Page 1 of 2
Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:24 am
by dales
Cold days in Hades would appear more likely.
Prosecutor opposes release of ex-Manson devotee
By LINDA DEUTSCH, AP Special Correspondent
Updated 5:27 pm, Tuesday, January 29, 2013
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Los Angeles district attorney says she is opposing the impending release of Bruce Davis, a former Charles Manson follower who has spent more than 40 years in prison.
District Attorney Jackie Lacey sent a letter to Gov. Jerry Brown last week urging him to reverse a parole panel's decision to grant Davis freedom.
The 70-year-old Davis was convicted with Manson and another man in the killings of a musician and a stuntman. He was not involved in the infamous Sharon Tate murders.
[scramblehead played them all for chumps]
Lacey says Davis still lacks insight and genuine remorse for his crimes.
Monday will be the end of a 120-day review period by the entire parole board. If they uphold Davis' parole recommendation, Brown then has 30 days to review the decision and either approve or reject it.
Read more:
http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/articl ... z2JQ8Epl1o
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:25 pm
by Scooter
So just because he committed his crimes in concert with Charles Manson, means that he should never be released, even if he meets all the requirements for being granted parole?
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:33 pm
by Joe Guy
Scooter wrote:So just because he committed his crimes in concert with Charles Manson, means that he should never be released, even if he meets all the requirements for being granted parole?
Lacey says Davis still lacks insight and genuine remorse for his crimes.
Apparently the DA doesn't believe Davis meets those requirements.
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:07 pm
by Scooter
Well of course he has to say that, doesn't he? He can't say that they have no intention of letting any Manson follower go free except feet first in a box.
Given the record of granting paroie to those who committed murder with or under the orders of Manson (zero, until now), it's safe to say that parole would not have been recommended in this instance without a very compelling case being made. Clearly the reports made by prison officials must have been very favourable. What does the DA have to contradict that?
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:07 pm
by dales
It's all CA politics.
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:01 pm
by dales
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:03 am
by Lord Jim
Good for Brown.
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:03 am
by Big RR
Good for Brown? Have you been following the story and can you provide us with some insight?
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:07 am
by Lord Jim
I looked up and read the details of this when Dale posted it initially, Big RR....
It was grisly, black hearted, and cold blooded...
The guy should just be glad he didn't go to the gas chamber decades ago. (Which is what he deserved)
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:18 am
by Lord Jim
I'll say this for Brown....
By the time he became Mayor of Oakland, he had abandoned his 70's era mushy headed navel gazing attitude about crime and punishment...
By then he had become a hard nosed realist about law and order, and as a result, the city of Oakland enjoyed the greatest improvement in crime numbers in at least the 26 years I've lived in the Bay Area (homicide dropped by nearly 25% and overall crime by 22%)
Every other mayor who has run that city in the time I have lived out here has been a complete incompetent and an abysmal failure in that department. (And most others as well.)
The one they've got now is quite possibly the absolute worst....
(And that's saying something; after Dellums' catastrophic performance, one would have thought someone being even worse would be a logical impossibility.... )
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:52 am
by dales
Oakland can do so much better.
Quan has to go.
As far as Bruce Davis is concerned, the only way he'll get out of prison is in a pine box. Susan Atkins (another Mansonite) died in Prison Sept 2009 with terminal cancer and a sawed-off leg.
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:41 pm
by Jarlaxle
Lord Jim wrote:I'll say this for Brown....
By the time he became Mayor of Oakland, he had abandoned his 70's era mushy headed navel gazing attitude about crime and punishment...
By then he had become a hard nosed realist about law and order, and as a result, the city of Oakland enjoyed the greatest improvement in crime numbers in at least the 26 years I've lived in the Bay Area (homicide dropped by nearly 25% and overall crime by 22%)
Every other mayor who has run that city in the time I have lived out here has been a complete incompetent and an abysmal failure in that department. (And most others as well.)
The one they've got now is quite possibly the absolute worst....
(And that's saying something; after Dellums' catastrophic performance, one would have thought someone being even worse would be a logical impossibility.... )
My sister lives in Oakland & loves it.
