Page 1 of 1
More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:07 am
by Gob
A canteen worker at a top private school , who was caught sending out 'depraved' child porn pictures over the internet, has escaped a prison sentence.
Paul Harding, 50, shared films of children as young as six being abused and had more images on his home computer.
He also visited online chat sites where he told other paedophiles how he wanted to 'groom' a child who he would use to recruit other youngsters.
Harding, a catering supervisor at prestigious Dulwich College in southeast London, was spared jail by Judge Andrew Goymer who was a former student there.
He said: 'You have escaped prison by a gap so narrow that you could hardly see daylight through it.
'It needs to be spelled out that when these images are produced somewhere in the world a child is being abused to make them to satisfy the depraved tastes of people who enjoy looking at them.'
Harding was handed a 16-month prison term, suspended for a year, and banned from working with children indefinitely.
Officers from the Metropolitan Police's paedophile unit swooped on his home address in May 2012 as part of an ongoing crackdown on online child abusers, Southwark Crown Court heard.
Peter Zinner, prosecuting, said: 'As a result of these investigations an individual was identified.
'It was further established that individual was Paul Harding and that he was in the employ of Dulwich Boys School as a catering supervisor.
'Because of his proximity to boys and the suspicion that he might be a paedophile police officers expedited the application for a search warrant and on May 3, 2012, police officers attended his home address.'
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:01 am
by Gob
These are the horrific injuries inflicted upon a young woman whose boyfriend flew into a rage when he was unable to withdraw money from a cash machine.
But despite the terrible wounds inflicted upon Loretta Butterworth, 22, by her boyfriend, Toby Hayden, 27, has been spared jail.
A woman who heard Miss Butterworth screaming 'please help me' said she saw Hayden holding her with one hand and hitting her face with the other.
His rage did not stop there and when police went to arrest him he spat in the face of one officer and tried to gouge the eyes of another.
Hayden was already serving a suspended prison sentence, but magistrates decided that not sending him to jail would be a tougher option.
Chairman of the bench Ms D Slater said: 'We are going to take the hard line by not activating the suspension order.
'Horfield [Bristol prison] would be the easy option, you could get this over with in four weeks.
'But this way you're going to spend the next year and a half addressing your behaviour.
'The suspended sentence will continue. If you breach it again, the next breach is undoubtedly going to activate that suspension order.'
After the hearing Miss Butterworth criticised the sentence and described how her face 'exploded like an airbag' during the assault.
She said: 'When I found out that he had walked free my heart sank. I was shocked and angry.
'He definitely should have gone to prison. He had previous convictions, he had been violent to people before, he was on probation when it happened.
'He resisted arrest, assaulted two police officers, caused criminal damage and that doesn't even cover what he did to me.
He punched me repeatedly, he didn't stop - but that wasn't enough for him so he kicked me in the back of the head as I lay on the floor unable to defend myself.
'He then stamped on my face before walking home to his parents. There was no remorse, there was no concern.'
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:06 am
by rubato
The young woman has no relatives or friends with baseball bats? Or those clumsy and ineffective-looking things you use for cricket?
No wonder you have a problem.
yrs,
rubato
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:39 am
by Gob
rubato wrote: The young woman has no relatives or friends with baseball bats? Or those clumsy and ineffective-looking things you use for cricket?
None that are stupid enough to advertise the fact in a national newspaper it would appear. Only a moron would consider them doing so to be apt, or their absence from advertising their intent in the article a problem.
rubato wrote:
No wonder you have a problem.
yrs,
rubato
Ah, yes, well there you go...
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:10 am
by rubato
So they've done nothing then?
yrs,
rubato
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:06 am
by Gob
What? How do you know?
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:49 am
by Sean
The Gweat and Powewful Wubato knows all!
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:18 am
by Gob
The amazing thing is that, what with rubato being so duplicious and moronic, he's the only person I've ever known who speaks out of both sides of his arse.
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:54 pm
by oldr_n_wsr
If it were my relative (especially my daughter or wife or nieces), things would be done. But being the pragmatic that I am they would not be done while the press is involved or recently covering the story. So to say nothing has been done only means "YET" or the news has not picked up on it.
Either way, hopefully he gets his just deserves.
never swung a cricket bat but it looks effective
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:07 pm
by Gob
Exactly O-n-W, rubato seems to think the article should have ended; "Miss Butterworth informs the Daily Mail that her two brothers, and an uncle and his two heavy mates, have set aside the fourth of April to go and beat Toby Hayden, to a bloody pulp, (Police, please do not read that last bit.)
He's an idiot.
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 11:56 pm
by Jarlaxle
Forget a bat...a couple feet of 200lb test fishing line and a couple of 6" wooden dowels work better. Whip it over his head, kick his feet out from under him, and PULL!
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:37 am
by rubato
Gob wrote:The amazing thing is that, what with rubato being so duplicious and moronic, he's the only person I've ever known who speaks out of both sides of his arse.
Still ,nothing?
Well that is one way to never telegraph your intentions. Do nothing! That'll fool them! They'll never catch you if you never do shit-all.
yrs,
rubato
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:06 am
by Lord Jim
Still ,nothing?
Well that is one way to never telegraph your intentions. Do nothing! That'll fool them! They'll never catch you if you never do shit-all.
yrs,
rubato
Christ on a crutch, you
really are the stupidest human being on the face of the planet, aren't you?
Rube, would you care to tell us, just one more time, the tale of the dog you had that you allowed to drag road kill back to your house?...

Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:05 pm
by Gob
He's still banging the "her brothers should advertise the fact that they are going to beat this guy up" drum? Jesus, how fucking dumb is he?
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 2:50 pm
by oldr_n_wsr
rubato wrote:So they've done nothing then?
yrs,
rubato
Just asking, are you advocating vigilante justice?
Would it involve a hand gun? and if so, a legal or illegal hand gun? How about an AR15 with a flash suppressor? Maybe a silencer or laser site?
Myself, I would have no problem "taking care" of the perp and even paying for that crime (jail time) had it been my daughter or wife (or sister or niece or sister in law or cousin or cousin inlaw or even good friends).
I'm protective that way
A girl who was the daughter of family friends (I was not good freinds with her but knew her pretty well) got beat up by her boyfriend way back in 1980. My future wife and I were sitting at a bar where they also were. (they went outside to argue). I followed a few minutes later and I saw the guy smack her across the face and then grabbed her by hte hair and started dragging her. He was then left unconcious on the sidewalk. I did have to drag him off the RR tracks as that was where their argument occured and I didn't want him to get run over by a train (well I did but, you know).
She actually ended up marrying the guy and I was invited to the wedding but did not go as I probably would have spoken up when the pastor asked " if anyone is opposed to this marriage". At least she finally got fed up and left him but only after a miscarriage or two. She had no brothers and her father had died. I cheered when the divorce was final and he moved away.
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:59 pm
by Gob
But did you advertise that you were going to beat the guy up, in a national newspaper, as rubato suggests?

Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:30 pm
by oldr_n_wsr
No sir, it was a "spur of the moment" kind of beat down.
And if something happened to one of the people I care about, those responsible would have no prior knowledge nor would anyone else. No good can come from letting your enemy know your plans or when they might be carried out.
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:46 pm
by rubato
And since they are obviously not going to do anything advertising is a moot point.
yrs,
rubato
Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:00 pm
by Gob
How do you know they are not? How do you know they exist even.
What a moron you are....

Re: More of that UK "justice."
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:42 pm
by oldr_n_wsr
rubato wrote:And since they are obviously not going to do anything advertising is a moot point.
yrs,
rubato
Advertising is stupid. You, nor I, would have prior knowledge if they were smart. We (you and I) do not know if they are going to do anything. Some people let justice play out. Others let justice play out and get their revenge later and others just let the justice system give out the sentences and accept the verdict. To each their own.