Again you don't read for comprehension. I have bolded the words for you.
See, the first statement said you may not be as clever as you
think you are. Now, we all
think we are a certain degree of "clever" - from 'not very' to 'average' to 'very' and all grades in between. You are somewhere on that spectrum as are we all.
So it is useless to respond to that by arguing that you never
claim to be anything special. No one said you made any
claim, least of all to being something special.
As I wrote, you don't know how to distinguish between "thinking" and "claiming". You proved it by responding to a remark about you
thinking with an irrelevant argument about you
claiming.
liberty wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 9:47 pm
MajGenl.Meade wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:49 pm
I wonder what liberty would be like if he was as clever and intelligent as he thinks he is.
Have I ever claimed to be anything special?
There's the problem, lib. You don't know the difference between claiming and thinking
Wrong again etc etc
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts