Page 1 of 1

This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:04 pm
by Lord Jim
I hope it's not an omen... :?
Tree at Mount Vernon, linked to George Washington, felled in storm

Image

Hundreds of trees came crashing down amid the fury of last week’s windstorm, and with the elements seemingly heedless of whose trees they were, it seemed sad but unsurprising that one of them stood on the grounds of Mount Vernon and dated to the days of George Washington.

It may even have been transplanted into the earth on the grounds of the first President’s home in Fairfax County, Va., more than 200 years ago by Washington himself, according to Robert Shenk, an official at the estate .

An entry made into Washington’s diary on July 13, 1785 said the hemlock was near the garden gates on that day, Shenk said.

Whether Washington prepared the soil and placed the tree with his own hands is not known, said Shenk, who is Mount Vernon’s senior vice president for visitor engagement.

However, he added, “he certainly thought it worthy of one of his typically terse diary entries. “

Moreover, Shenk said, a man with Washington’s demonstrated interest in trees and plants “likely directed its planting” as well as its prominent siting along the estate’s North Serpentine.


Not native to Virginia, he said, the hemlock, which possibly arrived as a sapling or young tree, was “something to be prized.”

The exact age of the hemlock can not be fixed with certainty, as neither history nor the dating of venerable trees appears to be perfectly exact.

On the trunk of the tree, Shenk said, the date was listed as “circa 1791.” That dating, he said, was based “on the dendrochronology,” the science of dating environmental events based on study of growth rings in tree trunks.

The six-year discrepancy between the date on the trunk and the date of the diary entry?

“Likely the result of small errors in the science,” said Shenk. .

It is hard not to mourn the loss of a tree with roots so deep in history and with so close a connection to the man regarded as foremost among the country’s Founding Fathers.

But the power of nature is not easily denied. The winds in the Washington region on Friday gusted up to 60 mph and higher.

And ultimately its fate was no different from what befell many trees that were little known beyond the streets where they stood. Hundreds of trees, many of them capable of being described as essentially anonymous, fell around the area.

“The tree clearly had some rot deep within it ,” Shenk said, “so it’s not likely that it would have survived much longer. “

The tree at Mount Vernon was not the only casualty among members of the plant kingdom with ties to the early American republic.

A tree that toppled in the Dupont Circle area during the storm was believed to be 200 years old, and was said to have stood on a farm once owned by President Andrew Jackson.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/tr ... 584076c0ec

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:18 pm
by Joe Guy
That is Omen II

This was Omen I....

Image

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:59 am
by ex-khobar Andy
“Likely the result of small errors in the science,” said Shenk.
Dendrochronology is pretty exact. The only way this type of error could occur would be due to sampling: if the core taken for dating is from a branch, for example, which did not exist until the tree was already six years old. Any semi-competent dendrochronolgist would know that, and sample accordingly. So if it was 1791, and planted as a sapling, it was probably two or three years old at the time of planting which would be 1794 or so. GW of course was still alive and may well have planted it; but it is not the tree of the diary entry.

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:11 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
the elements seemingly heedless of whose trees they were
"Seemingly" eh? Those heartless elements!

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:23 pm
by Long Run
ex-khobar Andy wrote: GW of course was still alive and may well have planted it; but it is not the tree of the diary entry.
When legend becomes fact, print the legend.

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 4:06 pm
by Big RR
Exactly, and according to legend Washington acquired the tree from Greece, which documented that it was the same hemlock from which Socrates' execution potion was made; Plato's student's and their descendants lovingly cared for it for centuries until George's emissaries acquired it and brought it here through perilous sea voyages where the tree helped those around it acquire both uncommon intelligence and eloquence, permitting them to deliver the tree to its new owner. Later, a branch was used to create wooden teeth (not ivory as is commonly believed), and the hemlock teeth made him stronger and impervious to poison and weapons, befitting his station in life.

When the tree learned that Trump wanted to claim it, it killed itself, lest the power fall into his hands.

This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 4:35 pm
by RayThom
History goes to the best writers and, given time, the symbolism created becomes a factual narrative. We revere our national symbols. They tell such fascinating stories -- what's not to believe?

Unfortunately, "alternative facts" can sometimes become more reliable than someone else's truth. Like beauty, it's mostly in the eye of the beholder.

Case in point -- not one of Lincoln's cabins was ever a home during his boyhood years. However, those writers sure knew how to spin a great yarn, and tourists suck this stuff up.

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:34 pm
by MGMcAnick
With all the slaves that George Washington owned, does anyone think he would have dirtied his hands to plant a tree?

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:23 pm
by Big RR
Didn't he cut one down with his new hatchet?

Re: This Was Sad To See...

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:39 am
by MajGenl.Meade
Big RR, surely, even in Virginia, the founding fathers did not approve of disciplining slaves in that fashion? :o