Page 1 of 1

Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From...

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:47 pm
by Lord Jim
"British Understatement":
Scots Guard removed from Royal Wedding duty for making vile slurs against Kate Middleton

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 9:09 AM on 25th April 2011

* Bearskin, 18, called her 'posh b****' and 'stuck-up cow' on Facebook after perceived snub
* Said he fantasised about shooting Jews while on duty
* Described London as a 'Paki holding cell'


A Palace guard has been banned from the Royal Wedding parade for making vicious online rants about Kate Middleton after she apparently 'snubbed' him.

Scots Guardsman Cameron Reilly, 18, also said he had 'attacked a black man' while on leave in his home town of East Kilbride near Glasgow and fantasised about shooting Jews while on duty.

He called Miss Middleton, who is due to marry Prince William at Westminster Abbey on Friday, a 'stuck-up cow', adding: 'Who really gives a f*** about her?'

Eighteen-year-old Scots Guardman Cameron Reilly, who lists "causing trouble" and "super-strength lager" among his interests on his since-removed Facebook profile, wrote of Catherine and Will: "hur and william drove past me on friday n all a got was a shitty wave while she looked the opposite way from me, stupid stuck up cow am a not good enough for them! posh bitch am totally with u on this 1 who reely gives a f*** about hur." [What was he expecting...that she'd flash her tits?]

Reilly, who joined the army last year, was scheduled to be among the several hundred Scots Guards lining the route of the wedding procession from Westminster Abbey to Buckingham Palace on Friday.

Reilly is also being investigated for racist and anti-Semitic comments left on the site, the UK Press Association reports. Among the items: "a was gonae put a few rifles in ma bergan anaw but then a remembered a couldnt fit any in cause a had 2 many paki's scalps in it already."

The Ministry of Defence said in a statement: "In view of the nature of the allegation, it would not be appropriate for the individual to be on parade for The Royal Wedding."

They will line the route of the Wedding procession for the newlyweds from Westminster Abbey to Buckingham Palace.

He is regularly one of the soldiers who patrols outside the palace in iconic red tunic and bearskin hat, much beloved of tourists.

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence refused to reveal whether the Palace guards carry live ammunition in their weapons as it is 'a matter of operational security.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1KYdP8yja

I realize that 18 is an age when most males have the Stupid Meter turned up to "full", but somehow I suspect that Guardsman Reilly may have partaken of his " "super-strength lager" prior to penning these observations....

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:43 pm
by @meric@nwom@n
He also appears to be illiterate.

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:24 pm
by Lord Jim
He also appears to be illiterate.
Which raises another question....

I would have thought that being chosen to be a member of The Scots Guard would have been sort of an "elite" thing....

Not something that any semi-literate hooligan who managed to not washout of basic training could immediately join....

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:05 pm
by @meric@nwom@n
Apparently not. I guess all you have to do is be able to stand for long hours wearing that huge hat.

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:06 pm
by The Hen
I would imagine the non-literate might be able to hat wear better and longer than the literate.

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:33 pm
by Gob
Eighteen-year-old Scots Guardsman Cameron Reilly, who lists "causing trouble" and "super-strength lager" among his interests
That was my LOL moment for this morning, a man that honest should go far.

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:36 pm
by Lord Jim
I would imagine the non-literate might be able to hat wear better and longer than the literate.
That's a good point...

Having a head that doesn't have to multi-task as anything other than a hat rack is probably an advantage in that line of work....

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:41 pm
by Long Run
Kind of ends the mystery of the royal guard. And why is it that we don't seem to go a day without seeing some happy fingered goofball losing their job, getting arrested, or otherwise screwing up their life by posting on their Facebook page. They could at least post semi-anonymously on a bulletin board!

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:44 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
This is really Charlie Sheen aint it? Come on out from under that hat Charlie; we can see your legs dangling down

Re: Well, Here's A Fellow Who Certainly Doesn't Suffer From.

Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:34 am
by loCAtek
I thought Scotchgardâ„¢ was supposed to protect from spills?