Page 1 of 3

Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 3:53 pm
by BoSoxGal
Investigation finds no racial bias by employee who cut biracial girl's hair, Michigan school district says

Image
Family photos provided to CNN affiliate WJRT show Jurnee Hoffmeyer before her hair was cut and afterward

(CNN) — There was no racial bias at play when a Michigan school staff member cut a biracial child's hair, the school district said on Friday, citing the result of a third-party investigation into the incident which occurred in March.

The Mount Pleasant Public School district (MPPS) released a statement saying that the investigation found that the employee violated school policy by cutting the girl's hair, but that there was no evidence that the incident was "motivated by racial bias." The district said that the investigation was done in addition to an internal review by the district administration. The statement didn't disclose who conducted the independent investigation.
Mount Pleasant is a city in central Michigan. The school district has an enrollment of more than 3,400 students of whom 72.4% are White, according to data from the Michigan Department of Education. Less than 2.5% are described as African American.
The investigation was launched after Jurnee Hoffmeyer, a 7-year-old biracial girl, had her hair cut by a librarian in late March, according to Christina Laster, the Director of Policy and Legislation for the National Parents Union and a representative and advocate for the family.

In an interview with CNN, Laster said that Hoffmeyer came home on March 24 with a chunk of her hair missing and told her dad that another girl at school cut it. They then had a hairstylist fix her hair by giving her an asymmetrical bob cut that left some of the hair's length.

But two days later, Hoffmeyer came home crying with her hair trimmed short, according to Laster. She said that her librarian had cut her hair while at school. Two other school employees were also aware of the incident but didn't report it, Laster said.

The family believes the unauthorized haircut was due to racial bias, Laster said. Hoffmeyer's dad reported the incident to the school district but transferred her out after the employee wasn't fired, she said.

The employee who cut the student's hair won't be fired, the district said in the statement Friday, but will "be placed on a 'last chance' agreement during which time any future violations will likely result in termination."

"We believe a last chance agreement is appropriate given that the employee has an outstanding record of conduct and has never once been reprimanded in more than 20 years of work at MPPS," the statement said.

The district also noted that the two other employees who didn't report the haircut were given written reprimands that will remain in their school file.

"It's clear from the third-party investigation and the district's own internal investigation that MPPS employees had good intentions when performing the haircut," the district said. "Regardless, their decisions and actions are unacceptable and show a major lack of judgement. The employees involved have acknowledged their wrong actions and apologized."

Laster said that the family felt twice victimized after hearing the results of the investigation.

"First the librarian cut her hair without permission, and she suffered traumatically," Laster told CNN. "She is now in counseling and therapy for a thing that happened to her and is still trying to grow her hair back."

"The school board only offered a small reprimand, so they feel victimized again," she said.

Laster said she found the investigation results disappointing and confusing, especially because none of the Hoffmeyer family was interviewed or asked for their perspective.

"They didn't get both sides of the story, so how do you get those key findings?" she said. "Overall it's a lack of accountability."

CNN has reached out to the school district for comment.

The family has decided to pursue a state investigation into the incident and has filed a complaint with Michigan's Department of Civil Rights. The department confirmed it is investigating a certified complaint from Hoffmeyer's father.

"We cannot discuss the particulars of a complaint while it remains under investigation," said Vicki Levengood, communications director for the department. "We can say, however, that our Community Engagement Director will be in contact with the school administration again this week to assess the situation and to assist with training and educational opportunities that we believe may help prevent an incident of this type from occurring in the future."

CNN has also reached out to the Michigan Department of Education and the Hoffmeyer's attorney for comment.

The family is also trying to push for more legislation that makes it illegal to discriminate based on hair, Laster said.

"No child should be receiving a haircut at school," she said. "This has been humiliating to her family, and this is a young girl who is developing and is going to have a lifelong impact. They are not seeing the harm. They are protecting adults, not children."
In what universe is it remotely okay to cut a child’s hair at school, without prior consultation of parents?

How is this not a criminal assault?

How does this librarian not get fired?

And yes, this kind of incident can deeply wound a child for a lifetime, depending on the circumstances and the level of humiliation involved. This one falls squarely into the basket of proof that some people go into childcare and school settings for the many opportunities it affords to hurt children. I don’t believe for a minute that this librarian hasn’t hurt plenty of other children over 20 years of access to them.

If this was my child that librarian would be in a world of pain.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 5:04 pm
by Scooter
This was not a "violat[ion of} school policy", this was assault on a child with a deadly weapon. She should be in prison.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 5:06 pm
by Bicycle Bill
I suppose they could have sent her home ... but to what?  This ain't the world of "Father Knows Best" or "Leave it to Beaver" any more, where there were always two parents and one of them was always at home.

So that left them with two choices ... try to 'even up' the hack-job done by a schoolmate in the first place (and the 'asymmetrical bob' that the 'hairstylist' did — I'd love to see pictures of what that looked like, btw), or let her sit there with a weird haircut and be ridiculed, teased, and humiliated by her peers.  I would rather see someone, with all good intent, try to ameliorate the damage already done rather than let the victim suffer ridicule and verbal abuse at the hands of her classmates.

And if you even TRY tell me that this doesn't happen, then I've got just one question for you.  What color is the sky on whatever little planet it is that YOU are living on?
Image
-"BB"-

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 5:13 pm
by Scooter
Did you actually read what happened? Her parents took her to a stylist to get her hair fixed as best it could be after it was hacked at by another student. Two days later the librarian cut it all off, for reasons that neither she nor the school have deemed appropriate to make public.

Still say assault with a deadly weapon = prison.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 8:24 pm
by ex-khobar Andy
The librarian should have had the common sense to leave it alone.

If the circumstances are as they were initially reported, the librarian - a trained cosmetologist - tried to repair the damage at the request of the child.

She should have said no. SHE SHOULD HAVE SAID NO. But assault with a deadly weapon is harsh for what was, based on what I have seen reported, a misguided attempt to make the girl feel better.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 8:39 pm
by Crackpot
That is not an initial report

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 9:29 pm
by Sue U
That is one bad haircut. And the librarian/cosmetologist never should have done it without asking the parents first -- and probably even then should have declined. But kids get and survive bad haircuts every day across our fair land. Why is this somehow national/international news?

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 9:50 pm
by Crackpot
I was surprised to see it go beyond state. Though I think the publicity goes to the expanded awareness that “all hair is not the same”.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2021 10:13 pm
by BoSoxGal
Yes children survive bad haircuts but this is not that. This is TEACHERS and school librarians imposing a radical haircut on a seven year old child - even if as they allege ‘she asked for it’ (FUCKING victim shaming), it goes way past ‘poor judgment’ for them to have acquiesced to that request. (To be clear I am far more inclined to believe the girl was coerced by the ‘helpful suggestions’ of her teacher and librarian.)

You can damn well bet that if anyone anywhere had taken shears to the hair of teacher’s child, or librarian’s child, without their permissions - beatings would commence.

These white women decided what was best for that poor nappy headed child and they imposed their will and their opinions on her AND her grown parents. The whole thing involved no shortage of humiliation for the little girl, I am sure.

I honestly can’t see how anyone could think this is no big deal and unworthy of being in the larger conversation over the persistent toxic racism in this country. How is it any different from coaches and referees demanding that black student athletes cut all their braids off in the middle of a sporting event to meet some arbitrary regulation on attire/appearance in sport?

Incidentally it may be no big deal for anyone else here, but in many cultures including among plenty of white people I’ve known in my life, cutting off the hair for the first time is a big fucking deal. For little boys and little girls alike. The kind of gall that it takes to take shears to another person’s child’s head is almost beyond comprehension to me. Any rational responsible school administrator would recognize that this manifestation of colossal poor judgment is substantive enough to merit departure from positions of authority over children.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:36 am
by Bicycle Bill
Sue U wrote:
Thu Jul 08, 2021 9:29 pm
That is one bad haircut. And the librarian/cosmetologist never should have done it without asking the parents first -- and probably even then should have declined. But kids get and survive bad haircuts every day across our fair land. Why is this somehow national/international news?
Because someone played the B-card, claiming the haircut was done for racist reasons.
 
BoSoxGal wrote:
Thu Jul 08, 2021 10:13 pm
How is it any different from coaches and referees demanding that black student athletes cut all their braids off in the middle of a sporting event to meet some arbitrary regulation on attire/appearance in sport?
How about, "because the regulation was there already, and the POC student athlete and/or coach, school, or regulatory group, for whatever purpose, ignored it up until the time someone DID make an issue of it?" I mean, rules change all the time – look at some of the new ones with regard to 'littering' or 'riding position on the bicycle' for the Tour de France and pro cycling this year, for example — and it is the athletes' (or the coaches') responsibility to make sure they stay on the correct side of them at all times.