Of course, she lives in a secure complex with gated entry & 24 hour security.

I have never seen anyone as willing to ignore the obvious as my sister.
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:39 pm
by Gob
Wasn't Oakland where the orignal "Hells Angels" formed?
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:06 pm
by dales
San Berdoo
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:21 pm
by Gob
Ideas vary..
History
The Hells Angels were originally started by Scottish-American war immigrants, the Bishop family in Fontana, California[8] followed by an amalgamation of former members from different motorcycle clubs, such as The Pissed Off Bastards of Bloomington. The Hells Angels' website denies the suggestion that any misfit or malcontent troops are connected with the motorcycle club. However, the website also notes that the name was suggested by Arvid Olson, an associate of the founders, who had served in the Flying Tigers' "Hells Angels" squadron in China during World War II. The name "Hells Angels" was inspired by the typical naming of squadrons, or other fighting groups, with a fierce, death-defying title in both World War I and World War II, e.g., the Flying Tigers (American Volunteer Group) in Burma and China fielded three squadrons of P-40s and the third Squadron was called "Hell's Angels". In 1930, Howard Hughes film Hell's Angels displayed extraordinary and dangerous feats of aviation, and it is believed that the World War II groups who used that name based it on the film.
Some of the early history of the HAMC is not clear, and accounts differ. According to Ralph 'Sonny' Barger, founder of the Oakland chapter, early chapters of the club were founded in San Francisco, Gardena, Fontana, as well as his chapter in Oakland, and other places independently of one another, with the members usually being unaware that there were other Hells Angels clubs.
Other sources claim that the Hells Angels in San Francisco were originally organized in 1953 by Rocky Graves, a Hells Angel member from San Bernardino ("Berdoo") implying that the "Frisco" Hells Angels were very much aware of their forebears. The "Frisco" Hells Angels were reorganized in 1955 with thirteen charter members, Frank Sadilek serving as President, and using the smaller, original logo. The Oakland chapter, at the time headed by Barger used a larger version of the "Death's Head" patch nicknamed the "Barger Larger" which was first used in 1959. It later became the club standard.
The Hells Angels are often depicted in a similarly mythical fashion as other modern-day legends like the James-Younger Gang; free-spirited, iconic, bound by brotherhood and loyalty. At other times, such as in the 1966 Roger Corman film The Wild Angels where they are depicted as violent and nihilistic, they are portrayed as a violent criminal gang and a scourge on society.
The club became prominent within, and established its initial notoriety as part of, the 1960s counterculture movement in San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury scene, London, in England, and elsewhere where it played a part at many of the movement's seminal events. Original members were directly connected to many of the counterculture's primary leaders, such as Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters, Allen Ginsberg, Jerry Garcia and The Grateful Dead, Timothy Leary, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Mick Farren and Tom Wolfe. The club launched the career of "Gonzo" journalist Hunter S. Thompson.Criminologist Karen Katz said in 2011 that the Hells Angels were the center of a moral panic in Canada involving the media, politicians, law enforcement and the public that sensationalized the importance of isolated criminal acts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hells_Angels#History
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:47 pm
by rubato
Jerry Brown was a hard-nosed realist when he was first governor and refused the wastrel Imperial Trappings which Reagan instituted like the governors mansion and chauffeur.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 12:24 am
by Econoline
Plus...he was dating Linda Ronstadt!
(Note: Now I just KNOW that some mean-spirited spoilsport is going to want to find a recent photo of her and post it. Please please please do us all a favor and DON'T. Why ruin a beautiful memory?)
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:27 am
by dales
rubato wrote:Jerry Brown was a hard-nosed realist ....
yrs,
rubato
That's why "Moonbeam" ceased construction of CA freeways while in office. He wanted Californians to abandon their cars. That's some "hard-nosed realism" for ya!
LOL

Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 5:14 pm
by Jarlaxle
IIRC, the Hell's Angels originated in Burbank...their original name was POBOB (Pissed-Off Bastards Of Burbank).
Re: Will Manson Follower Go Free?
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:57 pm
by rubato
Still more delusional fantasies from Dales.
Try supporting them with facts?
yrs,
rubato