Best worse films of 2012
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:50 pm
What is the worst film of the year?
Most disappointing musical: Rock of Ages
Dishonourable mention: Alvin & the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked
When Tom Cruise is the best thing about a musical, something has gone really wrong. This was a genuinely fun stage musical, but it revolved around taking the mickey out of glam rock and the '80s. Unfortunately Cruise was the only one who got that, as he committed to hamming up as Stacee Jaxx while the rest of the cast committed to nothing except a sense of awkward desire to retain their dignity. Hint: Glam rock and dignity just don't mix.
Most disappointing romance: Bel Ami
Dishonourable mention: A Little Bit of Heaven, Wuthering Heights
Where Andrea Arnold's rendition of Bronte tried far too hard to be important and clever, Kate Hudson made painfully little effort to engage our brains in A Little Bit of Heaven. Yet it was Guy de Maupassant who was most abused when his 1885 novel was adapted into a mindless and soulless vehicle for Robert Pattinson and three otherwise excellent actresses to stumble around 19th-century Paris trying to solve the mystery of the lost will to live.
Most disappointing teen film: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2
Dishonourable mention: Streetdance 2 3D
On a list defined by expectations, it was always going to take a lot for a Twilight film to qualify. After all, we expect nothing from these films except glitter and bloodless fangs. Yet the final instalment in the saga only highlighted how well constructed the other films had been by comparison. Storyline aside, this film had no beginning, no ending and its only plot twist was borrowed from a 1980s soap opera. Here's hoping we can all wake up soon to discover that the potent lack of chemistry, drama or narrative was in fact all a dream.
Most disappointing thriller: Savages
Dishonourable mention: Arbitrage, Gone
If the Twilight filmmakers were looking for an ending, they should have called Oliver Stone, as he had two. Despite the wonderful efforts of the elder trio of Salma Hayek, Benicio Del Toro and John Travolta, this was a woeful film as the three young leads conspired with Stone to deliver an impotent, self-indulgent story set in the drug world that managed to contain no real action, drama or point. As for the core romance, when you have to get Blake Lively to constantly narrate the love scenes to tell you there's chemistry, you have a problem.
Most disappointing "serious" film: Cosmopolis
Dishonourable mention: W.E.
Robert Pattinson starring as a rich man who has lost interest in the world seemed at least convincing, however placing him in a limousine in front of criminally poor green-screened New York traffic with the goal of a haircut and a fondness for fortune-cookie wisdom was the beginning of a terminally tedious journey. Madonna's W.E. was a worse movie, but we have come to expect no more from Madge.
Most disappointing comedy: Kath & Kim'derella
Dishonourable mention: American Pie: Reunion, The Three Stooges, The Watch
It was a disappointing year for big names in comedy. Reuniting the American Pie team left a bad taste, the decision to modernise The Three Stooges was like being poked in the eye and The Watch was, well, unwatchable. Yet when Kath and Kim were handed a big-budget trip to Italy it was hard not to hope for a bit of cinematic Azzurri amusement. Instead we got an over-long, over-tired, over-big television episode with a touch of half-hearted pantomime.
Most disappointing rom-com: A Few Best Men
Dishonourable mention: Seeking a Friend for the End of the World, The Wedding Party, Friends with Kids
Declared “unreleasable” by one critic who was in turn publicly called out by the film's director, A Few Best Men did find an audience. How it did so remains a mystery as this romantic comedy proved to have less chemistry than Steve Carell and Keira Knightley, fewer laughs than the interminable Friends with Kids and less cohesion than the meandering Wedding Party. A Few Best Men was big, very big, but it was also unfunny, very unfunny.
Most disappointing action film: Taken 2
Dishonourable mention: Alex Cross, Act of Valor, Killer Elite
The toughest call. Alex Cross was quite literally laughably bad, with audiences taking to jeering the woeful lack of action. Yet Taken 2, one of the most anticipated films of the year, was a lesson in poor sequel making. It took the same premise and the same characters and pressed repeat, hoping no one would pause to ask ... well, anything. It was dull, unoriginal and worst of all had action fans noting how implausible the whole thing was.
Most disappointing ... What was it? The Master
This was possibly one of the most technically proficient films released in 2012. The performances from both Joaquin Phoenix and Philip Seymour Hoffman were excellent, the look and style exceptional, but it was lost in terms of plot and engagement. This is not a question of escapism, clearly this was not popcorn entertainment, but as a holistic piece it was not engaging or captivating. From a master like Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master was disappointing.
Most disappointing sci-fi movie: Prometheus 3D
Dishonourable mention: Total Recall, Underworld Awakening 3D, Dredd 3D
Total Recall and Underworld Awakening were just plain bad. Dredd would have been a whole lot better were it not a pale imitation of The Raid. Prometheus, though, was almost bound to disappoint as cinema fans anticipated the second coming of film, Ridley Scott returning to the Alien franchise. Would it be horror? Would it be action? Would it be something else? Sadly we still don't know. It was long and vague, over-ambitious and underwhelming. It wasn't awful, but it was a galaxy shy of our expectations.
The Big Losers
There are a few trends worth noting above. Clearly it has not been a good year for comedy with so many worthy candidates for the wooden spoon. Sadly we can also see that while Australia keeps producing some outstanding cinema, we are also more than capable of producing some of the biggest turkeys as well, though at least we are doing it in a number of genres. It is also disappointing to see how many sequels or remakes made the list as Hollywood proves once again that it is always a good idea to destroy a legacy if money can be made. Most impressive is Robert Pattinson's ability to star in no fewer than three of the worst films of the year, which should at least provide some good news as surely our expectations next year will be so low it will be much harder for him to make the list again.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/mov ... z2FvEIQSAy