Page 1 of 2

Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:37 am
by Daisy
If I don't get tickets to this I will scream and scream and scream until I'm sick!

Kate Bush announces first series of live shows since 1979

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:18 pm
by Lord Jim
You're welcome to the tickets they were saving for me...

I've never heard of her... :)

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:02 pm
by Daisy
What??????

Not even this?


Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:15 pm
by Lord Jim
To be honest Daze, that looks a little, uh, creepy... :? 8-) (I have a vague recollection of that song; I think a girl I dated in college may have had that album)

After I read the OP, I did a little reading up on Kate...

Apparently while she has been a genuine Big Deal in the UK, (and also has a following in Australia and New Zealand...as well as some other European countries) putting out 10 albums and winning numerous awards in Britain, (including making The Honours List in 2013; she is a "Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire") she has never even registered as a blimp on the radar screen here in The States. (Probably because she never toured; she's also been nominated for 3 Grammys but has never won.)

Three of her albums made it to #1 on the UK charts, she's had a Top Five album in each of five decades in Great Britain (the only female musician to accomplish that) and 25 Top 40 hits...

It's unusual for a performer to be that accomplished in the UK and virtually unheard of in the US, but it happens...

Again, I think her not touring probably played a big role in that...

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:31 pm
by Sue U
Uh, Jim, anyone who has listened to any college/indie radio in the last 30 years or so knows Kate Bush; she is unquestionably part of the pantheon. She is only "unheard of" to you, and I'm not at all sure I'd pick you to be programming my playlists.

Daisy, I suspect that if you do get tickets, you'll scream and scream and scream, too. :lol:

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:43 pm
by Big RR
I don't know Sue [sorry} Jim, I think it happens a lot, but we just don't hear much about it. Take the singer Lulu, besides To Sir with Love (in what, 1967?), I'd bet most in the US have never heard of her, but she's a pretty big presence on the music scene in the UK. I saw her in a theater concert in London in 2003/4, and she was a dynamic entertainer; she also has dozens of albums released in the UK. Not everything makes it "across the pond" either way.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:04 pm
by Lord Jim
She is only "unheard of" to you, and all other real Americans who don't follow snooty obscure radio stations whose broadcast range can be measured in blocks rather than miles
Fixed that for you... :fu :nana

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:37 pm
by Lord Jim
I'm not at all sure I'd pick you to be programming my playlists.
And just what is it exactly that you've got against accordion music?

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:41 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
Never heard of her either.... OTOH she's never heard of me.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:49 pm
by Crackpot
And just think she she doesn't even know how thankful she should be for that....



.... BTW I've heard of her. wouldn't know a song of hers if it was played for me but I was able to peg her as part of the "indie" crowd.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:04 am
by TPFKA@W
Never heard of her either.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:01 pm
by Sue U
Lord Jim wrote:
I'm not at all sure I'd pick you to be programming my playlists.
And just what is it exactly that you've got against accordion music?
I am actually very fond of accordion music, especially as played by Nathan Abshire, Steve Jordan and Flaco Jimenez, to name a few of my favorites.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:58 pm
by Joe Guy
I have a favorite accordion player also...

Image

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:53 pm
by Long Run
Joe, that's a weird post.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 7:12 pm
by Joe Guy
If it really bothers you, al yank it.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:07 pm
by Gob
Ah the lovely Kate, knocked a few out over her vidoes in the late 70's early 80's.

A warning from a reliable news source Daisy;
KATE Bush has announced her first live shows for 35 years but warned fans she is not quite the same.

The reclusive Wuthering Heights star said that while she had continued to ‘explore her creative landscape’ she had forgotten to moisturise since 1987.

She added: “I’m an obsessive artist so I can spend months hunched over a piano in the dark, stopping only to wolf down a Monster Munch sandwich and a two litre bottle of home made wine.

“The point is, I look like Lemmy now. It took a bit of getting used to, but now I prefer it.

Image

“Anyway, I’ve written 52 songs about butterflies which I think you’re going to enjoy.”
Why Kate Bush never made it in the USA..
She's too British. It's true that Bush, whose hometown has the veddy English name of Bexleyheath, never toned down her Britishness to universalize her appeal. Her music was cognizant (in ways obvious and not so much) of English music hall, sharp Romantic and Victorian streaks ran through her lyrics and she occasionally delivered her songs in a panoply of accents and vernacular. (See, for instance, the Cockney gangster narrating ) But if explicit Britishness alone were enough to sink a musical career in the United States, the following list would be nothing but gibberish to all but the most concerted Anglophile music fans: the Smiths, the Cure, Blur, Oasis, Pulp, the Clash, the Sex Pistols, the Kinks. Some carved out successful, sustained American careers. Some just had a hit or two. But all of them were super-British in one way or another, and all of them achieved a level of cultural visibility greater than Kate Bush.

