Page 1 of 1
Tilt shift photography
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 8:55 am
by Gob
This amazing tilt-shift photography was the brainchild art student Serena Malyon. Using Photoshop, she manipulated the lighting and focus by blurring and sharpening certain parts of the photo to give it that realistic pop!
More examples here.
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:49 am
by loCAtek
um yea, don't think she invented this. Seen it on History Channel
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:58 pm
by dales
Throwing the background out of focus?
A wide f-stop will do that.
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:51 pm
by Gob
On a flat painting? LOL!
Dales mate, the photograph which was shopped to look 3D is this one
"Prison Courtyard" By Van Gogh. F stop would have no effect whatsoever.

Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:15 pm
by Rick
loCAtek wrote:um yea, don't think she invented this. Seen it on History Channel
LO, I don't think it was suggested that she invented the process.
It was a commentary on how she used it on some of Van Gogh's works...
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:19 am
by loCAtek
"tilt-shift photography was the brainchild art student Serena Malyon"
...sounds like she's claiming credit for it.
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:58 am
by Rick
loCAtek wrote:"tilt-shift photography was the brainchild art student Serena Malyon"
...sounds like she's claiming credit for it.
When you leave off the "This Amazing" I guess it does...
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:36 am
by rubato
A wholly useless attempt to profit from a real master.
A cultural vampire. Pay her no attention. Her version is stealing and not very good anyway.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:51 pm
by Big RR
Stealing? How? In the way, say, van Cliburn steals from Chopin? These are paintings by old masters in the public domain, and she is putting her interpretation/spin on them, much as a performer does with music. It may be good, bad, or mediocre, but I hardly see it as "stealing", especially since the original is avaialable for all who seek to enjoy it without her particular interpretation.
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:02 am
by Gob
Big RR wrote:Stealing? How? In the way, say, van Cliburn steals from Chopin? These are paintings by old masters in the public domain, and she is putting her interpretation/spin on them, much as a performer does with music. It may be good, bad, or mediocre, but I hardly see it as "stealing", especially since the original is avaialable for all who seek to enjoy it without her particular interpretation.
+1
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:54 am
by Andrew D
What has she claimed (or does anyone else claim) that she has accomplished?
She added a bit of color to the closest figures. People were adding color to photographs before she was born. (Yes, I know that the original is not a photograph. Same point stands.)
She fuzzed out the figures further back. Too bad that the result does not look anything like what an observer on the scene would actually see.
She fucked up the background. Yeehah!
People who want to call themselves artists should consider producing art.
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:19 am
by Gob
I think the way she's created a 3D effect out of the old masters is quite good, I don't think anyone has claimed she's produced great art.
Re: Tilt shift photography
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:47 pm
by Big RR
Personally I don't think she's done very much, I just dispute that it is theft.