the facts recited, stating that the party named in said birth certificate is the same party as one of the owners named in said certificate of title; and that thereafter the Registrar of Titles shall treat said registered owner as having attained the age of the majority at a date 18 years after the date of birth shown by said certificate.
What makes this poorly written "rule" so interesting is that it has been interpreted by conspiracy theorists to mean that when a child is born, parents are tricked into signing a birth certificate, which gives the government ownership of the child. The birth certificate is then used as a bond that is traded in the market and we, the people have the right to reclaim the value of that bond but the government is hiding that fact from us.
This is one of hundreds of videos on the subject...