She's too weird. During the time that Bush was putting out her best work, we made Cyndi Lauper a feminist icon and transformed Peter Gabriel from a peculiar art-rocker into a superstar with an album that featured cerebral oddball Laurie Anderson, Senegalese singer Youssou N'Dour and Bush herself. There may been a limited number of "weirdo" slots available, but we certainly weren't instinctively turning them away at the door.

She's too literary. Perhaps. She did, after all, not only wring a U.K. hit out of Emily Brontë but also successfully captured, in "The Sensual World," the eroticism that James Joyce infused into the word "yes." But maybe it's not her literariness, per se, but her theatricality. Her obsessions have included the stage ("Wow"), cinema (granted, it's an ostensibly low form saluted in "Hammer Horror," but it counts) and ballet ("The Red Shoes"), and not just within her lyrics. Her lone tour was a multimedia spectacle with dancers, films, costume changes and magic. (Back in 1979, it was performance art; now, it's Katy Perry.) Her videos followed suit and eventually became cinematic in scope, as evidenced by the clip for "Cloudbusting," featuring Donald Sutherland as her father. And rather than using her songs to bear her soul, she tends instead to inhabit different characters, many with their own unique voices; see, again, "There Goes A Tenner." A reader we could handle. An auteur we couldn't, at least not in the 1980s.


We've already got a Tori Amos, thanks. And a Sarah McLachlan, though Zimmerman doesn't say that. The problem is, while he acknowledges that Bush had a jump on Amos, he skips over the fact that by the time that Amos appeared in 1992, Bush was pretty much already a lost cause in the U.S. The success of "Running Up That Hill" didn't carry over to its album Hounds Of Love, a best-of (which in the U.K. was a greatest-hits) didn't drum up interest in what people had been missing all those years and a switch in American labels from EMI to Columbia, which worked hard to break her with The Sensual World, seemed to have zero impact. After Amos went gold with Little Earthquakes, Bush released one more album before going into hibernation for a dozen years. Amos didn't steal her thunder because there was none to steal.

(It should, on the other hand, be mentioned that Amos's career can actually be read as evidence that Bush did succeed over here, in her way. I first learned about Amos through discussions on the Kate Bush USENET group rec.music.gaffa – "gaffa" being an obscure reference to a Bush song, code recognizable only to those in the know – where she was talked up with great enthusiasm. She and McLachlan proved that there was room for piano-playing women of a far artier bent than anything even Joni Mitchell or Laura Nyro could inspire. There's a solid case to be made that Bush laid the groundwork for that generation of performers, even if she didn't get to reap the rewards herself.)

She's too reclusive. That she is. After the aforementioned 1979 tour, she retired from live performance (save for the occasional one-off like the ). She also started taking longer and longer between albums, until the amount of time Bush spent gestating Aerial (her last album of all-new material) was only seven years less than the amount of time she spent gestating her entire career. (She was 19 when "Wuthering Heights" came out.) But while those certainly had their impact, it again doesn't explain why she was successful in her home country, where Aerial hit #3 and its lone single, "King Of The Mountain," reached #4. Reclusive though she may be, it didn't hurt her in England.

So now that I've lovingly shut down all of Zimmerman's arguments, how to explain Bush's relative lack of success in this country? Well, she certainly didn't fit any of the molds of what women were doing in pop music in the 1980s; only Madonna (who, for whatever it's worth, is a mere 17 days younger than Bush) was as chameleonic, but she was both more overtly sexual and more cannily club-oriented in a particularly dance-crazy decade. And Peter Gabriel notwithstanding, art rock wasn't exactly a ticket to mass success.

But it might be that Bush never broke through in the U.S. because she just wasn't that interested in it. Columbia certainly was, wanting to prove with The Sensual World that their new investment wasn't just a one-hit wonder. But looking back at Bush's career, there's a nagging sense that if American success was truly something she'd wanted, she would have booked those tours, done that press and schmoozed radio and MTV. She didn't, and as a result or not, she remains the province of a small group of highly devoted American fans.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 6:50 pm
by Scooter
For some reason this was always my favourite (the song, not necessarily the video:



She was probably better known in Canada than in the U.S.; several of her albums went platinum here. But there were probably three people in my entire high school who knew who she was - two of us gay, me and my best friend, and a girl with fuchsia hair who dated a guy in a grunge band.

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:57 am
by Daisy
Bollocks, fuck and bugger... Despite me on one ticket site and hubby on another at dead on half nine... They'd all gone within 10 minutes.

Guess I'm gonna have to wait another 35 years

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:12 pm
by Lord Jim
Just clicked on Scooter's video for the 1st time...

I don't want to read too much into this, but is there maybe a little phallic symbolism implied there?

Re: Wow, wow... Unbelievable!!

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:19 pm
by Gob
Daisy, more shows have been added!