I ban Guin for hurling insults at me, like calling me cheerful.Guinevere wrote:I ban @w for being so cheerful lately.
Ban the person above you.
Re: Ban the person above you.
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 20851
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Ban the person above you.
I don't ever want to be banned again. But if I did, first I'd ban @w for six reasons to be specified later
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Meade because he is probably all annoyed over various places I have put commas, or not put them as the case may be. I further ban him for not expressing his displeasure over my typing gaffe in another thread that I specifically did not correct in order to annoy him. I mean, I put it in the title, just for him.
Ban the person above you.
I ban me for not banning RayThom sooner.
It's the right thing to do. What a bonehead.
It's the right thing to do. What a bonehead.
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 20851
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Ban the person above you.
Well that leaves me feeling supernumerary. (Heh heh.... @w got punctuated!)
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban joe for not having the intestinal fortitude to own up to being Liberty, and for pretending to be me and for having his creation, liberty, further his pretense.
would an intestinal fort be made of poop?
would an intestinal fort be made of poop?
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban wesw for being a little turd and not playing this game properly.wesw wrote:I ban joe for not having the intestinal fortitude to own up to being Liberty, and for pretending to be me and for having his creation, liberty, further his pretense.
would an intestinal fort be made of poop?
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban TPK@W for being potty and calling the kettle blackie
- Econoline
- Posts: 9597
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban wes because I'm the only one here who hasn't banned him yet, and I'm feeling lonely.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Econoline in the name of progressive inclusion.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban @w for making me think (trying to figure out WTF "progressive inclusion" means).
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Kristina because I now realize I probably insulted Econoline because it turns out that "progressive inclusion" means something specific pertaining to mainstreaming special education kids into regular classes. When I threw the words together I was thinking along the lines of multiculturalism. Oh me oh my.
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban @W because its getting to be a habit.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County
Re: Ban the person above you.
Can I play too?
I ban Guinevere for messin' around with Lancelot.
-"BB"-
I ban Guinevere for messin' around with Lancelot.
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Bill for not knowing that Guin's sweetie is the Swede.Bicycle Bill wrote:Can I play too?
I ban Guinevere for messin' around with Lancelot.
-"BB"-
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban TPFKA@W for posting under an assumed name. (TPFKA stands for 'the poster formerly known as', right?)
-"BB"-
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 20851
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Ban the person above you.
I choose to prevent Bill from entering our fine matriarchy as an unexamined life-form and he is therefore bounced from the board like a rubber band (banned, geddit?)
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Ban the person above you.
I ban Bill for assuming it to be an assumed name and not realizing all board members here assume to be posting under assumed names. Ignore Meade, he doesn't play with all his marbles.Bicycle Bill wrote:I ban TPFKA@W for posting under an assumed name. (TPFKA stands for 'the poster formerly known as', right?)
-"BB"-
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 20851
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Ban the person above you.
@w is hereby proscribed (a) for ignoring me; (ii) for baseless allegations involving glass balls and (4) causing Bill to be banned twice as often as he should be
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Surrounded by Trumptards in Rockland, WI – a small rural village in La Crosse County
Re: Ban the person above you.
A matriarchy, is it? Hmmmm.......MajGenl.Meade wrote:I choose to prevent Bill from entering our fine matriarchy ......
As a single male, I may end up learning to *LIKE* this place!!
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?