Page 1 of 5
Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:11 am
by Joe Guy
Hi quad.
I was wondering if you might want to apologize to me for lying to the people of this BBS about things you claim to have discovered about me and accusing me of being a pedophile.
It would go a long way toward improving the quality of communications at this BBS.
I'm willing to forgive and forget.
Just a thought that I hope you might consider.
Have a nice day.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:17 am
by loCAtek
Are you channeling Gob, now?
...won't be long before he starts Plan Z. 
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:21 am
by Joe Guy
loCAtek wrote:Are you channeling Gob, now?
How is that 'channeling Gob'?
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:07 am
by loCAtek
All the threads he started on CSB, calling out Editec and ~Steve, for just that reason.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:12 am
by Scooter
And so because edi and Steve accused people of vile things at the CSB, that makes it ok to accuse Joe of being a pedophile?
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:20 am
by loCAtek
Who said that?
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:40 am
by Sean
Should've guessed that you would ignore anything posted by your friend that didn't fit with your agenda...
I admire your magnanimity Joe but I wouldn't hold your breath if I were you. What he called you is beyond the pale and would not be tolerated on any forum I have ever known. I sincerely hope that this one is no different but that's up to the powers that be.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:47 am
by Scooter
loCAtek wrote:Who said that?
You did. By criticizing Joe for calling him on it, you are condoning it.
Lie down with dogs...
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:01 am
by loCAtek
Hmmm, my first comment was initially a joke, note the smiley, but when asked to explain it, my jibe was because;
loCAtek wrote:All the threads [Gob] started on CSB, calling out Editec and ~Steve, for just that reason.
The reason for the call out being:
Joe wrote:It would go a long way toward improving the quality of communications at this BBS.
I haven't posted anything in for support or against Quad statements, basically because I don't have an opinion about that.
Why? Did you think the calling out threads were helpful to CSB?
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:05 am
by Scooter
Then you should have extended you "no opinion" to the polite way in which Joe chose to deal with the false accusations against him.
And the fact that you would have "no opinion" about a false accusation of pedophilia speaks volumes.
In any event, Joe had a purpose for this thread which you are attempting to derail, so I won't indulge you any further. You can go back to swigging from your bottle now.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:12 am
by Joe Guy
loCAtek wrote:
Why? Did you think the calling out threads were helpful to CSB?
There's a very good chance that in this case it would be helpful for quad to respond and in the end Plan B would benefit.
I'm not asking for people to criticize or condemn quad.
I'm only asking that he apologize to me and admit to lying.
The reason I'm doing this publicly is because his apology is meaningless if others here don't see it.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:32 am
by BoSoxGal
Joe Guy wrote:The reason I'm doing this publicly is because his apology is meaningless if others here don't see it.
That's so true.
There is nothing more cowardly than one who would attack you publicly and extend the olive branch by PM. I've experienced that hypocrisy myself and find it disgusting.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:41 am
by Sean
I'm with you both on that. It never sat right with me that Steve's apology to Strop and Hen on the CSB was allowed to be done privately. If the slur/false accusation is public then the apology should also be public.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:13 am
by quaddriver
Repeated, *I* did not accuse you of anything.
BSG however did commit a federal offense.
So we have a citizen with a long documented history of stalking and harassment, now an ADA threatening the same.
For her to accuse me of misusing govt resources, she has to prove it. she has no proof.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:36 am
by loCAtek
Joe Guy wrote:loCAtek wrote:
Why? Did you think the calling out threads were helpful to CSB?
Well. that was addressed to Scooter, but he choose have no opinion to a direct question, which I assume speaks larger volumes.
Joe Guy wrote:
There's a very good chance that in this case it would be helpful for quad to respond and in the end Plan B would benefit.
I'm not asking for people to criticize or condemn quad.
That's what I thought, thX for clearing that up;what which so many folks filling volumes by making no comment during that, or this thread.
Joe Guy wrote:
I'm only asking that he apologize to me and admit to lying.
The reason I'm doing this publicly is because his apology is meaningless if others here don't see it.
Well, looks like you got your answer; maybe not the answer you wanted, but an answer. Thread over? Or, do you think beating another dead horse is going to help this BBS?
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:38 am
by Sean
LMFAO - Quad is not only above the law, he IS the law!
I just hope I haven't committed any federal offences lately...
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:44 am
by Lord Jim
I am allowed to use FPS or Tigta. and I did.
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA)
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)
Name of System: TIGTA Enterprise System (TES)
10. What controls will be used to prevent unauthorized monitoring?
TIGTA Rules of Behavior state “Do not access, research, or change any account, file,
record, or application not required in performing your official duties". TIGTA
employees should always verify that the request of accessing data has been authorized.
All TIGTA employees are required to undergo yearly security, privacy and ethics
training. System access is monitored closely and if a user or an administrator violates
the organization’s security policies is subject to disciplinary action, up to and including
termination of employment. TES users, administrators, and helpdesk personnel protect TIGTA from unwanted access and are on the front line in the organization’s ability to respond to incidents.
http://www.treasury.gov/tigta/docs/priv ... ssment.pdf
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:46 am
by Sean
loCAtek wrote:
Well, looks like you got your answer; maybe not the answer you wanted, but an answer. Thread over? Or, do you think beating another dead horse is going to help this BBS?
So wanting an apology for what Quad called Joe is "beating another dead horse" in you opinion is it?
It shows the level of your morals...
And since when do you give a fuck about helping this BBS?
PS After what Jim just posted... Enjoy your new career at Maccas Quad!
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:00 am
by loCAtek
Never underestimate people desire to hear what they want to hear and ignore what they don't
Order of debate:
Joe asked for an apology.
Quad choose not to give it.
Loca said, looks like you got your answer.
What you've done Sean is put the cart before the dead horse.
Re: Request to Quaddriver
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:25 am
by Sean
So Joe should just shut up and forget about it for the good of the board?
Is that what you're attempting to say?
What you've done Sean is put the cart before the dead horse.
It's best to look up the meaning of phrases before you use them. Otherwise you tend to look stupid rather than clever and witty...