I AM taking shots, as it were, at her hyper-sanctimonious attitude and her super-egotism that tends to display itself every time she posts something, as if she was the final arbiter, the super-Supreme Court of the board, and her decision, opinions, and declarations were not to be contested in any way, shape, or form. If I had a dollar for every time she has not-so-casually dropped references to her esteemed (?) legal career, I could probably live comfortably for the remainder of my life.
I also find it mildly amusing that, for all her claims of her legal acumen and prowess, that her standard go-to when someone DOES stand up to her is not to debate the issue, not to argue the facts, not to attempt to prove her points, but to suggest that they perform auto-intercourse upon themselves. Or put them on 'ignore' — the cyber-equivalent of sticking both fingers in her ears and going "la-la-la-la-la-la-can't-hear-you!", like a spoiled little four-year-old.
And then I find it positively mind-boggling that she attempts to justify her misogynistic, man-hating screeds by claiming this is her unfiltered self, or by trotting out all the alleged horrors she has seen (and frankly, unless you've been in combat or worked as an EMT or ER nurse, I don't think you've seen jack shit) or the medical and mental things that are affecting her and expects everyone to accept her, flawed as she is, when she will not extend that courtesy to anyone else.
Now, I realize that she most likely won't see this (unless someone directs her attention to it — see the 'fingers in the ears' metaphor above), but for the benefit of the rest of you, I feel that I have as much right to explain myself as she does.
-"BB"-