Page 1 of 1

Kate's tits.....

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:08 pm
by Gob
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have launched legal action against the French magazine Closer over its publication of topless pictures of the duchess, Clarence House has said.

The celebrity gossip magazine printed pictures of the duchess taken during the couple's private holiday in France.

A royal spokesman said the legal proceedings had been launched in France and were for breach of privacy.

Closer's editor said the couple were "visible from the street".

"These photos are not in the least shocking. They show a young woman sunbathing topless, like the millions of women you see on beaches," said Laurence Pieau.

She described the reaction as "a little disproportionate".
Why? Not up to much are they, a bit breastitute?

I demand pictures!!

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:13 pm
by MajGenl.Meade
Image

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:38 pm
by dales
Image

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:46 pm
by loCAtek
WHAT!? Royal mammaries!!!!!? Oh the humanity!
:wgaf:

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:04 pm
by The Hen
Kate with both her tits on display ....

Image

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:08 pm
by Gob
Her sister could be her "stunt tits"!

Image

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:10 pm
by The Hen
Her sister ought to look at better support. Her tits look older than their age there.

She'll end up being the stunt tits for National Geographic footage if she doesn't watch out.

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:13 pm
by Gob
They are royal tits ...no visible means of support....

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:19 pm
by The Hen
They are "associated to royalty" tits.

They tend to try and cling on without appearing to do anything.

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:20 am
by The Hen

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:25 am
by Gob
Very nice!

A bit od a storm in a B cup though...

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:05 pm
by Lord Jim
At least she was with her husband....

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:13 pm
by Gob
I take it there is a missing, "unlike his mum was", in that statement Jim? :D

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:06 am
by Gob
The photos are understood to have been taken using powerful, long lenses by photographers standing on a public road or footpath at a distance estimated at between 800 metres and 1.3 kilometres away.
Herald photographer Ben Rushton climbed to the top of Marks Park yesterday morning and zoomed in on Gabriella Duddy lying on her towel at the far end of the beach.

To take her picture he required camera equipment worth almost $20,000. He used a Canon EOS-1D Mark IV camera, a 600 millimetre lens and a 2x converter to double the magnification of the lens. He shot with a 1/1000th second shutter speed to steady the image, which shook under the extreme magnification. The lens was so heavy Rushton mounted it on a tripod to stop it snapping off the camera.

Image
Photographer Ben Rushton takes a photo of Gabriella Duddy on North Bondi from St Peters park with a high-power lens. Photo: Edwina Pickles



''I felt like a sniper,'' he said.

The military reference is appropriate. Another Herald photographer, Brendan Esposito, said the industry jargon for a long-range shot like the one of the duchess was ''target acquired''.

''There's some suggestion those photos have been taken by a drone aircraft,'' Esposito said. ''That's the talk in the industry.''

Image
Gabriella Duddy poses on North Bondi to demonstrate how the paparazzi was able to snap the topless photo of Kate Middleton. Photo: Ben Rushton


Ms Duddy, who agreed to be photographed, said she felt uneasy to think she could be captured in a clear image by a man she could not see, standing so far away.

''You think you're safe,'' said Ms Duddy, 21, who lives in Bellevue Hill. ''She [the duchess] probably thought she was safe and private.''

The British press has branded the editors of Closer as ''grinning perverts'' while the photographer has been labelled a ''peeping Tom''.

map of the distance of the shot



Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebri ... z26n5cwa3l

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:03 am
by The Hen
THIS is the sort of invasion of privacy that civil libertarians should go ape shit over, not the monitoring of public safety by CCTVs.

Re: Kate's tits.....

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:31 am
by Rick
Image

Here's a picture of big foots tits taken at the same distance.

I guess the royals just have a hard time keeping their clothes on...