Sorry to be nitpicky, bit if discussion is needed, could that just be discussed in the thread it originated from? (wherever that it, and whatever context it is or isn't in)
I thought we'd had enough of dragging grudges all over the forum.
Didn't we just ban someone for (over)doing that?
Again, apologies. But it feels like this whole crow-picking-eyes thing is moving from one person, to another, to another. Can't we all learn a lesson from what happened with locaTEK?
Life is like photography. You use the negative to develop.
Alice, you may not have caught this, but I was recently accused of being beastly to this innocent, well meaning lad...
All I wanted to do was set the record straight, and let his words speak for themselves....
From now on, whenever anyone 'round these parts expresses a view that reveals themselves to be delusional enough to think rube is an innocent victim, I will simply repost this:
Killing criminals is mostly driven by the emotional retardation of a part of the population who cannot achieve sexual release w/o killing someone.
yrs,
rubato
And hopefully that will jar them back to reality....
alice wrote:Sorry to be nitpicky, bit if discussion is needed, could that just be discussed in the thread it originated from? (wherever that it, and whatever context it is or isn't in)
I thought we'd had enough of dragging grudges all over the forum.
Didn't we just ban someone for (over)doing that?
Again, apologies. But it feels like this whole crow-picking-eyes thing is moving from one person, to another, to another. Can't we all learn a lesson from what happened with locaTEK?
I concur!
And for the record, as one who has familiarized herself with forensic psychology, there is a segment of the murderous population that achieves sexual climax from the act. This is well accepted in the criminal forensic psychology field.
And I simply don't see how that remark should personally offend any poster on the board. I will say again, as one who came after 'the event', whatever it was, that I don't see how this poster's comments on various topics deserves such responses.
But then, I also don't get how someone wants to sit down to dinner with some who has accused them of being a lying scam artist.
Call me
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
I can not believe you are actually trying to defend this...
And for the record, as one who has familiarized herself with forensic psychology, there is a segment of the murderous population that achieves sexual climax from the act. This is well accepted in the criminal forensic psychology field.
Words fail me...
(And that doesn't happen very often....)
Let me show you this one more time:
Killing criminals is mostly driven by the emotional retardation of a part of the population who cannot achieve sexual release w/o killing someone.
yrs,
rubato
You find that stunningly ignorant statement to be something you can agree with? That you can make excuses for?
I do believe that those who vehemently support the death penalty are emotionally and intellectually . . . limited. Yes, I believe that.
And I also believe that LJ and others have a hard on for attacking rubato, no matter how sensible anything he says might be. I think this was a point on which even Andrew D and I agreed, if I recall correctly. Weird, that.
Clearly some personal conflict is required for some to be happy here.
Duly noted.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
To be honest, your attitude towards rubato reminds me of the women who wanted to get "involved" with Richard The Night Stalker " Ramirez, in Southern California....
I'm not going to defend what Rubato has said but I am here defending his right to say it. He may have half strayed into personal attacks , but does anyone really think goading him is doing this place any good!
I reckon if you leave him alone put him on ignore if you must and move on, there are so many other things we could be talking about.
"From now on, whenever anyone 'round these parts expresses a view that reveals themselves to be delusional enough to think rube is an innocent victim, I will simply repost this"
Sometimes rubato is an innocent victim - this thread being a prime example.
Looks over shoulder for stalker...
Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
If I don't agree with you, you have to start attacking me by slinging shit like that? I'm hot for rubato because I'm sick of you always wanting to get into shit with somebody - Steve, editec, Gwen, Andrew D, loCA, rubato.
I didn't say it before because I didn't want to believe it; but sure enough, you'll start attacking me next so long as it gives you someone to sling mud at.
Grow the fuck up already.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
How many of our well meaning good hearted liberals would care to associate themselves with this:
