Page 1 of 1

Purchasing vs leasing

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:03 pm
by Gob
Purchasing


The maths on the Paul McCartney-Heather Mills divorce is as follows:
After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49 million.
Assuming he had sex every night during their 5 year relationship it ended up costing him $26,849 per time.

This is Heather.

Image


Leasing

On the other hand, New York Governor Elliot Spitzer's hooker, Kristen, an absolute stunner charges $4,000 per night.

This is Kristen.

Image

Had Paul McCartney "employed" Kristen for 5 years, he would have paid $7.3 million in total, for sex every night for 5 years:
(a $41.7 million savings).

Value-added benefits are:
 a 22 year old
 no begging
 no coaxing
 never a headache
 happily agrees to all requests
 no complaining
 no honey-do lists
 has TWO great LEGS!!
 Best of all, she leaves, and comes back when asked. All at 1/7th the cost and no legal fees.

Sometimes leasing just makes more sense.

Re: Purchasing vs leasing

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:23 pm
by Jarlaxle
Someone I work with observed that for about 5% of what the divorce cost him, he could probably have gotten a hell of a good hit man...

He said the same about Tiger Woods.