By the way, you yourself broke one of the latest 'rules' and forgot to capitalize 'Black', in accordance to whatever 'woke' group managed to push that into the stylebooks of most major publications, including the NYTimes and the Chicago Tribune.  Shame, shame on you!
Image
-"BB"-

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 9:19 am
by Gob
This is the trouble when you make everything about "race", the truth becomes harder to find.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:03 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
The way to move forward in authenticity, real meaningful progress and change, combat systemic racism, and hold school systems to task is by offering an apology, restitution, and viable solutions to ensure this type of situation never happens again.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the episode (and cutting the child's hair without parental consent was monumentally stupid), the choice of words used in the quote from the poodle-fake "parent" organization above is absolutely indicative of asshole-speak.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 2:27 pm
by Crackpot
Not really, the flat out ignorance of different racial hair types is indicative of systemic racism. It may stem simply from ignorance rather than historical superiority or other malevolence we are used to seeing but it is a marker none the less. The simple fact the librarian did not know that her cosmetologist training DID NOT qualify her to work on all hair types illustrates this.

The thing about being ignorant is by definition you don’t know it.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:28 pm
by Long Run
Bicycle Bill wrote:
Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:36 am
By the way, you yourself broke one of the latest 'rules' and forgot to capitalize 'Black',
That's one of the peris of getting a word wrong.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:28 pm
by Joe Guy
I think in Gob's case, he accidentally wrote 'peris' because he was distracted because he was probably posting while using his newly purchased Clean Butt Bundle.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 1:36 am
by ex-khobar Andy
Crackpot wrote:
Fri Jul 09, 2021 2:27 pm
Not really, the flat out ignorance of different racial hair types is indicative of systemic racism. It may stem simply from ignorance rather than historical superiority or other malevolence we are used to seeing but it is a marker none the less. The simple fact the librarian did not know that her cosmetologist training DID NOT qualify her to work on all hair types illustrates this.

The thing about being ignorant is by definition you don’t know it.
Oh for crying out loud. I've had my hair cut by barbers of several different races and sexes and probably (I don't ask) by some somewhere on the LGBQT spectrum. I've had good haircuts (according to my wife) and bad haircuts (again, according to my wife) and I have never attempted to correlate the quality of the cut with the race, sex or sexuality of the cutter.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 1:58 am
by Scooter
The issue isn't the race of the cutter, rather their knowledge and experience in cutting the hair of your race.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 2:03 am
by Joe Guy
BoSoxGal wrote:
Thu Jul 08, 2021 3:53 pm
In what universe is it remotely okay to cut a child’s hair at school, without prior consultation of parents?
Not in any universe I've lived in.
BoSoxGal wrote:
Thu Jul 08, 2021 3:53 pm
How is this not a criminal assault?
Are you saying that you believe the librarian attempted to inflict offensive physical contact or bodily harm?

BoSoxGal wrote:
Thu Jul 08, 2021 3:53 pm
How does this librarian not get fired?
I don't believe the librarian should be fired for cutting a child's hair unless the person has a history of problems on the job.

BoSoxGal wrote:
Thu Jul 08, 2021 3:53 pm
And yes, this kind of incident can deeply wound a child for a lifetime, depending on the circumstances and the level of humiliation involved. This one falls squarely into the basket of proof that some people go into childcare and school settings for the many opportunities it affords to hurt children. I don’t believe for a minute that this librarian hasn’t hurt plenty of other children over 20 years of access to them.
That's quite a leap to judgement and assumes that this librarian is a child predator of some type

BoSoxGal wrote:
Thu Jul 08, 2021 3:53 pm
If this was my child that librarian would be in a world of pain.
I'd want to know a lot more than what is in the linked article. As far as we know, the child may not have been traumatized until after the parents and/or other adults started pointing out that something terrible had happened. Turning it into a racist accusation certainly isn't helping the child in any way I can imagine.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 2:08 am
by Scooter
The racial issue arises because the woman clearly had zero knowledge of how to cut the hair of a person of this girl's racial makeup. She should have known enough to leave it to a professional's care.

Re: Mind boggling

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 2:29 am
by Joe Guy
Scooter wrote:
Sat Jul 10, 2021 2:08 am
The racial issue arises because the woman clearly had zero knowledge of how to cut the hair of a person of this girl's racial makeup. She should have known enough to leave it to a professional's care.
An unauthorized bad haircut is the issue. Bringing race into the discussion because the child happens to bi-racial is ridiculous. Besides, if the child is half white and the complaint is that the haircut wasn't cut in an 'Afro-American' style, the haircut is technically only half bad. Also, if race is an issue, it seems to me that the child's parent could have also had the option to complain that the haircut wasn't white enough.

All I'm saying is they should drop the race card and deal with the unauthorized haircut, preferably without dragging the child into the public forum. (too late for that)