liberty wrote:And then there was the case of the Canadian pig farmer who kidnaped and fed woman to his pigs.
Robert Pickton may have killed upwards of 60 women; remains of over 30 women were found on his farm, but severe decomposition of most of the remains made it difficult to know much for sure. That Pickton fed the women to his pigs was never a claim made through forensics or by any law enforcement agency, but since Pickton disposed of the bodies on his farm on which he kept pigs, it is possible that pigs got to them, or wild animals, or insects, or a combination of the three.
There was speculation that some bodies were eaten by the pigs, just as there was speculation that they were mixed with scrap pig parts that went to a rendering plant. Health Canada did a risk assessment based on the possibility that human flesh was ground and mixed with pork sold for human consumption, but found no evidence that it ever happened.
Some bodies were found stuffed in a freezer. If the plan was to feed them to the pigs, what was Pickton going to do, leave a corpse out in the open for three days or so to thaw it out for them?
So no, the claim that Pickton "fed woman [sic] to his pigs" can not be called "true" because there is absolutely nothing that even points in that direction.
And then how about the Canadian woman, who turned her husband over to another man to be held captive in a closet and starve, raped and tortured.
She didn't "turn him over"; the three of them lived together after the husband met the guy at an AA meeting and invited him to their home. He and the wife began a relationship and she became pregnant with his child. The three of them moved together twice. The man instigated abusive behaviour towards the husband that escalated into torture; there was never any claim that it was the wife's idea to torture him. She had an IQ of 59, enough to know right from wrong, but it's preposterous to attempt to paint her as the mastermind behind it all. She allowed herself to acquiesce to her husband's torture, which is bad enough, but she was incapable of seeing beyond her preoccupation with preventing Children's Aid from taking her soon to be born child that drove her complicity in prolonging her husband's suffering by keeping him a prisoner and telling the neighbours cover stories to explain his injuries.
But "turned her husband over"? A claim at complete variance to the facts. Nor do I remember reading any news account saying that the husband was :"raped". There were sexual assault charges, which in Canada cover anything from inappropriate sexual touching to violent penetrations. I doubt the husband's genitalia were spared the mutilation inflicted on the rest of his body, that would be sexual assault without being "rape".
So this second claim is also not true.
The third one is my favourite
liberty wrote:You talk about how barbaric and privative [sic] we are, but at least we don’t shit on the floor of public places.
because it is precisely the sort of off-the-scale preposterous claim that makes you such an easy mark. Because anyone with more functioning neurons than a blueberry cheesecake would have immediately asked themselves, "Is my blind faith in all-encompassing American superiority so strong and unwavering, that I am confident in claiming that not a single person in the U.S. has ever taken a dump in public? Do I really want to choose to defend my country's honour on the battlefield of whose inhabitants are the most prolific public poopers?"
But that isn't you. So here's just a few to get you started:
Is Public Pooping A New Trend?
Mapping San Francisco’s Sidewalk Pooping Problem
The Straight Poop About Florida's Public Defecators
Jogger known as 'The Mad Pooper' keeps pooping on sidewalk in Colorado Springs
School chief charged over defecating on rival's sports field
State Police Solve Mystery Of Who Defecated In East Granby Cul-De-Sac
For my part, I would have chosen a metric other than the incidence of public defecation to represent the pinnacle of civilization, but it takes all kinds to make a world, and some people relate better to manure than others.
liberty wrote:everything I said is true; look it up.
Oh look, yet one more false statement.
liberty wrote:Jim, you haven’t seen nothing yet. Just because I choose not to do something doesn’t mean I don’t have the capability...My words can hurt him
So you've said many, many times, and yet it hasn't happened. It's looking like you thought that if I believed you were holding who-knows-what over my head, that I would feel threatened enough to back off on calling you on your bullshit.
Here's a clue that being a parent should have taught you, but it seems to have passed you by - threats can only work for as long as the one being threatened believes you will make good on the threat.
Nothing you have managed to come up with so far carries even the smallest hint that back behind the lines you've been holding the big gun that will inflict enough damage to destroy the will to fight.
This latest attempt is your weakest yet. Seriously, trying to cut a gay man to the quick by drawing attention to the fact that we get fucked in the ass with dicks, and that
gasp it requires lubricant? Do you imagine that gay men harbour some secret shame about getting fucked in the ass, or about residual lube in our freshly fucked asses?
I mean, Jesus H. Christ, we even
gave it a name.
So I am calling your bluff. And please, don't hide behind being a Christian and a gentleman, when it has never stopped you before. Do what you imagine to be your worst. If a backlash from other posters concerns you, forget it. I am the one inviting you to do it, in spite of your own "reservations"; no one else should attack you for doing expressly as I asked.
For my part, I promise whatever it says will not be the cause of any retaliation in kind by me. There will be many future occasions when you will deserve it.
And based on what looks to have been a trial balloon of sorts, I will give you a giant hint by advising you that anything based on what gay men do with/to their body parts, or who, where, when, how, or why it is done, is not going to be a successful strategy. You thought that drawing notice to the fact that gay men lube their ass to get fucked would somehow shame or embarrass me. If you continue on that track I will be happy to share why I enjoy getting fucked in the ass and what makes me good at it. I'm sure I can include a few stories about some of my more memorable ass fucks, perhaps you might get curious enough to try it out yourself.
So unless you really want to learn what was the biggest dick I ever had in my ass, how many dicks I have had in my ass at the same time, how many dicks have been in my ass over the course of a day, how many people were participating and how many were watching, how often it was recorded to video or broadcast online, who ejaculated where, how much was there, how far did it travel, and what was done with it afterwards, how often I've done it professionally, etc., then you need to develop an entirely new plan of attack that will nevertheless end up making you far more uncomfortable than it can ever do to me.
I am used to insults and abuse from an early age.
Clearly people could discern from an early age just how much fodder there was to work with.
