Our leniency is absurd.
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
OK, but then why not use a real one? Any self respecting serious terrorist would be able to get or make one.
And FWIW, would most people even be able to recognize a suicide vest on sight so they would be filled with fear? From pictiures i have seen they just look like bulky vests; indeed, isn't that how people wearing them can get into busy places without detection.
And FWIW, would most people even be able to recognize a suicide vest on sight so they would be filled with fear? From pictiures i have seen they just look like bulky vests; indeed, isn't that how people wearing them can get into busy places without detection.
Our leniency is absurd.
Suicide Vest: Or a reasonably facsimile thereof.
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Ask him. Oh, wait.....Big RR wrote:OK, but then why not use a real one? Any self respecting serious terrorist would be able to get or make one.
The police thought it realistic enough to shoot him. Don't forget, these are Pommy cops, not American.Big RR wrote:And FWIW, would most people even be able to recognize a suicide vest on sight so they would be filled with fear? From pictiures i have seen they just look like bulky vests; indeed, isn't that how people wearing them can get into busy places without detection.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9015
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Let me see if I've got this straight. Crazy bloke stabs several people (two fatally), is subdued by bystanders and bobbies on scene, PCs see he is wearing a suicide vest (which turned out to be fake, but who knew at the time?), and shoot him dead.
I'm Robin Hood with that.
-"BB"-
I'm Robin Hood with that.
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Assuming they thought the vest was real; if he was, indeed, subdued, he posed no danger since he could not set the vest off. If he already set it off (maybe on a timer), shooting and killing him would make no difference. So why shoot him?
Now if he was not subdued, the shooting may well have been justified as they could believe it was a real vest that he could set off.
Now if he was not subdued, the shooting may well have been justified as they could believe it was a real vest that he could set off.
-
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
- Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
I'm by no means a fan of execution on site/sight; but in this case the cops saw a suicide vest and they had no means of seeing if it was real or fake, and as far as they knew he was not subdued enough to make 100% certain that he could not set it off. Even if his hands were tied he could perhaps set it off with some other action.
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Without more compelling info I'm not prepared to condemn the cops for shooting him. Nor am I prepared to accept this incident as a condemnation of the British penal/parole system, particularly as parolees were also involved in mitigating the threat posed by the attacker.
"If you don't have a seat at the table, you're on the menu."
-- Author unknown
-- Author unknown
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
It seems normal to me for police to shoot someone who has a knife and just killed two people but I wonder about shooting someone who is suspected of wearing a 'suicide vest'. If it were real, wouldn't it explode? Weren't there people nearby him? Including the cops?
-
- Posts: 5419
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
- Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Any system which does not execute all murderers and wannabe murderers will run the risk of making a mistake. It seems that the same justice system which (with hindsight, wrongly) released this man also set free another murderer who was sufficiently rehabilitated to show considerable courage in restraining and helping to subdue him. Human judgments, even if they are 99% right, will be 100% wrong to that victim of the rare error. It's something I used to point out to my customer service guys: we could have an enviable 99% on time record, but as far as that 1 in 100 customer was concerned, we were 100% late.
If you want to see an example of a really screwed up system, we now see here in the US George Zimmerman suing the Trayvon Martin family for $100 million. In my view, Zimmerman was fucking lucky to get away with murdering Martin. Somehow, and remember the jury have to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury entertained the idea that there was a tiny chance (5%??) that Zimmerman's explanation - he was minding his own business when Martin jumped him - was the real one. Of course because they believed that this explanation was minimally plausible, he was found not guilty. Maybe that was justice: the adversarial 'innocent until proven guilty' system is the best we have so really there's no maybe there - but the corollary became that Martin was now the aggressor and right wing radio was all over it. The narrative became that poor George (why can I hear Ann Richards' voice?) was set upon by the uncontrolled thug Martin for no reason (despite being 50 pounds outweighed) and was lucky to survive.
In a UK court, if he were to bring that lawsuit and if he were to lose, legal costs for the Marin family would be awarded against him.
If you want to see an example of a really screwed up system, we now see here in the US George Zimmerman suing the Trayvon Martin family for $100 million. In my view, Zimmerman was fucking lucky to get away with murdering Martin. Somehow, and remember the jury have to be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury entertained the idea that there was a tiny chance (5%??) that Zimmerman's explanation - he was minding his own business when Martin jumped him - was the real one. Of course because they believed that this explanation was minimally plausible, he was found not guilty. Maybe that was justice: the adversarial 'innocent until proven guilty' system is the best we have so really there's no maybe there - but the corollary became that Martin was now the aggressor and right wing radio was all over it. The narrative became that poor George (why can I hear Ann Richards' voice?) was set upon by the uncontrolled thug Martin for no reason (despite being 50 pounds outweighed) and was lucky to survive.
In a UK court, if he were to bring that lawsuit and if he were to lose, legal costs for the Marin family would be awarded against him.
- Econoline
- Posts: 9555
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Likewise, any system which DOES execute all murderers and wannabe murderers will run the risk of making a mistake.ex-khobar Andy wrote:Any system which does not execute all murderers and wannabe murderers will run the risk of making a mistake.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 20704
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Khan was shot dead by officers after members of the public restrained him.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Our leniency is absurd.
Don't post a photo, tell us how you really feel.