Surfer Benjamin Linden, 24, was bitten in half in a savage attack on Saturday, the fifth such fatality in the region in less than a year.
He was surfing near Wedge Island, north of Perth, with a friend when he was mauled by the huge shark, said to be up to 16 feet long.
A man jet-skiing near him said it was a gruesome scene, with "half a torso" all that remained of Linden.
Surfers said they had noticed a large shark in the vicinity in the previous few days and nicknamed it "Brutus" due to its large size.
Local marine scientists have described Australia's west coast as the deadliest shark attack zone in the world and Western Australia Fisheries Minister Norman Moore expressed concern at the trend of fatalities.
"We have allocated some Aus$14 million (£9 million) extra to get a better understanding of the great white sharks and the reasons why the fatalities are occurring," he told reporters.
"I wonder if research might tell us that there are now much greater number of great whites than ever before, and maybe we should look at whether they should remain a protected species.
"This is a very distressing event and to add to the previous four fatalities, it is of great concern to me and to the fisheries department, indeed the government as a whole."
A tagging and tracking programme was introduced last year and has shown the animals, which have no predators other than humans, whales and other sharks, can linger off Australia's west coast for months at a time.
Moore said he was open to "any suggestions from anybody as to where we go to now, because we seriously have got a problem".
After the last fatal attack in March, state premier Colin Barnett ruled out a culling programme, saying it was impossible to protect all people at all times.
"While it's still a rare occurrence, the ocean is the domain of the shark and we go there with a risk always," he said at the time.
Sharks are a common feature of Australian waters but fatal attacks are rare.
Experts say the average number of attacks in Australia – about 15 a year, with at least one being fatal – have increased in line with population growth and the popularity of water sports.
Linden's girlfriend Alana Noakes posted a tribute to him on Facebook.
"I'm devastated to let everyone know that my beautiful man ... was the surfer who was taken by the shark at Wedge," she said.
"He was the love of my life, my best friend, my rock and my soulmate.
"Let's remember that he was doing something that meant the world to him. Surfing was his soul, his life, his culture and his passion."
Western Australian waters are home to more than 100 species of shark, according to the state fisheries department, ranging in size from the pygmy shark at just 30 centimetres, to the whale shark that grows up to 12 metres.
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:01 am
by loCAtek
"We have allocated some Aus$14 million (£9 million) extra to get a better understanding of the great white sharks and the reasons why the fatalities are occurring," he told reporters.
Answer: The sharks were hungry.
That'll be US$ 1 million, please.... heck, I'm not greedy.
Go Sharks!
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:07 am
by BoSoxGal
My understanding is that sharks bite people because in the water people resemble seals - their prey.
Maybe, if people are determined to be in shark infested waters, our efforts should go into researching ways to make people unattractive to sharks?
But overall, given the number of sharks & people, to die of shark attack is still an exceedingly rare occurrence anywhere in the world.
eta: whether or not sharks remain protected should be decided purely by wildlife management standards, not by whether people sometimes get eaten by sharks. You can't prevent those rare deaths by killing some sharks.
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:35 am
by Econoline
Yeah, that would make the remaining sharks even angrier.
Hey, Loca, your Sharks logo seems quite appropriate in this thread!
Go Sharks!
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:39 am
by Gob
Interestingly, shark attacks on human rarely have anything to do with them being hungry, BSG is correct.
Why Sharks Attack
Ninety percent or more of shark incidents are mistakes. They assume that we're something that we are not.- Gary Adkison, diver ("Sharkbite! Surviving the Great White")
Although shark attacks can seem vicious and brutal, it's important to remember that sharks aren't evil creatures constantly on the lookout for humans to attack. They are animals obeying their instincts, like all other animals. As predators at the top of the ocean food chain, sharks are designed to hunt and eat large amounts of meat. A shark's diet consists of other sea creatures -- mainly fish, sea turtles, whales and sea lions and seals. Humans are not on the menu. In fact, humans don't provide enough high-fat meat for sharks, which need a lot of energy to power their large, muscular bodies.
If sharks aren't interested in eating humans, why do they attack us? The first clue comes in the pattern that most shark attacks take. In the majority of recorded attacks, the shark bites the victim, hangs on for a few seconds (possibly dragging the victim through the water or under the surface), and then lets go. It is very rare for a shark to make repeated attacks and actually feed on a human victim. The shark is simply mistaking a human for something it usually eats. Once the shark gets a taste, it realizes that this isn't its usual food, and it lets go.
The shark's confusion is easier to understand once we start to look at things from the shark's point of view. Many attack victims are surfers or people riding boogie boards. A shark swimming below sees a roughly oval shape with arms and legs dangling off, paddling along. This bears a close resemblance to a sea lion (the main prey of great white sharks) or a sea turtle (a common food for tiger sharks).
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:54 am
by Econoline
So they are hungry, then...but they're hungry for fish, sea turtles, whales, sea lions and seals--not humans. I guess that dead surfer in the OP must've really really looked like a seal or a whale--so much so that the shark didn't bother taking a preliminary nibble just to find out what he was. Afterwards, it probably said, "EWWW, YUCK! I coulda SWORN that was a seal up there!"
Go Sharks!
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:01 am
by loCAtek
Yup, didn't say they were smart, just ravenous.
Go Sharks!
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:08 pm
by dgs49
Yet another example of the things people do for fun that entail a real - hopefully remote - possibility of serious bodily harm. The examples are too numerous to count:
mountain climbing,
parachuting,
racing cars or motorcycles,
mountain biking,
surfing,
unprotected sex with partners in high-risk groups,...
The trouble with the shark attacks is that there is nobody you can sue.
Re: Jaws needs protection, or does he?
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:32 pm
by Beer Sponge
Why not sue lawyers? They're all a bunch of sharks anyway...