First, labelling
a few sporadic attacks as "an insurgency" is beyond hyperbole.
Second, you never demonstrate your ignorance quite so clearly as when you spout such nonsense about your own country's history that even a foreigner can identify it as utter bullshit. No other territory has engaged in insurgency against the U.S.? Even just sticking to those areas which were legally territories at the time:
There was the Philippine-American War.
There was the "Confederate Territory of Arizona" carved out of the southern half of what was then New Mexico Territory by a secession convention, and whose troops waged war against the United States. It later became part of the states of Arizona and New Mexico
There were, in that same period, both pro-United States and pro-Confederacy factions in what was then Indian territory, and those who supported the Confederacy took up arms against the United States. Indian territory became part of the state of Oklahoma.
So remind us again how Puerto Rico, is so "different than [sic] other territories"?
I spoke only about areas that were legally designated territories, because the village idiot is too stupid to realize the depths of his own hypocrisy by continually carping about territories that take up arms against the United States, when his own state plus several more engaged in widespread treason against the United States.
I would ask the village idiot, who won't have the integrity or the courage to answer, who owes more loyalty to the United States? Is it the states who joined voluntarily, and then took up arms against the very institutions they vowed to "preserve, protect and defend"? Or is it territories that were annexed to the United States by force, and that in many cases were denied some or all of the privileges of citizens of the United States?
Reading the ravings of this product of multiple generations of Confederate inbreeders makes me wonder if it would have been better if a few million Confederates had been left hanging from trees in every corner of the South.
